On 4/25/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone help me find the answer to the following questions that I
posted:
> Speaking of which, where is the official place to upload the
> release artifact to
i don't know. hopefully people will jump in.
and what is the offi
On Sunday 22 April 2007 20:44, George Aroush wrote:
> Speaking of which, where is the office place to upload the release artifact
> to and what is the official mailing list to make the announcement? Is
> there an ASF document I can read to learn all about this?
Check http://www.apache.org/dev/#r
Hi folks,
Can someone help me find the answer to the following questions that I
posted:
> Speaking of which, where is the official place to upload the
> release artifact to and what is the official mailing list to
> make the announcement? Is there an ASF document I can read
> to learn all ab
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:04 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
>
> +
> From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
>
> Hi Niclas,
>
> Thanks for your +1 vote, but
Approve the release of Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
>
> Hi Niclas,
>
> Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
>
> This now gives me:
>
> +1 from Erik Hatcher
> +1 from Niclas Hedhman
> +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
>
> I
Hi Niclas,
Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
This now gives me:
+1 from Erik Hatcher
+1 From Niclas Hedhman
+0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
I still need 1 more +1 to get this release out. Can at least one other PMC
member review this release please?
> Personally, I think t
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg problem.
> Without releases no users, without users no developers, without developers no
> releases.
> Somehow it also feels to me that either dotNet has no credibility at ASF, or
> that ASF has no credibi
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:54, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg problem.
> Without releases no users, without users no developers, without developers
> no releases.
I also think that the advice recently given to FtpServer project (also a
s
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 08:41, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please jump in and vote on this release. It has been well
> over 4 weeks since my original submission. What will it take
> to get this vote moving? Is there anything more that I need to do?!
Personally, I think the project i
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
>
> Thanks Erik!
>
> Folks: Can others jump on this too, review the releas
29, 2007 10:45 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0
build 004 incubating
I've waited out on the vote intentionally to see what others hand.
The licensing issues that RAT turned up seem minor to me, especially being
in
On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To
>> answer your
>> questions:
>>
>> The files *
o: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
Lucene.Net 2.0
build 004 incubating
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To answer
your
questions:
The files *.csproj, a
an go back and
re-package the release for a new vote.
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:22 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucen
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To
answer your
questions:
The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET project
files --
those ar
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To answer your
questions:
The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET project files --
those are auto generated and thus I can't edit them outside the IDE -- the
ache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0
build 004 incubating
On 3/20/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
hi George
apologies for the delay
(i'll try to be quicker next time)
> This is a re-vote request for the relea
On 3/20/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
hi George
apologies for the delay
(i'll try to be quicker next time)
This is a re-vote request for the release of Incubating Apache Lucene.Net
2.0 build 004. I have addressed the issues raised from the previous vote
request.
Hi Folks,
Can 3 PMC folks look into this release request? Tomorrow, it will be a week
since I posted this request and as far as I can tell, no one looked into it
yet.
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 20
20 matches
Mail list logo
