Hi, I was looking at the October report and see that we need to close the loop on this thread.
> On Sep 27, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:29 PM Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...basically I'm sure many of us would like to know where the >> concerns are and how to address concretely what is of issue... > > As Craig wrote earlier here > >> ..."all that needs to be done" is to establish that all of the copyright >> owners >> sign either a Software Grant or an ICLA... > > So ideally all contributors sign a common Software Grant, or in some > documented way delegate that to someone who is authorized to represent > "the OpenZipkin community" and sign the software grant. > > As mentioned at INFRA-16989, the alternative is for all contributors > to sign an Apache iCLA, IIUC Craig correctly in this case a Software > Grant is not needed. > > From what you say it looks like there's no code from Twitter left in > the codebase that is to be imported, if that's the case (and again > provided we have documented declarations that confirm that) my opinion > is that you don't need to involve Twitter. I agree. In fact in looking at the Zipkin repository and the contributing.md referenced: https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md <https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md> It looks to me that the code is already covered. As such I think that all that is needed to get the migration unstuck is a comment from secret...@apache.org on INFRA-16989 Regards, Dave > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
