On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:09 -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > Agreed; if there is no change there is no information content, and > the list could be overwhelmed with messages that are near-duplicates. > I suppose you could do comparisons of the .sum files to determine if > there has been a change.
There's the information that the CFARM build succeeded and that there is no regression on the new revision. Not sending an email would mean you cannot distinguish between a failed build, a not working CFARM and everything is fine (by looking only at gcc-testresults). Assuming we send an email, it could be of course much shorter if it's "unchanged". For technical reasons (non uniform processor speed, load), rev N+1 can be available before rev N, but we can do with latest available when build finishes. I wrote: > I have a serie of build which failed (gcov build ICE), r110009 to > r110025, what to do with those, email to testresults with end of build > log? I assume no one object to those "FAILED" messages? Laurent
