f Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:57 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Nick, where did the concept come from that persons other than the participants
will read th
"I assume our privacy follows from our lack of importance. To others."
This is the sense that I have always understood the statement:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights,..."
That we,
oncerns. Also, being an up-tight easterner, I am
> probably more self-canceling than many of you. Finally, my die is already
> cast. But *should I* be listening to what I write with an Other Ear?
> For your sakes, at least?
>
>
>
> I suggest we start another thread: “What Cannot
day, October 27, 2021 12:57 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Nick, where did the concept come from that persons other than the participants
will read these conversations? If you're referring to your hope that
Invoking Jesus.. Jesus, what desperation to protect this claim!
From: Friam On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:15 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki
om that my professional obscurity conveys that I never worry
>> about such reputational concerns. Also, being an up-tight easterner, I am
>> probably more self-canceling than many of you. Finally, my die is already
>> cast. But *should I* be listening to what I write with an O
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
>
>
>
> Nick, where did the concept come from that persons other than the
> participants will read these conversations? If you're re
Hah, what was that you said about everyone being narcissistic? (I’m not so
sure it is so.)
From: Friam On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 11:57 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Nick
gt; cast. But *should I* be listening to what I write with an Other Ear?
>> For your sakes, at least?
>>
>>
>>
>> I suggest we start another thread: “What Cannot Be Said On Friam” and
>> explore this matter carefully.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
&g
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
It's a form of scorn and derision to say, for example, "You lose; I win". Very
obnoxious.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670
Cannot Be Said On Friam” and
> explore this matter carefully.
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nick Thompson
>
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Frank Wimberly
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October
<https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 10:50 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
It'
It's a form of scorn and derision to say, for example, "You lose; I win".
Very obnoxious.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021, 8:02 AM uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
> That's unhelpful. 8^D What does it mean?
>
> On 10/27/21 6:53 AM, Fr
Excellent! Thanks.
My complete ignorance forced me to duckduckgo it. The results were mostly
useless. But Urban Dict seems to work:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Neener-neener
One of the definitions also raises the brinkmanship aspect Nick seemed to
include (with "I'm more po
On 10/27/21 7:53 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Most people would spell that, "nanner, nanner, nanner", I think. It's
heard on playgrounds all over, or it was in the 40s and 50s. In
Mexico they sing, "lero, lero, lero", using the same notes.
It would seem there are many regional and quasi-genera
On 10/27/21 7:34 AM, uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
I have no idea how to respond to this post. I don't know what "neener, neener,
neener" means, unfortunately.
For some reason, I feel like King Arthur at the base of the French castle in
The Holy Grail: https://youtu.be/QSo0duY7-9s
I do believe that one
That's unhelpful. 8^D What does it mean?
On 10/27/21 6:53 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Most people would spell that, "nanner, nanner, nanner", I think. It's heard
> on playgrounds all over, or it was in the 40s and 50s. In Mexico they sing,
> "lero, lero, lero", using the same notes.
>
>
> O
Most people would spell that, "nanner, nanner, nanner", I think. It's
heard on playgrounds all over, or it was in the 40s and 50s. In Mexico
they sing, "lero, lero, lero", using the same notes.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Wed, Oct
I have no idea how to respond to this post. I don't know what "neener, neener,
neener" means, unfortunately. But the grand narrative I'm talking about is the
(I suppose Rawlsian?) social contract, including the wall of ignorance. That's
distinct, I think, from the altruism of joining a collectiv
Thompson
thompnicks...@gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 1:55 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Well, I'm not fluent enough to kno
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12:08 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
>
> Ugh. Sorry for this: Holton, not Houlton:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood
fish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Ugh. Sorry for this: Holton, not Houlton:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Holton
And the semantic slippery slope from moral equivalent to inalienable rights is
just nonsense, trickery that should never be forgiven. Now, where I di
Ugh. Sorry for this: Holton, not Houlton:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Holton
And the semantic slippery slope from moral equivalent to inalienable rights is
just nonsense, trickery that should never be forgiven. Now, where I disagree
with Dave is that it might be possible to establish so
mpson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:02 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
from Glen's post:
Holton: [...] Can you and I, as an intellectual exercise, think o
at he was kin.
nick
Nick Thompson
thompnicks...@gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 8:46 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
Very cool! I&
ress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 8:32 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Revising the American Revolution
I simply don't get this part of your post. If I replace "textualism" and
&q
from Glen's post:
*Holton: [...] Can you and I, as an intellectual exercise, think of anything
wrong with, all people are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain
inalienable rights? That’s not the whole story, but I can’t find anything wrong
with that. Can you?*
"endowed by their
Very cool! I've added Fragments to my wishlist. I'm wondering how/if it relates
to black radicalism, of which I'm still completely ignorant.
Egalitarianism was briefly covered in the podcast:
Holton: [...] Can you and I, as an intellectual exercise, think of anything
wrong with, all people are
I simply don't get this part of your post. If I replace "textualism" and
"textualist" with "originalism" and "originalist", then it makes some sense.
But the textualists are trying to keep the document *current*, right? It's the
originalists who want the document to mean the same thing it meant
Wil Wheaton - best known for playing Wesley Crusher on Star Trek, and
related appearances on Big Bang Theory - turns out to be a really cool guy,
who went through some traumatic stuff during his childhood celebrity days.
He gave a relevant answer to a fan question on this topic:
Q: I have more of
Good way to get a heart attack.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021, 4:17 PM Merle Lefkoff wrote:
> Nick, the problem here is context. Time moves on and change happens, both
> positive and negative. Now we have post-col
Nick, the problem here is context. Time moves on and change happens, both
positive and negative. Now we have post-colonialism, BLM, and #metoo.
What I think is interesting is that these internet-driven movements create
a more distributed "Hero" cohort, whose charisma doesn't lead to worship,
but
"What do we do when we discover that people who have achieved great things have
also done great harms"Good question. The Greek philosopher Aristotle ("We are
what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit”) was a
teacher of Alexander the Great, who longed for world dominatio
This seems like an appropriate point to recommend a small book:
*Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology*
David Graeber (asst. Prof, anthroplogy, Yale)
Prickly Paradigm Press [love the publisher name]
Chicago
www.press.uchicago.edu
www.prickly-paradigm.com
I believe that, within the book, some s
34 matches
Mail list logo
