Great!

I think we can just resume this vote. I updated the ip-clearance form
and will wait another 72 hours.

If no -1 is cast within the next 72 hours I will wrap it up and we
will accept the contribution into Felix.

regards,

Karl

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:50 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, an ICLA on file should suffice.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:07 PM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> we have an ICLA for Jessica now.
>>
>> However, Intel is maintaining the position that it shouldn't be
>> required to identify the software granted in detail but rather stating
>> the top-level project it is granted to should be sufficient.
>> Furthermore, they argue that they have done that many times over the
>> years and only used the project level in Schedule B.
>>
>> Personally (IANAL), I think we should be good as the size of the
>> donation isn't that big, Intel claims the copyright and has clearly
>> green lighted Jessica to contribute in their name to Felix (and we
>> have an ICLA as well) - hence:
>>
>> Are you willing to withdraw your veto based on the ICLA and the given CCLA?
>>
>> Otherwise, I guess I'll go and ask legal to see if they can clear this up.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > John,
>> >
>> > yeah, I see that the schedule B is somewhat lacking. Oh well, ok, so
>> > basically we are fine with a CCLA but in this case we don't think the
>> > provided one is explicit enough (plus we want an ICLA for Jessica
>> > Marz).
>> >
>> > I'll let them know and get back to this thread when there is either an
>> > SGA or a new CCLA with the zip name and hash + ICLA for Jessica.
>> >
>> > Thank you for looking into this!
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Karl
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Karl,
>> >>
>> >> I just read the CCLA that was filed.  I do not believe it is clear
>> enough
>> >> in the schedule B that it contains to conclude what is meant to be
>> >> included.  Since you're a chair, you should have access to it at
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/intel-corporation-felix.pdf
>> >>
>> >> Typically, to use a schedule B (as you're noting) I would expect:
>> >>
>> >> - A zip/tar archive with checksum & md5 listed OR
>> >> - A list of files
>> >>
>> >> As well as:
>> >>
>> >> - ICLA(s) on file for the individual(s).
>> >>
>> >> So you could also do another CCLA but listing out one of those two items
>> >> above, as well as request an ICLA from Jessica Marz.
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:08 AM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> John,
>> >>>
>> >>> it might typically be an SGA but it does say: "This grant can either
>> >>> be done by the ASF Corporate CLA (via Schedule B) or the Software
>> >>> Grant Agreement". Should we change that wording then?
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyways, I will follow-up with Intel via Jessica and let them know
>> >>> that the provided Corporate CLA isn't sufficient and see if they can
>> >>> provide a Software Grant Agreement instead. Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Karl
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:01 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Karl,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If the code is already Apache licensed, then I would check w/
>> secretary@
>> >>> or
>> >>> > legal-discuss@ to confirm what documents need to be in place to
>> remove
>> >>> the
>> >>> > Intel copyright claim (typically those would go in to the NOTICE
>> file for
>> >>> > Apache Felix going forward).  This is typically done as an SGA [1].
>> >>> >
>> >>> > John
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [1]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:57 AM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Hi John,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> the code has been available as AL with the Intel copyright already
>> >>> >> (the license headers in the files are unchanged). It is mainly an
>> >>> >> attempt to get it contributed to Apache Felix. I told them we need
>> the
>> >>> >> following (from the incubator ip-clearance form):
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> "A software grant must be provided to the ASF. This grant can either
>> >>> >> be done by the ASF Corporate CLA (via Schedule B) or the Software
>> >>> >> Grant Agreement. The completed and signed grant must be emailed to
>> >>> >> secret...@apache.org"
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Consequently, they send (the received) CCLA which was supposed to
>> >>> >> cover for that.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Apologies if I misunderstood the requirement. Could you please help
>> me
>> >>> >> out here and list what exactly we need from Intel and/or Jessica to
>> >>> >> get this done?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> regards,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Karl
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, John D. Ament <
>> johndam...@apache.org>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Karl,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > CCLA [1] is just a document indicating that the corporate entity
>> has
>> >>> >> given
>> >>> >> > approval for individuals associated to it to contribute to Apache
>> >>> under
>> >>> >> > ICLAs.  It really doesn't provide any legal bearing to relicense
>> code
>> >>> >> > outside of an ICLA/SGA.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Usually when projects come to us with an IP clearance, its for a
>> >>> >> > significant amount of code.  In those scenarios, there's an SGA
>> >>> >> associated
>> >>> >> > with the contribution (from a corporate entity) indicating that
>> they
>> >>> are
>> >>> >> > licensing the ASF to use the code under the Apache license
>> >>> (irrespective
>> >>> >> of
>> >>> >> > the original license).  I'm assuming that at Intel some # of
>> engineers
>> >>> >> > contributed to this code, and that it was under a proprietary
>> license
>> >>> >> until
>> >>> >> > this JIRA ticket was filed.  In that case, SGA is almost always
>> the
>> >>> right
>> >>> >> > document to get signed.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > In the situations where we see ICLAs, there isn't usually a SGA
>> >>> involved
>> >>> >> > since its covered under an ICLA for that committer and needs to be
>> >>> >> applied
>> >>> >> > as a patch/pull request.  The other clear thing this indicates is
>> a
>> >>> loss
>> >>> >> of
>> >>> >> > provenance, since (I haven't looked at all of the source files)
>> we're
>> >>> >> > receiving a flat dump of code to be brought into an existing
>> >>> repository.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > So, unfortunately, until that's resolved I'm -1 to accepting it.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > [1]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:03 AM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> Hi John,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> as far as I understand the situation, the contribution has been
>> >>> >> >> submitted by Jessica Marz on behalf of Intel. The copyright is
>> >>> >> >> entirely Intel and the CCLA received is _from_ Intel, covering
>> >>> Jessica
>> >>> >> >> Marz and the contribution. Does that help?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> regards,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Karl
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:54 AM, John D. Ament <
>> >>> johndam...@apache.org>
>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> > Hello,
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > Can you please clarify whether only a CCLA was received, or if
>> >>> >> ICLAs/SGA
>> >>> >> >> > were received as well?  The document indicates a CCLA was
>> received
>> >>> >> from
>> >>> >> >> an
>> >>> >> >> > individual, which doesn't sound right.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > John
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:32 AM Karl Pauls <
>> karlpa...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> the Apache Felix project has received the contribution of the
>> >>> Bundle
>> >>> >> >> >> Archive File Installer Extension.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> - The code is attached to FELIX-5732 [0].
>> >>> >> >> >> - The IP Clearance form has been committed [1].
>> >>> >> >> >> - The acceptance vote has passed on the dev@felix malining
>> list
>> >>> [2].
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> The clearance passes by lazy consensus if no -1 votes are cast
>> >>> within
>> >>> >> >> >> the next 72 hours.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> regards,
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> Karl
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5732
>> >>> >> >> >> [1]
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-bar-file-install-extension.html
>> >>> >> >> >> [2]
>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg44409.html
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> Karl Pauls
>> >>> >> >> >> karlpa...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> Karl Pauls
>> >>> >> >> karlpa...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> Karl Pauls
>> >>> >> karlpa...@gmail.com
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Karl Pauls
>> >>> karlpa...@gmail.com
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Karl Pauls
>> > karlpa...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karl Pauls
>> karlpa...@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to