+1 for straight to TLP given the individuals and code provenance.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:24 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Board will be proposing a new TLP
>
>For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
>of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
>the project behind our STV and voting tools.
>
>The impetus behind this was when I suggested to the OpenStack
>people to use STV for their voting system, which kind of re-kicked
>the idea in my head that our voting tools were too good to not
>provide as releasable code to the world at large.
>
>Since all code was developed w/i the ASF, by ASF people, and
>is under the ALv2 (either implied/confirmed by the authors or
>explicit in the code itself), there is some debate on whether
>or not Incubation is even required... The board would like to
>recommend to the Incubator that the board simply proceed with
>the creation of this project at the next board meeting.
>
>Thx.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to