I agree with you howard. It just doesn't matter that I agree. The
trouble is the wording doesn't make it clear in Java althought I agree
the intent of the license is what you say.
I asked Sam Ruby about this and he said something to the effect of
without clarification would you want to leave
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
See, that's the part I don't get. I know this is tedious if you've been
through this, but I don't see how the LGPL is viral (the GPL is definitely
viral, by design).
Some pointers:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1606
is what should be chan
> Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> > | Actually, this is present Apache policy. You can't link
> to them at
> > | all. Sorry.
> >
> > Why on earth can't Apache link to LGPL libraries? What's with you
> > guys? Have you heard about something called "the open source
> > community"? It's about reusing
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> | Actually, this is present Apache policy. You can't link to them at
> | all. Sorry.
>
> Why on earth can't Apache link to LGPL libraries? What's with you guys?
> Have you heard about something called "the open source community"? It's
> about reusing code n'allthat...
ha
| Actually, this is present Apache policy. You can't link to them at
| all. Sorry.
Why on earth can't Apache link to LGPL libraries? What's with you guys?
Have you heard about something called "the open source community"? It's
about reusing code n'allthat...
Endre.
---
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Once both of those are resolved I'll change that to a +1 not before.
While I agree that the incubator in its current form has been a
wasteful excercise. The incubation period itself proved useful in
that it exposed issues that I
Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm quite wi
; From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:00 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
> >
> >
> > Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'm quite wil
-
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
>
>
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm quite willing to help flush out a full projec
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just
configuring gump is a royal pain in the butt.
Pppbbbttt.
Apparently creating the following is beyond Andy's abilities:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcv
Votes should not take place on the pmc list.
Tapestry has a vibrant community, that has already suffered too much
from our incubation "experiment", and that is well taken care of by
Dion, Andy, and all the other Jakarta friends.
I thereby bropose that we "release" Tapestry so that it becomes
o
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm quite willing to help flush out a full project definition once I
get past the roadblocks. The question is: what should be done about
the apparent jboss prereq?
Theoretically it no longer exists (howard's answer to my previous issue
with the licensing issues) ;-)
Here
I'm quite willing to help flush out a full project definition once I
get past the roadblocks. The question is: what should be done about
the apparent jboss prereq?
Theoretically it no longer exists (howard's answer to my previous issue
with the licensing issues) ;-)
But as mark pilgram said.
Sam, from what I've found, there's no real dependency on jboss for the
framework jar.
Servlet api, xml-apis etc, but not necessarily jboss.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECT
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just
configuring gump is a royal pain in the butt.
Pppbbbttt.
Apparently creating the following is beyond Andy's abilities:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakar
Cool. Thanks Dion. You rock.
-Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/03/2003 10:33:25 AM:
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
All audit issues have been taken care of, per the schedule I posted on
the
Audit.
What about jfreechart a
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just
configuring gump is a royal pain in the butt.
Pppbbbttt.
Apparently creating the following is beyond Andy's abilities:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-gump/project/jakar
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/03/2003 10:33:25 AM:
> Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> >All audit issues have been taken care of, per the schedule I posted on
the
> >Audit.
> >
>
> What about jfreechart and jcommon?
>
> I also don't buy that JAXP is ASL. Its that funky sun
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just configuring
gump is a royal pain in the butt.
Pppbbbttt.
Apparently creating the following is beyond Andy's abilities:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-gump/project/jakarta-tapestry.xml?rev=
Andy
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
-Original Message-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tapestry development
Subject
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:17 am, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> All audit issues have been taken care of, per the schedule I posted on the
> Audit.
>
> The GPL module and all code that imports it no longer exists (we could
> remove the ,v file from the repository I suppose).
> The LPGL modules used in
s/tapestry
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tapestry development
> Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
>
>
> -1 until a
-1 until all audit issues are resolved:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryAudits/Feb2003 -
Its my duty as a member of the foundation and as a sponsoring member of
tapestry to sit watch over this and I take it seriously.
and until Tapestry builds under Gump. (not an official
Conor MacNeill wrote, On 11/03/2003 8.26:
With respect to Tapestry, I agree. I think the incubator PMC should perhaps
vote to promote it into Jakarta. The current limbo is not fair to the people
involved.
ACK.
Tapestry has a vibrant community, that has already suffered too much
from our incuba
24 matches
Mail list logo
