On 11/5/12 6:38 AM, "Joachim Dreimann" <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>+1 (non-binding) > >Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members >if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all? >The minimum required 72 hours have also passed. Unfortunately, a release requires at least 3 IPMC members to vote +1. I am looking at it now and will cast a vote when I have properly reviewed the release. > >We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is >already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released. > >Thanks, >Joe > > >On 31 October 2012 21:49, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann >> <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> > The result of the vote is summarised here: >> > http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs >> >> This message didn't include an IPMC tally, but I see that Mentor Branko >> Čibej >> voted on the bloodhound-dev thread. That makes one IPMC member voting >>+1; >> two >> more are needed. >> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Less than a day left... any takers? >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> > > > >-- >Joe Dreimann >UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> >* >* >*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN >HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
