On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:10:57AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > Is sending each rev testresults to gcc-testresults ok? > > > > Yes, I think that is useful. > > Well, a nice optimization for people using the list archives would be > to only send test logs that have changed since the last one posted. > Optionally, by some change other than the total number of PASS.
Agreed; if there is no change there is no information content, and the list could be overwhelmed with messages that are near-duplicates. I suppose you could do comparisons of the .sum files to determine if there has been a change.
