Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.1.1-incubating Candidate 1

Repeating my +1 (binding) from the dev@ thread. Regards, Dave > On Sep 11, 2018, at 3:31 PM, Jerry Peng wrote: > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version > 2.1.1-incubating. > > Voting passed for release on Pulsar dev mailing : > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.1.1-incubating Candidate 1

Hi Jerry, Do we need SHA-1 for the DEB and RPMS packages? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 11, 2018, at 4:55 PM, Jerry Peng wrote: > > Thanks Henk for pointing that out. I have removed the SHA-1 checksums. > > Best, > > Jerry > >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 4:35 PM Henk P. Penning

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Hi Justin, Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 11, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >>> I'm curious to why organisations are mention on the team page [2] >> >> I think we've followed what other projects are doing. e.g. >> https://spark.apache.org/committers.html >> >> Any ASF policy

Re: Auto-cleaning up Stale PRs

Hi - What if the stale PR is from a new community member who is trying to make a contribution? Those should be handled by a committer with direct discussion. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:40 PM, Hagay Lupesko wrote: > > Im also interested in this PR policy automat

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Hi - The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many releases and have grown the community. Vote: [ ] +1 - Recommend Graduation of Apache Pulsar as a TLP [ ] -1 - Do not recommend graduation of Apache Pulsar because …. At the mento

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

+1 - binding - Graduate Pulsar! Regards, Dave > On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered > Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many releases and have grown the > community

Re: Auto-cleaning up Stale PRs

Regards, Dave > > -s > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:39 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> What if the stale PR is from a new community member who is trying to make >> a contribution? Those should be handled by a committer with direct >> discussi

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

oss-datacenter replication; Modification is “lightweight compute framework” replaces "guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages" >> > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:49 AM sebb wrote: >> &

[RESULTS][VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

The VOTE passes with: 7 +1 Votes (Binding) 6 +1 Votes (Non-binding) 0 -1 Votes Hurray! > On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered > Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many relea

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

I have added the resolution to the Board Agenda for next Wednesday Regards, Dave > On Sep 15, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The VOTE passes with: > > 7 +1 Votes (Binding) > 6 +1 Votes (Non-binding) > 0 -1 Votes > > Hurray! > > >> O

Re: [VOTE] Retire Gearpump podling

+1 retire Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 16, 2018, at 2:31 AM, Manu Zhang wrote: > > Hi mentors, > > The Gearpump podling has voted to retire from incubation. Here are the > relevant discussion and vote threads from the dev list. The vote passed > unanimously with 6 +1s. > > DISCUSS: > https://

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

Github id does not often equal Apache id. It is not always obvious. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Obviously, lots of informational activity occurs off the mailing list. A > great example is answering questions on stack overflow. And Ap

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

ous, that isn't always obviously correct. > Establishing a mapping or using an Apache ID is important. > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Github id does not often equal Apache id. It is not always obvious. >> >> Regards, >>

Re: We want to contribute brpc to ASF, looking for champion and mentor ,please help

Hi Zhongyi Tan, With Daffofil, Doris and eCharts I am mentoring three projects. I will watch this one as there are some similar challenges, but I don’t think I have time to Mentor this one. (I may pick up one other who have lost an inactive mentor.) All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

As requested - WHIMSY-207 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-207> Show Github username on Roster Tables Regards, Dave > On Sep 17, 2018, at 4:17 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 17 September 2018 at 23:02, Dave Fisher wrote: >> A mapping is made on id.apache.org and sho

Re: Does Zipkin need to sign a SGA ?

Hi, Is OpenZipkin a formal entity? What about Lookout who also had a fork (according to the references)? At Twitter you might try Remy DeCausemaker. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 18, 2018, at 6:59 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > > Hi, John > > Thanks for the input. So, I would hazard

Re: Auto-cleaning up Stale PRs

s without >>> any >>>>>>> movement on the PR. >>>>>> >>>>>> Automatically closing such issues is not going to do anything to >> aid >>>>>> community building and is likely to actively damage such efforts. >>&

Re: We want to contribute brpc to ASF, looking for champion and mentor ,please help

Hi Justin, Given the recent activity around dropping inactive mentors there will be a large need for fresh IPMC members. I think that a general message to members@ with a list of podlings and proposals needing mentors would be a reasonable message. See you in Montreal. Regards, Dave > On Sep

Re: Mentors wanted for Apache Dubbo (incubating)

Hi - Great talking to community members last night at Apachecon. I appreciate being asked to mentor. I’m willing to join Justin and Mark in helping the Dubbo community as a mentor. Regards, Dave > On Sep 20, 2018, at 10:33 PM, Huxing Zhang wrote: > > Hi community, > > The Apache Dubbo proje

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

+1 (binding) > On Sep 26, 2018, at 12:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > given that we've got only positive feedback on the DISCUSS > thread I'd like to start an official VOTE thread now. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate > Apache ServiceComb from the incubator

Re: Does Zipkin need to sign a SGA ?

Hi, I was looking at the October report and see that we need to close the loop on this thread. > On Sep 27, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:29 PM Adrian Cole wrote: >> ...basically I'm sure many of us would like to know where the >> conce

Re: Mentors wanted for Apache Annotator (incubating)

Hi - I’m looking at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/annotator It may not be nice to point this out, but I only see two PPMC and three Committers. That is not a viable PPMC. Two of the Committers were Initial Committers and should have bee

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pinot into Apache Incubator

Here’s to a fine fermentation of Pinot. +1 Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 15, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Sorry for the belated reply -- was on a trip to China. > > Yes, I'd love to be added as a mentor. > > And, FWIW +1 on the proposal ;-) > > Thanks, > Roman

Re: Getting through the hoops (was: Mentors wanted...)

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 16, 2018, at 1:25 AM, Serge Huber wrote: > > > Actually I think there is a lot of documentation and in itself it can be a > bit daunting. Also for the committer request, it would be great if it could > be streamlined by doing some kind of online form but the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

Hi - The Podling Suitable Name Search is unresolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-148 Note that links are given, but some remarks about the results are needed. Regards, Dave > On Oct 17, 2018, at 8:35 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-148 >>> > >>> > BTW, I think we can remove the "creation of a set of bylaws" line, to just >>> > follow the ASF bylaws. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Lionel >>> > >&

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

> On Oct 24, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > It has been said many times that Apache does not do binary releases, only > source releases. But users like binary releases (or pre-built binary > artifacts, if you prefer), and therefore podlings like to create them. > > So, is there an

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

> On Oct 24, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > It has been said many times that Apache does not do binary releases, only > source releases. But users like binary releases (or pre-built binary > artifacts, if you prefer), and therefore podlings like to create them. > > So, is there an

[DISCUSS] Ace

://github.com/zyearn <http://github.com/zyearn> zhujiashun2...@gmail.com <mailto:zhujiashun2...@gmail.com>) Wang Yao(https://github.com/ipconfigme <https://github.com/ipconfigme> ipconfi...@gmail.com <mailto:ipconfi...@gmail.com>) Sponsors: Champion: Dave Fisher

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

Sorry about that I missed the topic autocorrection. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 24, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I would like to discuss accepting bprc project into the Incubator: > Initially there were five developers from Baidu, but now these a

Re: Draft email to member list to try and recruit some new mentors

+1. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> On 10/26/2018 8:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> I’m planning an sending an email to members@ to try and help get a few more >> mentors on board. > I'm +1 for anything to try and cajole more mentors! > > > > -

Re: UNICEF Open Source project- Apache Foundation

Exactly as Kellen describes! If for whatever reason you require an offline discussion to start then I’m sure someone here may be willing to “champion” your proposal. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2018, at 9:43 PM, kellen sunderland > wrote: > > Hello Ariam, reading through

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 1, 2018, at 12:31 AM, William Guo wrote: > > +dev > > -- Forwarded message - > From: William Guo > Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:21 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP > To: > > > Hi all,

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

Any suggestions or comments on this proposal before I bring it to a VOTE? > On Oct 25, 2018, at 7:38 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Sorry about that I missed the topic autocorrection. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 24, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Dave Fisher > <mailto

Re: Approaching Apache's 200th top level project and more than 300 projects have gone through the incubator

Next? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 2, 2018, at 9:14 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > very cool! > >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 23:48 Justin Mclean > >> Hi, >> >> It looks like the next project to graduate after Griffin will be the ASF’s >> 200th top level project! >> >> We’ll also recently passe

Champion Role is Only to Get a Podling Started

Hi Everyone, but especially mentors. I saw this email from a mentor on the Airflow dev list: [1] "The big list that *has* to be filled out and correct is here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/airflow.html This is usually done by the Cham

Re: Some early stage questions

Hi Jacques, Welcome to the Apache Incubator. > On Nov 5, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Jacques Basaldúa wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to formulate a proposal to the ASF incubator. After spending > some time browsing the website, I still have a few novice questions I wish to > share with you.

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

Hi - There are some projects where the binary is all the users want. For example, Apache OpenOffice. In that case these binaries are an exception and while on dist they are not mirrored and instead we distribute through SourceForge. I think if binaries are kept in a separate folder from source

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing requirements for IPMC

Hi - >> ...I propose this: >> >> If someone has done several of the following: >> - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish >> - has been a release manager >> - has assembled LICENSE and NOTICE files >> - has reviewed and voted on releases >> - has proposed or accepted com

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

; more third party dependencies from the source file in the > directory[1]. > > [1]https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:01 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >&

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 7, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> brpc also includes third party code in the source tree. >> >> * https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party (BSD, MIT, >> MPL, and Public Domain) > > Being category B the MPL code may b

[VOTE] Accept burp into the Apache Incubator

ge...@gmail.com) * Chen Zhangyi(https://github.com/chenzhangyi frozen@gmail.com) * Jiang Rujie(https://github.com/old-bear jrjb...@gmail.com) * Zhu Jiashun(http://github.com/zyearn zhujiashun2...@gmail.com) * Wang Yao(https://github.com/ipconfigme ipconfi...@gmail.com) === Sponsors:

Re: [VOTE] Accept burp into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator. > > It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes > and more IPMC Votes are +1 than -1. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept burp into the Apache Incubator

Darn acid reflux! Thanks Julian > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Dave, > > You’ll want to cancel this vote. The subject line is an unfortunate victim of > auto-correct. > > Julian > > >> On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher

[CANCEL][VOTE] Accept burp into the Apache Incubator

Cancelling due to incorrect subject. > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator. > > It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes > and more I

[VOTE] Accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.

en@gmail.com>) * Jiang Rujie(https://github.com/old-bear <https://github.com/old-bear> jrjb...@gmail.com <mailto:jrjb...@gmail.com>) * Zhu Jiashun(http://github.com/zyearn <http://github.com/zyearn> zhujiashun2...@gmail.com <mailto:zhujiashun2...@gmail.com>) * W

Re: [VOTE] Accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.

+1 (binding) Regards, Dave > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator. > > It will last for at least 72 hours and will pass if at least 3 +1 IPMC Votes > and more IPMC Votes are

Re: [VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call > a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full > proposal is available on the wiki: >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Sha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing requirements for IPMC

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 8, 2018, at 3:43 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >>>> ...I propose this: >>>> >>>> If someone has done several of the followin

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg proposal for incubation

Hi - Looks very interesting. I have questions about the discrepancy between the Initial Committer list of 5 people vs. the Affliations list with 16 people? Is it true that the podling plans to start with just 5 committers? Who from this group is affiliated with Netflix? Regards, Dave > On No

[RESULTS][VOTE] Accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator.

tps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/81e959cb22349a68ceec2e2e50df814b7542e0f89286d97cb24b167a@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E> Regards, Dave > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > This is a VOTE to accept the brpc Project into the Apache Incubator. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg proposal for incubation

Looks good to me. The challenge here is community development. With such mentor/committer engagement I trust that the Apache Way is covered! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:46 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> On 11/12/2018 3:17 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: >> Thanks for poin

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

+1 (binding) > On Nov 13, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > +1 binding > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:06 AM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose >> accepting >>>

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 14, 2018, at 11:33 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > The question with which I started this discussion has not been > answered. Given that a collection of artifacts is up for a vote, and > those artifacts are a mixture of source and binary artifacts, what is > a revie

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

+1 (binding) I checked the signature and checksum. I did a rat check and there are no unexpected binaries. - Note CONTRIBUTING.md is a link to a not included file. Please fix in the next release. - CloudPickle has NOTICE requirements where the copyrights should be. Please fix in the next release

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

> On Nov 15, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I checked the signature and checksum. > I did a rat check and there are no unexpected binaries. > - Note CONTRIBUTING.md is a link to a not included file. Please fix in the > next release. &g

[VOTE] Retire ODF Toolkit

The ODF Toolkit community has VOTEd to Retire. The thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6de81dc33cb8311a38e38b927bfa1df7290c47ba7e7b39311cd06ce6@%3Codf-dev.incubator.apache.org%3E The results: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d4b4b33470a7bc3e70dc6192527168bb5907810045df5453c784cc93@

Re: [VOTE] Retire ODF Toolkit

p to TDF and/or one or two developers. 7.5 years in the Incubator is long enough. Regards, Dave > >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 20:54 Dave Fisher > >> The ODF Toolkit community has VOTEd to Retire. >> >> The thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6

[RESULTS][VOTE] Retire ODF Toolkit

The retirement VOTE passes with 7 additional +1 Retire VOTEs and no -1 VOTEs Regards, Dave > On Nov 16, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The ODF Toolkit community has VOTEd to Retire. > > The thread: > https://lists.apac

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

+1 (Binding) > On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a discussion with the Quickstep community: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E > and a formal passing vote: > https://

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Airflow to TLP

Hi - Please explain the status of the GPL’d code mentioned here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3400 Is it an optional dependency? Regards, Dave > On Dec 5, 2018, at 3:31 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > Hello- > > The Airflow podling community has VOTEd[0] to graduate, following

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Airflow to TLP

+1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 5, 2018, at 7:07 PM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Yes it is optional. Please See installation instructions. > > Bolke > > > Op do 6 dec. 2018 00:59 schreef Dave Fisher >> Hi - >>

Re: IPMC Board report - missing podling reports for DLab, Marvin-AI and Pinot

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> DLab prepared a report and posted it to the dev@ list, but unfortunately we >> mentors failed to get it posted to the wiki. > > Do you know why this is the case? Reminder were sent to the dev list and this

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

I wrote the short report already. Mailing lists did not happen until last Thursday/Friday. Warm Regards Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Thanks for the heads-up. A sing-off sounds like we are an acappella group! > > I'll ask BRPC if they h

Re: [DISCUSS] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 6:19 PM, Paul King wrote: > > +1 > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:56 AM Roy Lenferink wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The Apache Incubator is still having a repository on git-wip-us as well >> [1]. >> >> Does anyone have a problem with moving over the

Re: Trouble Reaching mentors?

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:47 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Zhongyi, I just signed off on the BRPC report. Nicely done. > > However, I saw a note you were having trouble getting responses from > mentors. My apologies! I don't think I'm getting the emails. Can you > r

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

I am the Champion. I went and JFDI the next step of the startup. It looks like we will have 4 mentors for BRPC which is great. Regards Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I wrote the short report already. > > Yes Dave you did, but the

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

Hi - My mistake as I took Gosling Von and fengji...@gmail.com as separate people. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 10:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> It looks like we will have 4 mentors for BRPC which is great. > > Who is the 4th there is only 3 on the roste

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

Hi Craig, This is the perfect new guidance. (1) I think that similar process needs to be used by Incubator Mentors for Initial PPMC Members. (2) I assume you will send to pmcs@ once the new guidance is confirmed. I don’t have specific edits in mind, but others no doubt may. (I wonder if writi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.9.0-incubating-rc01

Moving this to the Doris dev list - general@incubator is BCC’d. Regards, Dave > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > > Reed, > > Why not cancel rc1 and create rc2 fixing license header issue that Willem > pointed? > It seems it's better to be fixed. > > It also seems that no one

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 13, 2019, at 10:09 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > How’s their discussion board archived? Yes, archival is the question. One approach we took with OpenOffice was to move the phpBB for the forums onto PMC managed VMs using Apache Infra provided MySQL. Regards, Dave

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Great. It will be up to the Community and the Mentors to determine if any migrations make sense in order to protect the project’s valuable user discussions. Regards, Dave > On Jan 17, 2019, at 7:10 PM, Sebastian wrote: > > The question was only about the user discussions (e.g. to replace the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Unomi to TLP

-0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not in the Maturity model and I’m not sure why. It could be because that is ComDev and not the IPMC. Regards, Dave > On Jan 21, 2019, at 2:24 AM, Serg

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Unomi to TLP

Hi - > On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> -0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name >> search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not >

Chinese site echarts.baidu.com Was:: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts 4.2.1 (release candidate 1)

Hi Justin, You are looking at the Chinese version of this: https://echarts.apache.org I think that a reasonable solution for the pooling may be to put this website up on https://echarts.apache.org/zh/ and then redirect. That would

Re: Chinese site echarts.baidu.com Was:: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts 4.2.1 (release candidate 1)

Yes, essentially a similar discussion is in progress on dev@echarts. We’ll need to review stuff in ecomfe and the initial SGA to know what more may be needed. No need to discuss more here on general@ at this time.. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 30, 2019, at 7:55 PM, Justin Mclean

Re: Apache ODF Toolkit (retired) migration to TDF

Hi - > On Feb 4, 2019, at 8:49 AM, Thorsten Behrens > wrote: > > Dear people, > > one of your committers (Michael Stahl, in Cc) last year asked to > migrate the retired ODF Toolkit project over to the Document > Foundation, which TDF would be happy to accept. > > Volunteers from various sides

Re: Draft incubator report

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 2/5/2019 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> As long as these are not available to the general public all is fine. [1] >>> s/available/advertised/ >> Thanks that’s a better way of putting it. Obviously any published artefac

Re: Missing podling reports (due Wednesday 6th)

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 5, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > There’s less than a day to get you podling report in. Currently these > podlings have failed to report: > - BRPC > - Iceberg > - Ratis > - SDAP > > Any podling that fails to report by the deadline will be

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Hi - I would also be happy to volunteer as a Mentor to this podling. Regards, Dave > On Feb 5, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > +1 > > I would like to volunteer as an additional mentor. > > Kenn > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:57 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nice pro

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

ke you >> don't need anymore mentors so I can volunteer in any capacity you need. >> >> I think you are going to have trouble with the name though as >> https://cava.com/ is a great restaurant. >> >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:36 PM Da

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean >> that a software project called Cava is not suitab

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hey - not everyone agrees with Justin’s and Henry’s conclusions. I don’t have time to argue every point. AFAIK everyone releasing binary convenience to dockerhub believed they were authorized. Pulsar had ONE release that was current for a short time that mistakenly kept an RC in the name. It w

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > > >> On Feb 6, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> HI, >> >>> This was done. The issue is that the "3.0.0 outside Apache" release should >>> not be associated with Apache but with the previous project. >> >> They also made

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Dave, > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 9:12 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On F

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Prior “Non-Apache Releases” are attached to the repository and come along. >> What to do? I think we have to accept these, but mark them appropriately as >> deleting them would be for the project community during transition. >

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:44 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-17289 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-17289>

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Do we recommend that the Title be changed to add “Non-Apache release from >> prior to Incubation” or would it be sufficient for that text to be added to >> the Description? > > IMO however the PPMC want to handle it as long as

Re: Draft incubator report

ort >> Date: 6 February 2019 at 8:48:46 am AEDT >> To: Dave Fisher >> >> Hi, >> >>> Yes, that is better, but here is the next challenge. For distribution >>> channels like Maven, NPM, etc which some projects use to stage prospective >>>

Re: Draft incubator report

Hi - > On Feb 7, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I respectfully request that you edit the following to make it less alarming >> and remove any implication that the IPMC cannot handle our duties. > > I don’t read that implication there, this is quite factual all of the proj

Re: Draft incubator report

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Give the response from intro on use of docker. it would seem that this is not > actually allowed. > >> Nightly builds for project-internal use clearly marked as "snapshot" or >> "prerelease" (or similar) can

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2019, at 7:51 PM, Chris Lambertus wrote: > > > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Infra does not police what projects deploy on their dockerhub repos. Do we >>> need to? >> >> Well from a casual glance I can see several

Re: Renaming repos and security concerns

> On Feb 8, 2019, at 1:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > In the thread on guidelines for distributions I suggested some common naming > to help with trademarks, branding and be in line with release policy. > > There's a possible security issue here, as people could (in theory) take ov

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

Hi Julian, A perfect example! I think we should add a checkbox to the podling report where the podling indicates when they are fully in compliance with release policy. Until that is done we don’t worry. Additionally, Infra could tag and “release” with appropriate description when they move a

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi Chris - The Branding advice/requirements you would get does not differ between TLP and Podling other than places where an Incubating disclaimer should exist. Regarding contacting press@apache about any incubator limitations, Sally is pretty quick and my experience is that it is mostly about

Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi - Third party vendor considerations do not matter. Are you voting +1 with your Apache hat on or your Amazon hat? Regards, Dave > On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > +1 binding > Horovod is going to release it's 0.16.0 in the coming week with MXNet > integration. We need to re

Re: Apache ManifoldCF: Get a history report for a repository connection over REST API

Redirecting your query to d...@manifoldcf.apache.org Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 12, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Marta Gołąbek wrote: > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > I'm trying to get a history report for a repository connection over > ManifoldCF REST API. According to the documentation: > > https://manifo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

The product name is a problem. Please explain how this release relates to Apache Karaf? We can give you branding guidance once you do. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as it contains compiled code (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

Hi Adrian, Simple question inline. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 13, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: >> See [1][2] on policy and many many projects do it except those that were >> developed solely at the ASF. > In practice, you can find many, many that have stock files and were > not develo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

Hi Adrian/Justin, We are discussing the wrong points. The clear question is what is MavenWrapperDownloader.java and why does it need to be in source release? It doesn’t. The Zipkin build instruction should include the installation instructions for MavenWrapper. [3] Adrian will that work for Z

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >