On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote:
>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues >related with packaging web resources e.g., >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 > >If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. ><mfrank...@mitre.org> wrote: >> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release >>is >> preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that >> you should look at. >> >> [1]: >> >>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t >>yp >> es >> >> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>party >>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>of >>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>which I >>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>> >>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >>> >>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>> >>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>>again? >> >> >> Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary >> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need >>to >> include its license. >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE >> >> >> >>> >>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >>> >>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>trunk to >>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>> >>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>>tested enough yet. >>> >>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >>><thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>>license. If >>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until >>>>the >>>> overnext year. >>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>>> >>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>trunk to >>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>> >>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfrank...@mitre.org> >>>> >>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns >>>>>noted >>>>> below. >>>>> >>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This >>>>>fixes >>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>>> > >>>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource >>>>>s/ >>>>>fi >>>>> >les/KEYS >>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>>> >>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own >>>>>public >>>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>>> >>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx >>>>>>t >>>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t >>>>>>xt >>>>> >>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>party >>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>of >>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>which I >>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>>> >>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>>> > >>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>>> >headers. >>>>> > >>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>>> > >>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>>> > >>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>>> > >>>>> >Thanks. >>>>> >-- >>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>> >@eddieyoon >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thomas Jungblut >>>> Berlin <thomas.jungb...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>@eddieyoon >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > >-- >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >@eddieyoon > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
