On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote: >>> ... But it is much harder to update an SVN document compared with replying >>> to an e-mail. >> >> Someone running the VOTE would need to update SVN as each vote comes in. >> >> There would need to be an email reference attached for each VOTE.... > > Not in my suggestion - people who review releases work directly on the > svn document, enter their comments there and that counts as a +1 > towards the release. > > A big part of this is teaching people that reviewing a release is not > just about dropping a +1 in email - we want them, especially for early > incubating releases, to indicate what they reviewed and what they > didn't. Working on this in svn (as the board does for its meetings) is > efficient, leads to a concise manifest that's easy to review and > overall a much clearer process, IMO, than complaints in long email > threads.
Sure, then we need an svn tree that every IPMC and podling can edit. Votes show up in the commit log. Regards, Dave > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
