RE: Some missing things for the December report

>-Original Message- >From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] > >hcatalog: no report! [Dropped other podling dev lists] HCatalog still has no report for December and no discussion about it on the DEV list. The last Shepherd also recommended in September that the podling loo

RE: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012

>-Original Message- >From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@apache.org] >Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 1:41 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012 > >On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:20:35PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> I miss Ona

RE: checking on the shepherd inventory (or, 3.14159 IPMC members ...)

>From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] >I liked that Jukka assigned me to random podlings as this exposes me to new >ideas. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands

RE: [VOTE] Graduate OpenMeetings from Incubator

+1 >-Original Message- >From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 1:51 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Graduate OpenMeetings from Incubator > >Dear Incubation members, > >Duri

RE: [VOTE] Retire Chukwa from incubation

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com] >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 6:00 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Retire Chukwa from incubation > >Hi, > >The Chukwa community has voted to retire the project. > >Following the retirement gui

Re: Sub-projects - when are they acceptable? (was Re: [VOTE] Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany)

On 11/21/12 7:26 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Ross Gardler > wrote: >> On 21 November 2012 10:36, Bertrand Delacretaz >>wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >>> wrote: >>> > ...sub-"products", or the ability for a PMC to relea

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany

+1 (binding) On 11/20/12 12:41 AM, "Luciano Resende" wrote: >Apache Nuvem will define an open application programming interface >for common cloud application services, allowing applications to be >easily ported across the most popular cloud platforms. It is >currently composed of multiple cloud

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

:+1 Sander van der Waal: +1 Scott Wilson: +1 Andrew Hart: +1 James Snell: +1 Ryan Baxter: +1 * Mohammad Nour El-Din: +1 * Ate Douma: +1 * Ralph Goers: +1 Raminder Singh:+1 * Matt Franklin: +1 * Jakob Homan: +1 On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, "Franklin, Matt

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (binding) On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: >Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in >good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the >Incubator. > >The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

Re: November reports

On 11/14/12 6:14 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: >Hi, > >We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since >you're only just starting, a very simple report like the one from >Ripple is quite enough for now. Syncope, you already passed the >graduation vote, so there isn't that much to

[VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also copied as text below. Please vote. [ ] +1 Accept Streams into the incu

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

committer to the proposal on the wiki. > >cheers, > >[1] http://www.slideshare.net/dpalmisano/semtech2012-finalpdf >[2] http://xmlns.notu.be/aair/ > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. > wrote: >> I would like to propose a new Activity Streams ser

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

e Mitre prototype >> implemented in? >> >> Cheers, >> - Andrew >> >> On 11/06/2012 09:06 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> >>> I would like to propose a new Activity Streams server project to the >>> Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

Apologies for the delay, the conference wifi was taken down before I could send the e-mail. Unfortunately, when I ran a license header check, the report came back with some minified css & js files in the source release. As far as I am aware, minified files are not considered source and therefore

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

On 11/5/12 6:38 AM, "Joachim Dreimann" wrote: >+1 (non-binding) > >Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members >if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all? >The minimum required 72 hours have also passed. Unfortunately, a release requires at least 3 IPMC members

RE: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

Hi Jason, It is a little early for the vote. We want to make sure everyone has sufficient time to comment. The vote will be held shortly. Matt Sent from a mobile device -Original Message- From: Jason Letourneau [jletournea...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

+1 (binding) On 11/6/12 10:57 AM, "Adam Berry" wrote: >Hello, > >This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now >submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator. > >Cheers, >Adam Berry > >= HDT (Hadoop Development Tools) = > >== Abstract == >Tools

[PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

I would like to propose a new Activity Streams server project to the Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki at the following location: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal Streams is a collaborative effort from multiple organizations and individuals working with and around the Activ

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Wookie podling from the incubator

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Scott Wilson [mailto:scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:33 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Wookie podling from the incubator > >This is a call for vote to graduate the Wookie podling from Apache

RE: [VOTE] Ripple Emulator to be admitted to the incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Gord Tanner [mailto:gtan...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:04 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Ripple Emulator to be admitted to the incubator > >Please cast your votes! > >[ ] +1, recommend Ripple to move into t

RE: Preparing for the October reports

>-Original Message- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:18 PM >To: general >Subject: RE: Preparing for the October reports > >>-Original Message- >>From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt..

Tashi: A Shepherd's View

I am concerned about the lack of mail list and JIRA activity for the podling since the last reporting period. There has been very little activity, but the report indicates a lot of work was completed. I did see a bunch of commits in August, but the only e-mails on the list were from the commit

RE: Preparing for the October reports

>-Original Message- >From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:28 PM >To: general >Subject: Re: Preparing for the October reports > >Hi, > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Jukka Zitting >wrote: >> It would be nice if we had all reviews read

RE: key signing

>-Original Message- >From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com] >Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 8:54 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: key signing > >On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> It's good to recommend people to get their keys signed b

RE: September Reports

>-Original Message- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:58 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: September Reports > >>-Original Message- >>From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt.

NPanday: A Shepherd's View

I am concerned about the level of engagement of the community. The vast majority of mail traffic has been from automated build failures and even a question from a potential user saw no response from the committers/PPMC. IMHO, there needs to be a significant increase in engagement over time bef

Wave: A Shepherd's View

Is there anything that could be released, even in alpha/beta form? Code completeness or maturity is not a barrier to graduation so long as the community can demonstrate an understanding of the Apache release process. IMO, it is best to get early, alpha releases out on a regular basis. You don

Isis: A Shepherd's View

Good report. Two questions/comments: - Why not just propose the committers and see what the PPMC thinks before holding an official vote? Is there a reason for waiting? - The incubator status page needs to be completed. It appears that more has happened than the page reflects.

RE: September Reports

>-Original Message- >From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:54 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: September Reports > >Hi, > >On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: >> I have some time tonight is t

RE: Usage of JRebel in Apache projects

>-Original Message- >From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:06 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Usage of JRebel in Apache projects > >Hi, > >JRebel already offers a 1 year for

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Airavata from the incubator

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Suresh Marru [mailto:sma...@apache.org] >Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 6:59 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Airavata from the incubator > >Hi All, > >Since entering Incubation in May 2011, the Airavata community has evolved >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings Moodle Plugin 1.4 Incubating Release Candidate 1

+1 (binding) for the release. On 8/10/12 7:47 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: >If no one else beats me to it, I will review this before the end of the >weekend. s/the weekend/Monday (apologies) > >-Matt > >>-Original Message- >>From: s

RE: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings Moodle Plugin 1.4 Incubating Release Candidate 1

If no one else beats me to it, I will review this before the end of the weekend. -Matt >-Original Message- >From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:28 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org >Subje

RE: Preparing for August report

I reviewed droids and thought their report adequately represented the project state. -Original Message- From: Jukka Zitting [jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 06:37 PM Eastern Standard Time To: general Subject: Re: Preparing for

RE: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:41 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator > >I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the >Ap

Amber - A Shepherd's View

Community looks well on the way to graduation. Congratulations on the recent release. There are a few things on the status page that need to be filled in and processes [1] like suitable name search need to be completed prior to graduation vote at the IPMC level. [1]:http://incubator.apache.org/g

RE: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

>-Original Message- >From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com] >Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:25 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: Grant Ingersoll; Isabel Drost >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator > >On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning >wr

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Amber 0.22-incubating

+1. Good job Amber team. The sigs check out, headers look good with the exception of the .json files (as expected), LICENSE & NOTICE look like due diligence was performed. One note to Simone You need to get your key signed :) -Matt >-Original Message- >From: simone.trip...@gmail.co

RE: Fwd: [ANN] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC3-incubating released

>-Original Message- >From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On >Behalf Of Simone Tripodi >Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 6:23 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org; elecha...@apache.org >Subject: Re: Fwd: [ANN] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC3-incubating released > >Aplogize f

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Amber 0.22-incubating

>-Original Message- >From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:55 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Amber 0.22-incubating > >Anyone else from the IPMC willing to review this ? I will try to review this

Kafka: A Shepherd's view

Report and community look great. I look forward to a future graduation VOTE :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

VXQuery: A Mentor's View

I wanted to echo the recent thread regarding the need for additional mentorship for VXQuery. Cezar only needs to request IPMC membership to become a mentor; but event hen he would be the only mentor that I can find recent activity for. In addition to the need for mentors, there a couple of th

RE: Celix: A Shepherd's View

Adding correct list for Celix. >-Original Message- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] >Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 9:57 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: 'celix-...@apache.org' >Subject: Celix: A Shepherd's View > >S

Celix: A Shepherd's View

Sorry for the late shepherd notes, but I have reviewed the Celix community and it looks like the Celix community is continuing to progress, albeit slowly. A couple of notes: 1) I would recommend trying to accelerate release plans. It takes a lot of work up front, but cutting releases is a criti

RE: Board will be proposing a new TLP

+1 for straight to TLP given the individuals and code provenance. >-Original Message- >From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] >Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:24 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Board will be proposing a new TLP > >For those not following board@, the b

RE: [VOTE] Retire Kato

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:30 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Retire Kato > >Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board >report, I propose that the IPMC retire th

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Allura to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) On 6/21/12 12:34 PM, "Rich Bowen" wrote: >Hi, > >We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would >like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours >has passed since the initial proposal. > >The proposal may be found at >http://wiki.

OpenMeetings - A Shepard's View

The report does not list the top issues for graduation. Also, it appears that there were some practices that are not quite inline with recommendations; though, the mentors have appeared to address this. Other than that, activity and community appear to be strong. -

Flex - A Shepherd's View

Great report. The only comment I have after reviewing the community is that the incubator status page needs to be updated as it is completely empty. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For addition

Bigtop - A Shepherd's View

I think the Bigtop report is in good shape. From my viewpoint, Bigtop is getting close to graduating; but, I would defer to the mentors who know the project best. It would be nice to see some activity from more of the committers though... --

RE: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu] >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 11:36 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator > >Hi, >We are proposing cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project a

RE: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

>-Original Message- >From: Arvind Prabhakar [mailto:arv...@apache.org] >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:22 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks) > >On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012

RE: JIRA and communities

>-Original Message- >From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] >Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:51 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: JIRA and communities > >So, what message here should the incubator send a podling, or the >foundation send a TLP? I really don't

RE: [VOTE] Accept Crunch into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Josh Wills [mailto:jwi...@cloudera.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:46 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Accept Crunch into the Apache Incubator > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for >incubation in

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Wookie 0.10.0-incubating (General Incubation List)

>-Original Message- >From: Scott Wilson [mailto:scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:13 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Wookie 0.10.0-incubating (General >Incubation List) > >This is the third incubator release for Apache Rave,

RE: Flex Status

>-Original Message- >From: Greg Reddin [mailto:gred...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:29 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flex Status > >On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dave Fisher >wrote: >> Some day I'll write about the differences between AOO and Flex as

RE: Flex Status

>-Original Message- >From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:44 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flex Status > > >On May 10, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dave Fisher >wrote

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

>-Original Message- >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:42 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports > >On 10 May 2012 13:39, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>-Origi

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

>-Original Message- >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:32 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports > >Thanks Jukka, > >One of the issues to address for next time is where to record >shepherds commen

RE: Ambari Status

>-Original Message- >From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:47 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Ambari Status > >On 10 May 2012 06:05, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthe

Flex Status

I have reviewed the flex report and community and didn't find any major issues. The small things I found are: 1) The report appears to be written by a single person 2) This person appears to be disheartened a bit ("We expect the initial RC's to be rejected as we finalize licensing and other p

Ambari Status

In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns: * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after January. *As Ambari went nearly 2 months without a single e-mail

RE: Mentor cleanup

>I do think it is fair to ask mentors to sign into the wiki and put >their name against 1-2 reports for projects they are monitoring. +1 >Having said that "just ask" is exactly what Jukka has done here. Lets >work together to make it easier for him and his eventual successor. If mentors are acti

RE: [VOTE] retire zeta components from incubation

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Julien Vermillard [mailto:jvermill...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:13 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] retire zeta components from incubation > >Hi, > >As discussed earlier the Zeta components community has voted >to retire

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

>-Original Message- >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:09 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports > >On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>-Origi

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

>-Original Message- >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:24 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports > >On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross G

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

>-Original Message- >From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:54 AM >To: general >Subject: Shepherds for podling reports > >Hi, > >In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and >giving constructive feedback where needed, I'

RE: Spam on the Incubator wiki

>-Original Message- >From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 8:20 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Spam on the Incubator wiki > >Hi, > >On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. > wro

RE: Spam on the Incubator wiki

Can you please grant my account (MattFranklin) edit karma for the wiki? Thanks. >-Original Message- >From: Gavin McDonald [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au] >Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:21 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: Spam on the Incubator wiki > > > >> -Origin

RE: including external code under apache 2.0

>-Original Message- >From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] >On Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko >Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:16 PM >To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org >Cc: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: including external code under apache 2.0

RE: Adding Syncope IPMC member in the incubator group

ipodi.livejournal.com/ >http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >http://www.99soft.org/ > > > >On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. > wrote: >>>-Original Message- >>>From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On >

RE: Adding Syncope IPMC member in the incubator group

>-Original Message- >From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On >Behalf Of Simone Tripodi >Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:31 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Adding Syncope IPMC member in the incubator group > >Good morning all! :) > >new guys of Ap

RE: Problem with Olio Java Setup

Hi Kim, Glad to see you are reaching out for help, but this list isn't the right place for this question. Please direct this question to the Olio user list (olio-u...@incubator.apache.org). general@ is used for cross-project incubator discussions. The vast majority of us on general don't h

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

On 4/12/12 3:35 PM, "Karl Wright" wrote: >I should also mention that Jukka voted +1 during the community voting >on this RC, so his vote should be binding here as well. For future reference, it is a best practice to include a link to the PPMC VOTE thread [1]. It has also been suggested that the

RE: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com] >Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:32 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator > >Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. >The

Re: ERR 0194 ...StreamResult of target/current.ent building incubator.a.o site

On 4/9/12 9:38 PM, "David Crossley" wrote: >Shane Curcuru wrote: >> Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated. > >There is some doc at [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html >but since moving to use the Apache Content Management System (CMS) >that page might need some

RE: Question about downloading binaries

>-Original Message- >From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:24 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Question about downloading binaries > >"Also, making sure the other comments on NOTICEs are addressed as well." > >I have gotten extremel

RE: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

+1. Congrats >-Original Message- >From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne.apa...@gmail.com] On Behalf >Of Andy Seaborne >Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:11 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project > >This is a call for vote

RE: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project

+1 (binding) >-Original Message- >From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org] >Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:42 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: rat-...@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project > >As recommended[1]: > > * the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.9-incubating

member vote cast on the rave-dev list On 3/10/12 7:49 PM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: >This is the eighth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts >being versioned as 0.9-incubating. > >We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3

[VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.9-incubating

This is the eighth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.9-incubating. We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev - VOTE: http://markmail.org/message/3ipmolpl66j3dc34 RES

RE: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org] >Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 11:03 AM >To: rat-...@incubator.apache.org >Cc: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project > >The graduation guide[

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6

to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6

sitive licenses we are going to release until the >> overnext year. >> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >> >> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>trunk to >> 0.4.0, compression and stuff

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6

-1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" wrote: >Hi, > >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. > >Signing KEYS: >http://svn.apache.org/repos/a

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

. IPMC member voting record: * Ate Douma: +1 * Ross Gardler: +1 Karl Wright: +1 *Denotes an IPMC member vote cast on the rave-dev list >-Original Message- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] >Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:30 PM >To: general@incubato

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

gt; >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Karl >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Karl >Wright  wrote: >>>> >>>> I'll have a look at it.  Stay tuned... >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

> >On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >> I'll have a look at it.  Stay tuned... >> Karl >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. >> wrote: >>> We still need one more IPMC member vote for the release.  Does any

[VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

We still need one more IPMC member vote for the release. Does anyone have time to take a look? Thanks in advance, -Matt On 2/12/12 9:29 PM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: >This is the seventh incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts >being versioned as 0.8-incub

[VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

This is the seventh incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.8-incubating. We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev - VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G RESULT: http:/

RE: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov] >Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:16 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for >Incubator PMC Chair) > >Hi Folks, > >OK there

Re: TL;DR

On 2/4/12 1:11 AM, "Scott Wilson" wrote: >On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep >> breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues >> that have led to a bumper crop of email. These are complex

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

On 2/4/12 12:28 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote: >On 2/3/2012 9:01 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> >> Personally, I feel that walking in the door as a full PMC with authority >> could be just as problematic in the long run as not granting it once the >>

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

On 2/3/12 9:28 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote: >On Feb 3, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> >> On Feb 3, 2012, at 6:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 2/3/2012 7:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > My interest goes beyond any of those topics, though. Incubator is >

RE: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

r. >wrote: >> On 2/3/2012 12:51 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> >>> So that everyone affected by these proposals has the opportunity to >engage in the discussion, I recommend that we pull these out of e-mail for a >while and ask everyone who has a new "plan&

RE: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

>-Original Message- >From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:27 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?) > >Hi, > >[Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to trac

RE: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

>-Original Message- >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:21 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair > >On 30 January 2012 13:00, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >

RE: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

>-Original Message- >From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] >Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 7:30 AM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair > >On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ate Douma wrote: >> ...I just realize somethin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.7-incubating

dev list the vote succeeds. IPMC member voting record: * Ate Douma: +1 * Hadrian Zbarcea : +1 * Ross Gardler: +1 Community voting record: Andreas Kuckartz: +1 *Denotes an IPMC member vote cast on the rave-dev list >-Original Message- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. >Sent: Monday

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.7-incubating

ote: >> On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, "sebb" wrote: >>> >>>> On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B. >>>> wrote: >>>>> This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave,

  1   2   >