I agree. Lowering our standards is not a solution. There are three binding votes required for many good reasons.
Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Unlikely to get at least Roy’s approval because release > votes are expected to be a decision of the full committee, > not any one member of it. > > On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 10, 2013, at 1:04 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that >>> they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it >>> at least three votes only one of which must be binding. That would >>> mean there would still be the element of oversight that a mentor vote >>> gives but avoids all the problems with not having three mentors. I'm >>> sure the board would grant the Incubator authority to implement that >>> change. >> >> The board has charged us to vet the podlings and their releases. What >> process is used is up to us. >> >> I would prefer a variant of your proposal. The first release needs three >> mentor/IPMC votes. Subsequent releases only require one mentor/IPMC vote. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
