On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 11:25 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > Is there an existing script that does such a diff? (In SVN or on
> > someone favourite test machine :).
>
> Gotta love previously solved problems...
>
> contrib/compare_tests
Thanks, I
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 11:40 -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:09 -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > > Agreed; if there is no change there is no information content, and
> > > the list could be overwhelmed with messages that
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:09 -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > Agreed; if there is no change there is no information content, and
> > the list could be overwhelmed with messages that are near-duplicates.
> > I suppose you could do comparison
On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
Is there an existing script that does such a diff? (In SVN or on
someone favourite test machine :).
Gotta love previously solved problems...
contrib/compare_tests
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:10 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > Is sending each rev testresults to gcc-testresults ok?
> >
> > Yes, I think that is useful.
>
> Well, a nice optimization for people using the list archives would
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:09 -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> Agreed; if there is no change there is no information content, and
> the list could be overwhelmed with messages that are near-duplicates.
> I suppose you could do comparisons of the .sum files to determine if
> there has been a change.
There's
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:10:57AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > Is sending each rev testresults to gcc-testresults ok?
> >
> > Yes, I think that is useful.
>
> Well, a nice optimization for people using the list archives
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Is sending each rev testresults to gcc-testresults ok?
>
> Yes, I think that is useful.
Well, a nice optimization for people using the list archives would be
to only send test logs that have changed since the last one posted.
O
On 1/23/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've put in place a script that monitor svn log on trunk and launches
> a bootstrap + check on each commit (distributed on the 7 CFARM ubuntu
> machines). On average since Nov2005 there have been 20 commits per day
> on trunk so, a cyc
Hi,
I've put in place a script that monitor svn log on trunk and launches
a bootstrap + check on each commit (distributed on the 7 CFARM ubuntu
machines). On average since Nov2005 there have been 20 commits per day
on trunk so, a cycle taking about 8 hours I expect to use about 50%
of CFARM ressou
10 matches
Mail list logo
