Hi folks, Please jump in and vote on this release. It has been well over 4 weeks since my original submission. What will it take to get this vote moving? Is there anything more that I need to do?!
Thanks! -- George Aroush > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:41 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache > Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating > > Thanks Erik! > > Folks: Can others jump on this too, review the release and > offer their +/-1 vote? So far I have: > > +1 from Erik Hatcher > +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin > > Needless to say, this seems to me to be taking longer then I > hoped for. As you know, I need at least 2 +1's to make the > release -- so please help and review the release. > > Here are the artifacts again: > > Release history: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Luc > ene.Net_2_0_0/ > src/HISTORY.txt > > Release artifact (source & binary): > http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-004/ > > I'm asking for your vote to approve this release. > > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache Lucene.Net 2.0.0 build > 004 incubating > > [ ] -1 Veto this release (explain why so it can be addressed) > > Regards, > > -- George Aroush > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:45 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache > Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating > > I've waited out on the vote intentionally to see what others hand. > The licensing issues that RAT turned up seem minor to me, > especially being in project files that are not part of a > binary distribution and probably not even needed for > compilation of the codebase in general. > > So... > > +1 on this release > > Erik > > > On Mar 28, 2007, at 9:55 PM, George Aroush wrote: > > > Thanks Robert! No, you don't have to feel bad about your > +0 vote, you > > did your part. > > > > All: Please review this release and give me your vote so I can move > > this release on. At least, let me know if what Robert > found is (the > > one file that has old license header) is a release stopper > so I can go > > back and re-package the release for a new vote. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George Aroush > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:22 PM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache > Lucene.Net > > 2.0 build 004 incubating > > > > On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Robert, > >> > >> Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. > To answer > >> your > >> questions: > >> > >> The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET > project files > >> -- those are auto generated and thus I can't edit them outside the > >> IDE > >> -- the same goes to the few *.cs files that you noticed as well as > >> the few *.xml and *.html files that you highlighted. > > > > yeh > > > > IMHO it's pretty naffy that you can't add headers but > that's life, i > > suppose > > - or at least m$ > > > >> For the file, > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/ > >> contr > >> ib/Sno wball.Net/Test/Analysis/Snowball/TestSnowball.cs where you > >> pointed out the use of the old style Apache License, it looks like > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-update-scripts > >> didn't > >> do the job well here. This is an original work -- will this issue > >> prevent a release?. > > > > different people have different opinions :-/ > > > > (hopefully people will jump in here) > > > > IMHO it's a judgment call. i wouldn't cut a release with any header > > issues of this kind but i wouldn't -1 one either. > > > > RAT is good at catching this kind of issue (though it will > pick up a > > lot of false negatives for the XML and HTML files) > > > >> Thanks for catching the grammatical error in the > README.txt: "An MADN > >> ..." > >> I fixed it in the SVN release. > >> > >> Again, thanks for taking your time and looking at this release > >> candidate. > >> Please let me know if I addressed all of your questions > and if I get > >> your +1 or -1 vote. > > > > +0 due to old license > > > > (but i feel a little bad about it) > > > > - robert > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
