All audit issues have been taken care of, per the schedule I posted on the Audit.
What about jfreechart and jcommon?
I also don't buy that JAXP is ASL. Its that funky sun license. http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryAudits/Feb2003
If the demos are linked to LGPL it is the boards current position that they cannot be part of the project. I've emailed for clarification on this to the FSF's lawyer. Next step, I email stallman. We'll see if this changes.
The GPL module and all code that imports it no longer exists (we could
remove the ,v file from the repository I suppose).
The LPGL modules used in demos are no longer in the repository, or shippped
as part of the demo.
If you can get specific exemption from those projects that they intend that you can link without any license terms infecting your code, then
you can probably get a dispensation (I'd query the board first). The problem is that most projects will be like "yeah thats what LGPL means"...
some may understand your unique political situation and be like "cool we're used in an apache project" but I guess it depends.
Dion is helping out with Maven integraton. I'm tapped out in terms ofYou can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just configuring gump is a royal pain in the butt. I figured
bandwidth and haven't had time to learn Maven. This is the first step to
Gump integration, right?
that if Maven is Gump-integrated then it should be easier to mavenize and take advantage of maven's gump integration.
The same is achievable via Centipede but one could presume you'd loose Dions help if you went that route and I'm very
tapped at the moment.
Thanks,
Andy
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tapestry development
Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
-1 until all audit issues are resolved: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryAudits/Feb2003 - Its my duty as a member of the foundation and as a sponsoring member of tapestry to sit watch over this and I take it seriously.
and until Tapestry builds under Gump. (not an official requirement just mine as a sponsoring member)
Once both of those are resolved I'll change that to a +1 not before. While I agree that the incubator in its current form has been a wasteful excercise. The incubation period itself proved useful in that it exposed issues that I was not aware of (regarding GPL jars used in example code).
I'm torn, I consider the incubator itself to be a failure and the process (or lack there of) to have dragged on, but the "incubation period" has itself been useful if only for this purpose. Take that as a statement of support supposing you seriously refactor and rescope (smaller) the incubator.
-Andy
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Conor MacNeill wrote, On 11/03/2003 8.26:takes it in
With respect to Tapestry, I agree. I think the incubator PMC shouldACK.
perhaps vote to promote it into Jakarta. The current limbo is not fair to the people involved.
Tapestry has a vibrant community, that has already suffered too much
from our incubation "experiment", and that is well taken care of by Dion, Andy, and all the other Jakarta friends.
I thereby bropose that we "release" Tapestry so that it becomes
officially part of Jakarta, and that the Jakarta PMC fully
charge.
Incubator PMCers, please cast your votes.
Mine: +1
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
