Hi - Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 6:44 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 5:16 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: >> ... > >> There is a possible alternative and that is to not have a incubating area >> and have all projects just use /dist/dev/<projectname> and >> /dist/release/<projectname>. That way no clean up would be needed. The >> releases still have incubator disclaimers and are likely downloaded from >> places where it obvious they are incubating projects. But I assume their >> may be some permission issues with this approach? >> > > This *can* be done, without problem. IPMC would just be responsible for > multiple dev/release areas. Not an issue. We auto-generate ACLs for the > areas, so it may take a little work to figure this out, but it's a Simple > Matter of Programming :-) We would need to modify the clutch process, but a happy consequence could be a version to look at the whole of the release directories for the whole foundation. > > With that said, and with my Infra hat on, I'd like to see a thought from > the Legal peeps on whether the incubator/ directory structure layout is a > requirement (to supplement the disclaimers). I know there are distinct > opinions about what/how we host releases on our servers. Agreed. Regards, Dave > > Cheers, > Greg > InfraAdmin, ASF --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
