On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
>> > basic shepherding work (since I pulled t
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
> > basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
>
> Nah, its cool. I've initiate
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
> basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
Nah, its cool. I've initiated all the required steps and updated the website.
At this point, we're
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
John
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:06:51 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:01 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
>>
>>
> Yep, added a retired section.
>
> John
>
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
>
>
Yep, added a retired section.
John
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So, at this point, is this
We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
>> resolution summary.
>>
>>
> Nevermind, got thrown off in my sea
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
> resolution summary.
>
>
Nevermind, got thrown off in my search by a late vote. I just retired them
from podlings.xml and will remove them from the board report shortly,
unl
So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
resolution summary.
John
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanda
+1 (non-binding)
-Taylor
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
>> for the NPanday poddling.
>>
>> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
>> the NPa
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this point:
> htt
+1 [sadly]
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:13PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this poin
+1 (binding)
On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this point
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...We had a vote thread about a month ago: http://s.apache.org/HIF ...
And I voted -1 at that time (http://s.apache.org/Vqa) but my concern
has been addressed, hence my +1 above.
-Bertrand
---
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> On Wednesday, 21 January 2015, 23:15, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >T his is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:03 AM, jonathon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 21/01/15 22:19, jan i wrote:
>> +1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
>> support has to be terminated at a point.
>
> Isn't this the podling that requested reti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 22:19, jan i wrote:
> +1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
> support has to be terminated at a point.
Isn't this the podling that requested retirement months ago, and was
told to give it one more try?
jona
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
+1 but it looks like a few people are interested in using and working on
that code, please make sure clear instructions are given to them about how
they can fo
+1
Regards,
Alan
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 Recommend retiring NPanday poddling from the Incubator.
> [ ] +/-0 Don't care, but...
> [ ] -1 Don't recommend retiring NPanday poddling from the Incubator because
> ...
+1
It's a cool idea, but the technology direction has gone a different way.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and
+1
Retirement isn't a failure. It is just one of several options. Not every
projects needs to continue on original form, and not every project needs to
be at Apache.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanda
+1 to retire. The half full aspect is that it looks like people are
doing something more useful with their time.
Hadrian
On 01/21/2015 05:19 PM, jan i wrote:
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesda
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the gen
+1
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this poi
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Let's cancel this vote and have at least Cos send them a note saying "many
> of us in the IPMC think you should retire" (but more nicely/PC). Give them
> 72 hours to provide feedback
+1, after that I'm ok to vote on retirement.
-Ber
t; > get
> > > drowned in the noise.
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Konstantin Boud
> -Original Message-
> From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
> Shaposhnik
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>
> On Thu, Dec
community. Remember not everyone reads general@ and those that do
> often
> > get
> > > drowned in the noise.
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> > >
> >
the noise.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
> > To:
c.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>
> Actual
: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
nal Message-
From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
Shaposhnik
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised the flag about project's issues on the general@ before. As
far as I can tell this whole discussion about NPanday is going on for about a
year now (by very modest e
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent
> then maybe the problem
> doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
The only active mentors left on the project seem to be of an
opini
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent then
maybe the problem doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
A VOTE should be a formality used on the few occasions where our bye-laws
require them. It certainly should not, IMHO, be a stick to wave in
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
>> for the NPanday poddling...
>
> -1 for now.
>
> Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
> NPand
Wow - thanks for your diligence Bertrand. I support this -1 unless Bertrand
made a mistake.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:02 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling...
-1 for now.
Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
NPanday mailing list at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-npa
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> NPanday entered incubator on 13th of August 2010:
>http://incubator.apache.org/projects/npanday.html
> Up until 2012 the poddling was doi
+1.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Roman Shaposhnik
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>This is a vote on recommending a retirem
40 matches
Mail list logo
