Re: Followup to VXQuery July 2013 report

Hi Ant, I was the shepherd on VXQuery in their last reporting period. I really don't feel like anything is really happening in the project, at least not anywhere that is visible. I even asked a technical question about one of their suggested use cases - organize and accessing Edgar documents. A

[Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

Alan Cabrera Tajo >Dave FisherDrill >Dave FisherS4 >Matt Franklin Olingo >Matt Franklin Provisionr >Ross Gardler Wave >Matt Hogstrom Sentry >Benson Marguilies Spark >Suresh Marru Allura

[S4] Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

signments for our September 2013 report: > >SHEPHERD PODLING >-- >Alan Cabrera Falcon >Alan Cabrera MetaModel >Alan Cabrera Tajo >Dave FisherDrill >Dave FisherS4 >Matt Fra

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

efforts. > We are working *very* hard on that (along with building kick-ass > technology into kick-ass code packaged up in a kick-ass and fully IP > cleared release). > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> I am concerned t

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

Hi - Well I was late with my retraction. So, I did so to the board directly and with the report. Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your podling does release that TLP status should come soon. Regards, Dave On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

Wonderful. On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release. > > The vote thread can be found here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3ccaka9qdkmxjp-r8v+zwabm5e4b5osrypjyp+dupvq2lr

Re: binary release artifacts

If you have concerns about Apache OpenOffice it is no longer incubating. If you will contact the project on its lists with a concrete example. Otherwise to my knowledge LICENSE and NOTICES are correct at an appropriate level. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Eric

Re: [DISCUSS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> ...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not sound >> meritocratic > > It's been like that for a while in the Incubator, people who sign up > as initial commi

Process for Granting Jenkins Access

A Mentoring question. Some of the committers in a podling want to access Jenkins. The instructions are here: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account I take it that for a podling any of the mentors should take the role of the PMC Chair and do this action. Please let me kn

Re: Shepherd assignments October 2013

i page. > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2013 > >Raphael Bircher Olingo >Alan Cabrera Celix > Alan Cabrera VXQuery >Dave Fisher DeviceMap >Dave Fisher Spark Although there are no reports yet. These projec

Re: Too many late reports

On Oct 6, 2013, at 9:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> Dave Fisher DeviceMap >>> Dave Fisher Spark >> >> Although there are no reports yet. > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

You have two IPMC votes. You need one more IPMC vote to pass. On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: > Dear general@, > > A few weeks ago, there were concerns raised about the VXQuery project's > ability to make releases. We now have an RC that has been voted for by the > PPMC and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona as an incubated project

+1 (binding) On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > Since discussion about the Sirona seems done, I'd like to call a vote > for Sirona to become an incubated project. > > The proposal is pasted below, and also available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SironaProposal > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.0.0 incubating (RC03)

Hi - A vote from an Olingo mentor. +1. (Binding) - makes 3 +1s from IPMC. Signatures and rat-check reports are in order. IMHO - There are some slight LICENSE and NOTICE quibbles to clear in the convenience binaries on the next release. (1) Dual licensed CDDL / LGPL Class B components need to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

Hi - I checked the source release and the signatures check out. Before I can VOTE I have questions. (1) What is the following file? A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as: =

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

HI Ant, On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote: > Dave/Vinayak, > > My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF > legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting on > this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it c

Re: Project reboot proposals - any guidance?

Hi Nick, I did a somewhat cursory review of the 10 years of emails in the XML Beans archives and have some definite ideas about governance. I don't think that they are for discussion yet - it will be up to the podling community. Regards, Dave On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Oct 11, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >>> Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks >>> l

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

Sent from my iPhone On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 7 November 2013 11:20, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >> >>> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to >>> reward merit earned by indiv

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

I don't think this is prudent, having only one binding vote is too low a check. We at the ASF have a responsibility to the public. I want to be certain that no one steam rolls the process. Just the fact that there are edge cases means we need to be careful. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone O

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

I agree. Lowering our standards is not a solution. There are three binding votes required for many good reasons. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Unlikely to get at least Roy’s approval because release > votes are expected to be a decisi

Re: Shepherding November 2013

Hi - Apologies for not getting around to it. I've been on the road and work continues to be a grind. Aurora is starting out and Open Climate Workbench looks fine - graduation soon? That was my initial look at the start, and then oops time's up. Regards, Dave On Nov 11, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Marvi

Re: Populating the initial PPMC

Dislike. For small projects, PPMC == Committers is a great starting point. For huge projects like OpenOffice something like this would have been chaos unleashed. If it were 3 or 4 then I would not have volunteered to be a Mentor for Apache Flex. To me the answer should remain somewhere betwee

Re: Release vote thresholds

too hung up on vetting releases is the be all and >>> end all of PMC membership when really there are other just as if not more >>> important things. >> >> Let's say we strike that bullet point from the proposal. It seems like we're >> making good pr

[DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

How many +1 IPMC Binding Votes did you have from your Mentors? Putting this information clearly in the thread is very helpful. Regards, Dave On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:09 AM, larry mccay wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. > > A vote was held

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

So we vote to make Till an IPMC member and then we have a proposal to allow VXQuery to have a non-Apache Member cast the only IPMC binding VOTE on a release. Sorry, but that is one step too many. Here is my proposal - see if invoking the old experiment (making a pdling PPMC member into an IPMC

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

Hi Alex, I like where you are going with this, but I think that rather than invent a new role within the ASF we might actually be on the track to how we make the IPMC more like a normal PMC. What you are calling IP Auditors is really one example of "Incubator Committer" - there are two kinds o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

Hi, Apologies for returning to this after one week, but I have been on vacation. I am not against this experiment in general, especially after Bertrand's later clarification. I am against the experiment in VXQuery's case because Till has already been made an IPMC member under the prior experim

Re: Release vote thresholds

On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction. >> >> Dave, I

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Marvin, I applaud your efforts here. If we are going to take PPMC release votes as binding then we should be sure that these are up to standards. Even if we don't this is still very valuable. One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release steps are "optional" when

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release >> steps are "optional" when they are required. > > Don't get me wron

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote: > On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> ...In response to Bertrand's proposal at , I've >>> created >>> a draft release verification ch

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote: >>> ... But it is much harder to update an SVN document compared with replying >>> to an e-mail. >> >>

Re: Release Verification Checklist

There is a small negative to this process. How do non-committers VOTE on releases? This doesn't make me negative, but we ought to have an explanation. On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> Which we already have a

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/votes/$PODLING/$RC >>> ... >> >> Added to a new "us

Re: Release vote thresholds

On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF. >> I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation. > > I

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Dec 12, 2013, at 2:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> I also went another round on the Manifest template and the Release Procedure >> section of the guide (not yet committed): https://paste.apache.org/a1ya ... > >

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote. Regards, Dave On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > As the next step in our ongoing

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

I guess Marvin can't count to the fourth Dave. I also voted +1. Between Ant's and Chip's votes. On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. >> [ ] -1 No, do not apply

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > January 2014 Incubator report timeline: > >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2014 FYI - Helix has graduated so I have removed it from the report. Regards, Dave >Wed January 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day >Sun Ja

[CELIX] Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

m. To me it is the ability to get three proper +1 VOTEs on releases. Anyway - go CELIX! Let's see if 2014 is a magical year. Regards, Dave On Dec 26, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> January 2014

Re: Hoya Proposal

On Jan 13, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 9 January 2014 21:55, Enis Söztutar wrote: > >> Proposal looks good. Let me know if you need any additional help in >> mentors. >> >> Enis >> > > +1 -I'd really like input from the HBase and Accumulo teams as they are the > first apps w

Re: Shepherding February 2014

Sorry my limited Apache time was taken yesterday by catching up "cadence" issues. I checked DataFu and it is getting started in fine shape. The mentors are doing a fine job. I checked Hadoop Development Tools and there is some concern. Development is either stalled since November when dependen

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Your wayward mentor agrees. Sorry I have lacked time to review this release. Regards, Dave On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote: > Thanks :-) > > Discussion about graduation will start soon... > > Stephan > > On 10.02.14 10:36, "ant elder" wrote: > >> Also, why doesn't Oling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

Hello - If someone from the IPMC would look at this release candidate it would be appreciated. (Sorry, but I have not found time myself.) Thanks, Dave On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

Hi - Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate: (1) The source should not include the KEYS file. (2) I have trouble with the build so I could not judge the build. A maven 3 build would be nice and it is beiung discussed by the podling. (3) I ran manual rat scans using Apache RAT 0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Mar 12, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate: >> >> (1) The source should not include the KEYS file. >> > > OK. Hopefully y

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

nsibility of the Apache Olingo Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Olingo Project: > > * Florian Mueller > *

Re: [VOTE] Retire the S4 podling

+1, binding. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and >> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] ab

Re: Mentors heartbeat

Hi - I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am not mentoring and not shepherding lately. I do want to add something to this debate. PMCs write their board reports to the board in whatever way they want. The Incubator is about teaching PPMCs how to become PMCs. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Aug 21, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> It is fair to require changes for the next release. It's not fair to use >> different criteria for two successive, essentially identical releases. > > When the option to be "fair" ex

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Aug 24, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> Returning to this topic after an intermission... >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> wrote: On

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Aug 24, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Returning to this topic after an intermission... > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote: >>> ...As one of the active developers I would have a serious

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Aug 26, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > AOO doesn't need to change anything to their current release processes > other than to stop pointing source downloads at svn (which is the sole > reason I won't vote for AOO candidates). Well this is worth discussion. On this page [1]: The sou

September Reports

Hi, It is about time to prepare for September Board Reports, isn't it? Regards, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sep 6, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/26/12 7:44 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> - Original Message - >> >>> From: Dave Fisher >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 1:08 PM

Ambari - Re: September Reports

l see, but they aren't stuck! Regards, Dave On Sep 8, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for > this month: > > Benson Margulies - Cordova, Flex, S4 > Dave Fisher - Ambari, HCatalog

HCatalog - Re: September Reports

Sep 8, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for > this month: > > Benson Margulies - Cordova, Flex, S4 > Dave Fisher - Ambari, HCatalog > Jukka Zitting- Bloodhound, Kalumet, OpenOffi

Fwd: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

e OpenOffice PMC Starting Membership: > Andre Fischer (af) > Andrea Pescetti (pescetti) > Andrew Rist (arist) > Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch) > Armin Le Grand (alg) > Dave Fisher (wave) > Donald Harbison (dpharbison) > Drew J

Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

at 8:07 PM, Joe Schaefer >>>> wrote: >>>>> No, just like Upayavira doesn't. >>>> >>>> Oh, I thought he was just a person-of-single-name, like a number of >>>> people I've met (often from Indonesia). >>>> >>>&

Re: [VOTE] Recommend to the Board to establish the Apache OpenOffice Project

chair of the Apache OpenOffice Project, and to >> have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope >> of responsibility of the Apache OpenOffice Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby

Re: Preparing for the October reports

Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting >>> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reviews, Benso

Re: [VOTE] Recommend to the Board to establish the Apache OpenOffice Project

On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > Unless I'm mistaken, the list of PMC members below includes a single > individual (Dave Fisher) who's active in more than just the OO > project, all others have joined the ASF via OO incubation. >

Re: Celix status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "October2012" by PepijnNoltes)

On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report, Celix! > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Apache Wiki wrote: >> We have prepared the code base and website for release and we are >> very close to making a release. > > Great stuff! Hopefully the release proce

Re: Kitty status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by AlessandroNovarini)

It looks like the VOTE thread is +3 for retirement. And has digressed into what will happen with the code. Would someone care to call the RESULT, or should the IPMC declare it done and proceed with retirement? Regards, Dave On Sep 24, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Kitty project from incubation

+1 to retire the Kitty podling. On Oct 14, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > +1 retire Kitty > > Sent from my tablet > On Oct 14, 2012 4:16 PM, "Kevan Miller" wrote: > >> All, >> The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the >> retirement vote to the Incubator P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.9-incubating

Om, Signatures checked. License and notices checked. Here is the third IPMC +1. Congratulations and well-done! Installer looks like it is running fine, but that is not required. Regards, Dave On Nov 10, 2012, at 11:29 PM, Om wrote: > Thanks Bertrand! > > We still need a third IPMC member vo

Shepherd Assignments?

Hi Benson / Jukka - I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments. Regards, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[Shepherd] Amber

Hi - I've added the following to the November report wiki: I think that Amber is ready to graduate - the traffic on the ML is down but indicates that some might use Amber if it were a TLP. I see starts to the process, I think that the mentors just need to give the podling some nudges. Some sta

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flex podling from Apache Incubator

On Nov 22, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Flex podling from Apache >> Incubator... > > +1 > > -Bertrand (Flex mentor) +1 for Flex Graduation. Dave (Flex mentor and continuing

Re: Committership of a podling

On Nov 22, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Craig L Russell wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 14:16:28 -0800: >> If there is a difference between committers and PMC members of a >> graduating podling, I don't think there is any process for identifying >> which podling committers are to be

Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

+1 binding Sent from my iPhone On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:28 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi there, > > Following the discussion thread, here is the formal vote on the Marmotta > proposal: > > Please cast your votes on whether to accept the Apache Marmotta proposal: > > [ ] +1 Accept Marmotta into

Re: checking on the shepherd inventory (or, 3.14159 IPMC members ...)

Hi Benson, I liked that Jukka assigned me to random podlings as this exposes me to new ideas. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Benson Margulies wrote

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OpenMeetings from Incubator

+1 ipmc Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > +1 (mentor) > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:50 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Dear Incubation members, >> >> During incubation, OpenMeetings has : >> * Produced 1 Release >> * Added 5 new Committer/PPMC member

Re: Some missing things for the December report

On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> I took these notes yesterday, so please excuse me if some of these >> have been fixed. >> >> etch: no signoffs > > Just did my signoff and added a personal observation: > > The

Re: Some missing things for the December report

n VOTE underway with 3 +1 out of the 5 proposed PMC members. My third shove's success is unknown... Regards, Dave > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 9

Re: Some missing things for the December report

On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> I would be most grateful if the shepherd was willing to give the stone >> a shove down that hill. > > Martjin deserves all the credit, but two shoves (

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Etch podling from Apache Incubator

+1. Let's go etch! On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Martin Veith wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Etch podling from Apache > Incubator. > > The Apache Etch project entered the Incubator in September 2008. > Since then it has had ups and downs but we feel ready for graduation

Re: First attempt at January2013 report template

On Dec 29, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I've used my improved clutch2report.py tool to push a template for > January 2013. It includes some extra bits to help me (or anyone else) > notice missing signoffs and reports. I like these. Prior versions were sorted alphabetically by na

Re: Shepherds

On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> I've assigned some sheperds > > > I'm a bit late on my reviews, should have them done tomorrow. I've done one of mine - Celix. I'll continue my look at Chukwa soon. From t

Chukwa - Shepherds Report

Hi - I see from late November discussions about Ant and Jukka becoming new Mentors for Chukwa. I see a VOTE for retirement with one voter continuing afterwards. Retirement? Regards, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub

Re: Chukwa - Shepherds Report

On Jan 10, 2013, at 6:58 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> I see from late November discussions about Ant and Jukka becoming new >> Mentors for Chukwa. >> >> I see a VOTE for re

Re: Tashi report for January 2013

Hi, I looked at your draft here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tashi/board/2013-01.txt?revision=1430519&view=markup "Items to be resolved before graduation: * Generate more publicity for the project. * Develop members of the user community to submit feature extensions."

Re: [DISCUSS] Expressing priorities about release reviews

On Jan 12, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Yes you make a good point- that any effort > towards review is welcome and appreciated. > It's just that having an exclusive focus > on the things we can actually review here, > namely adherence to License and Notice policy, > can leave people w

Re: Thoughts about formalizing the role of shepherd

On Jan 14, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > ... >> The problem I'm looking at is indeed the chronic lack of reliable >> mentor presence in the projects, as witnessed (maybe) by the signoff >> statistics in January. > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Crunch Podling from the Incubator

+1 Best of luck Captains On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Josh Wills wrote: > This is a call to graduate the Apache Crunch podling from Apache Incubator. > > Apache Crunch entered the Incubator in May of 2012. We have made > significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache. We have

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Folks, > > OK, now that discussion has settled down, I'd like to call a VOTE for > acceptance of Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator. > I'll leave the VOTE open the rest of the week and close it out next >

Re: [PROPOSAL] BeanShell join the Apache Incubator

Hi, This does look interesting. I'd like to help and have added myself as a project Mentor if that is alright. Regards, Dave On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thanks :-) > > Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity > On 18 Feb 2013 20:02, "Simone Tripodi

Re: no shepherds assignments this time?

On Feb 13, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Matt Franklin wrote: > On Wednesday, February 13, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Indeed, the wiki format made rather a mess of this. >> >> I'm sorry, my degree of day-job-distraction has been kind of extreme. >> Please do just dive in however you all see fit, pe

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> wrote: >>> Hi Benson, >>> >>> >>> On 2/26/13 2:17 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > >>> >>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times, >>> projects aim for being very successful and have

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

t; Upayavira > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 05:52 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> On 2/27/13 9:44 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >> >>> [..snip..] >> >> Thanks for the examples. >> >>> Each cas

Fwd: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])

Hey Folks, Etch has graduated and is now a TLP, correct? It's board reports should now go directly to board@ from the PMC chair. Regards, Dave Begin forwarded message: > From: Marvin > Date: March 4, 2013 4:18:48 AM PST > To: d...@etch.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Incubator PMC/Board repor

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

I think that this vote should be invalidated. Are the five binding votes from IPMC members? It is not 5. Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable? If two members of the IPMC step forward to Mentor MRQL I might change my mind. Regards, Dave On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Edw

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Matt Franklin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu >>> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote

Re: Identifying and removing inactive mentors

On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Upayavira wrote: >> ...Simple rule. If mentors don't sign two reports in a row, >> shepherd checks they are subscribed to the dev list, and then contacts >> them asking if they still want to be involved. I

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Ross, > > I disagree. Chris' proposal removes the IPMC thus making the board >> legally responsible for everything that committee does today. Yes it replaces >>> it with an oversight body, but how does that scale?

Re: [Shepherds] Incubator report reminders sent for Apr 2013

Hi, Sorry, I just realized I had replied in private and this is a comment for general@. Regards, Dave On Apr 1, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > I added a Shepherd signup area at the front of the report wiki page. > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013 > >

Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus)

On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> ...Chris proposes that this >> committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be replaced, in >> large part, by the board itself. Every board member who has been heard >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] BeanShell join the Apache Incubator

On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 18/02/2013 Simone Tripodi wrote: >> feel free to join the list if you are interested, I am sure you would >> be more than welcome! > > I added myself to the "interested people" at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal > but I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >