...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
After clearing up some questions and getting an SGA from IBM to make
sure, the IP Clearance of the "Atomos Codebase" contribution passes.
We will proceed to incorporate the code in Felix.
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...
ike the SGA may need to come from them.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@in
> > I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was relicensed,
> > removing IBM specific headers. If the code never had IBM licensing on it,
> > this would be a very easy +1 but because of the relicensing, it's a -1 from
> > me until we get an SGA from IBM.
>
> I'll talk with Tom ab
> Do we have an ICLA from Stefan Bischof as
> well? It looks like his contributions are post-relicensing but wanted to
> check.
Yes, we have an ICLA form Stefan Bischof.
regards,
Karl
> John
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:08 AM Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> > Let me try to
work with
him on that. Is that what we want?
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:18 AM Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Thomas Watson is from IBM and should be covered by their CCLA and has
subscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
ode - there are only some profiles that contain that notice.
regards,
Karl
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h.
g
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
iCLA on file.
regards,
Karl
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apac
The Apache Felix project has received an "Atomos" contribution from
Thomas Watson.
Atomos is a Java module framework using OSGi Connect which is a
proposal (RFC) for the upcoming OSGI R8 Core specification.
- A snapshot of the code, that is already ALv2, is available in a
github repo: [0]
- The I
> +2020-02-07
> +
> +
> +
> Weex UI
>
> Apache Weex (Incubating)
>
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cvs-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail
IP Clearance of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
contribution passes by lazy consensus.
We will proceed to incorporate the code in Felix.
regards,
Karl
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> The Apache Felix project has received a "Logback integrati
IP Clearance of the "System Readiness Check Framework" contribution
passes by lazy consensus.
We will proceed to incorporate the code in Felix.
regards,
Karl
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> The Apache Felix project has received a "System Readiness
The Apache Felix project has received a "System Readiness Check
Framework" contribution from Andrei Dulvac and Christian Schneider.
- A snapshot of the code is available in a github repo: [0]
- The IP Clearance form has been committed [1]
- The acceptance vote has passed on the d...@felix.apache.o
The Apache Felix project has received a "Logback integration with OSGi
Log 1.4" contribution from Raymond Auge.
- A snapshot of the code is available in a github repo: [0]
- The IP Clearance form has been committed [1]
- The acceptance vote has passed on the d...@felix.apache.org mailing list [2]
As we waited another 72 hours and no -1 has been cast the ip clearance
has been accepted and we will proceed to incorporate the code in
Felix.
regards,
Karl
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Great!
>
> I think we can just resume this vote. I updated the ip-clear
Yes, an ICLA on file should suffice.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:07 PM Karl Pauls wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> we have an ICLA for Jessica now.
>>
>> However, Intel is maintaining the position that it shouldn't be
>> required to identi
ence:
Are you willing to withdraw your veto based on the ICLA and the given CCLA?
Otherwise, I guess I'll go and ask legal to see if they can clear this up.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> John,
>
> yeah, I see that the schedule B is somewhat
ip/tar archive with checksum & md5 listed OR
> - A list of files
>
> As well as:
>
> - ICLA(s) on file for the individual(s).
>
> So you could also do another CCLA but listing out one of those two items
> above, as well as request an ICLA from Jessica Marz.
>
> J
m what documents need to be in place to remove the
> Intel copyright claim (typically those would go in to the NOTICE file for
> Apache Felix going forward). This is typically done as an SGA [1].
>
> John
>
> [1]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf
&
y.
>
> So, unfortunately, until that's resolved I'm -1 to accepting it.
>
> [1]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:03 AM Karl Pauls wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> as far as I understand the situation, the contribut
AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please clarify whether only a CCLA was received, or if ICLAs/SGA
> were received as well? The document indicates a CCLA was received from an
> individual, which doesn't sound right.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:
consensus if no -1 votes are cast within
the next 72 hours.
regards,
Karl
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5732
[1]
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-bar-file-install-extension.html
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg44409.html
--
Karl Pauls
Incubator because ...
>
> The proposal is listed below, but you can also access it on the wiki:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal
>
> - Sam Ruby
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To u
pache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
-
To unsub
serve as the initial members of the
> Apache ACE Project:
>
> * Angelo van der Sijpt
> * Brian Topping
> * Clement Escoffier
> * Carsten Ziegeler
> * Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> * Kar
de Kruijff, Angelo van der Sijpt*, Carsten Ziegeler***,
and Karl Pauls***.
* No other votes
As we have 4 binding IPMC +1, the vote is successful. I'll make the
artifacts available as soon as possible.
* == PPMC
** == IPMC
***
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 16:54, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 8
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>>> The
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>> The vote on "Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects" has been
>>> running for 72h and we didn't see any more
that it is a big
release) I'm going to call this vote successful based on the 4 IPMC
member votes we did already get. In that case, however, I don't want
to see it debated again during graduation i.e., speak now or forever
hold your peace.
regards,
Karl
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:5
x27;d like to continue the vote on general@ now to get the IPMC
approval -- hence,
Please vote to approve this release.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Time to call the vote on the ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects releases.
>
> * +1 votes from Marcel Offe
t;Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:23 AM
>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate ACE from the Apache Incubator
>>
>>On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:11 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:03 P
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:11 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> On 11/21/11 09:41 , ant elder wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at
hich no
> one is saying is a major issue.
No, he had two remarks, one about the tags and one about the source releases.
regards,
Karl
> ...ant
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> Well, I agree and disagree at the same time :-).
>>
>&g
ource distribution that contained all the source for all
> those modules along with a build script to build them, and IMHO your
> mentors should have helped you do that. Would you consider doing
> another release like this before you graduate?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>> Again, I'm not against doing things diffe
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
>> configured like this
e used the tags scm
> with Maven sub-modules.
> So I'm quite sure that reverting just before the 0.8.0-incubator, I can
> prepare that for the next ACE release.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/17/2011 04:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>
>> Again, I'm not against d
and
into a separate thread unless you disagree.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 14:07, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> $ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
>> $ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
>&
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:30, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> > I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
>> > as such has been accepted
about building this?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> Again, we had this discussion before namely, when the actual release
>> vote happened. I'm still confused why we have to go through this
>> again. You should b
ases/
>>>
>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ace/
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ge
ull source.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
>> as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
>> be one r
ecome unmanageable very quickly, if every release
> adds another 63 directory entries under releases/
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ace/
>
> -
> To unsubsc
|TDF]]
>> [[http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:DrewJensen|OpenOffice]]
>> ||yes ||
>> ||Graham Lauder || yori...@openoffice.org ||!OpenOffice.org !MarCon
>> [[http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html|(Marketing Contact) New
>> Zealand]] || ||
>&g
The 72 hours lazy consensus for the IPMC are up and we did get one
more +1 from Mohammad Nour El-Din** and no other votes.
The vote is successful and approved. I will make the artifacts available asap.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Time to call the v
elix
framework releases ever made -- hence, is available from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/KEYS
but also from:
https://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS
Hope that helps?
regards,
Karl
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
_mbox/incubator-ace-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktimw_15axkojkwvsvtdhfopvb_f...@mail.gmail.com%3e
regards,
Karl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Karl Pauls
Date: Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release ace version 0.8.0-incubator and
related subprojects
To
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
after acceptance, or should this be placed on (eg) the luminis
>>> open source server?)
>>>
>>> = Initial Source =
>>> Development of Celix started in the summer of 2010. The source currently is
>>> located on a private corporate SVN repository.
>>> All
nsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache
gt;> of these before making a release, or redistribute in binary form only.
>> The following files are affected.
>>
>> * QualityFactor.java
>> * HttpDateFormat.java
>> * HttpHeaderReaderImpl.java
>> * UriPattern.java
>> * Uri
earlier already, not the end of the world
if not.
regards,
Karl
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 09/05/2009 04:31 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>
>> The question
>> is about the scope and goals of Aries and more specifically about the
>> part where it is about being an u
gt; Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>
> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
> ---
t; richard
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.ap
ters would be
>> >> > interested in joining...
>> >> >
>> >> > --kevan
>> >> >
>> >> > -
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene...
>> >>
>>
es proposal would help. That should be
>> true for any project doing OSGi at Apache anyway, and I think the
>> other projects mentioned above are working like that, which is a Good
>> Thing,
>>
>> I'm very happy to see Guillaume as a mentor for Aries, that will
>
> Group specs, anyway. I'm sure there are flaws with my perceptions...
>>>
>>> So, we have a group that is interested in working on an enterprise OSGi
>>> application programming model at Apache (including implementations of at
>>> least so
+1
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, wrote:
> +1
> (non binding vote)
>
> francesco
>
>
>
> On 4/19/2009, "Karl Pauls" wrote:
>
>>Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache
>>Incubator. The full proposal i
Time to call the vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation.
* +1 votes from (* indicates binding votes) Carsten Ziegeler*, Niclas
Hedhman*, Richard S. Hall, Niall Pemberton*, Robert Burrell Donkin*,
Bertrand Delacretaz*, Felix Meschberger, Francesco Furfari, and Karl
Pauls.
* No other votes
ing the project:
* Marcel Offermans
* Karl Pauls
* Christian van Spaandonk
* Clement Escoffier
* Felix Meschberger
* Carsten Ziegeler
Community Members
The following people have already expressed their interest in actively
participating in this project:
* Bram de Kruijff
* Toni Menzel
* Alin Dre
There are nightly builds, lots of documentation and at least 5 people
> working on it full-time at any given point in time. If you look at the p2
> code and the OBR spec they are 90% the same thing and any differences are
> easily compensated for with a little effort.
>
> Competit
; --
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder, Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> --
>
> You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
> No o
as they used to be during incubation...
regards,
Karl
> -Bertrand
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECT
is successful. We will make
an official announcement and make the release available publicly.
Thanks to the people who reviewed and/or voted.
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
t contain much
this time around anyhow, but I agree, release notes are important.
Thanks for pointing it out and for reviewing.
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The asc and KEYS files are available on the page now.
Please start reviewing our release again. The URL stays the same:
http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-0.8.0-incubator.html
regards,
Karl
On 12/12/06, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not quite there yet.
ely good but not mandatory
- robert
We will make the asc and KEYS files available on the page mentioned
above asap (i.e., a couple of hours).
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
71 matches
Mail list logo
