Hi Bente,
so you did process subjectname_pre_nii and subjectname_post_dicom
independently with freesurfer (recon-all)? You should have those
directories in you subjects dir.
I have never seen the error you are getting. Can you send me the full
recon-all.log to see at what step it is failing?
In
To check it with tkregister2, you can:
tkregister2 --mov $FREESURFER_HOME/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca \
--targ ../brainmask.mgz --lta-inv talairach.lta --reg
talairach.lta.reg.dat \
--surfs --s $subject
I don't have anyway to actually save the result at this time.
doug
Jeff Sadino wrote
Hi Antonella,
1) Can you please help me find or get the the cvs_avg35/mri/norm.mgz? I saw
online the same question was posted on June 2011 but there is no answer for the
question online:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/15506607.html
Have you run the cvs
Hi Jeff,
yes, you should be able to use the 5.1 talairach.lta with 5.0. Make sure
you rerun everything forward from the talairach.lta step
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Nov
2011, Jeff Sadino wrote:
Hello,
I have several subjects with bad surfaces in fs 5.0.0. After checking their
talairach.lta
Hi Don, I found the problem (which is that it skips loading the target
surface when the source and target subjects are the same; it now
verifies that the ico order is also the same and loads the target
surface if not). You can get the new version from here:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/trans
Hello,
I have several subjects with bad surfaces in fs 5.0.0. After checking
their talairach.lta file, these transforms are all bad. I tried using
tkregister2 to create a good talairach.lta file, but it just wasn't
working. I tried rerunning these subjects in fs 5.1.0, and their
talairach.lta f
Hi Cynthia
motion in 3D anatomical scans doesn't work the same way as in 2D functional
scans since the data is being acquired in spatial frequency ("k-space"),
not in space. There are sequences around that compensate for motion,
including one recently developed at MGH by M Dylan Tisdall and And
Hello, I am wondering whether there is any way to compensate for motion in
anatomical images (for the purposes of salvaging data for cortical thickness
analysis)? If not, is there a general rule of thumb or some way to tell how
much motion is too much for this type of analysis? Or is it more of
My suggested work-around in my earlier email does not actually work. It outputs
as ico7 even though my "average" subject is ico3.
From: dhagle...@hotmail.com
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:52:22 -0800
Subject: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf ico to ico
I am tryi
Dear FS-experts,
I'm doing a longitudinal comparison of cortical thickness and am therefore
following the steps of the longitudinal stream on the freesurfer wiki.
I've created templates for all of my subjects but one, for which I received an
error message trying to create the template (or base)
I am trying to use mri_surf2surf to resample surface data in mgh format
from ico4 to ico3. There is an apparent bug, however, in that the output
file has the same dimensions as the input file despite srcicoorder = 4
and trgicoorder = 3. I am using ico for both srcsubject and trgsubject.
This
thanks Don,
I put your fix in
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Don Hagler wrote:
FYI, in version 5.1.0, FreeSurferColorLUT.txt has a space (" ") instead of an
empty line at line 1189. This causes the
matlab funciton read_fscolorlut to throw an error.
An easy fix is to change this line:
if(~isem
FYI, in version 5.1.0, FreeSurferColorLUT.txt has a space (" ") instead of an
empty line at line 1189. This causes the matlab funciton read_fscolorlut to
throw an error.
An easy fix is to change this line:
if(~isempty(tline) & tline(1) ~= '#') break; end
to this:
if(~isempty(deblank(t
Hi All,
There is a large variability between labs. An extensive effort has begun
for produce a "Harmonized Protocol for Hippocampal Volumetry", see:
http://www.hippocampal-protocol.net/SOPs/index.html
This group has been working on this goal for a few years. Good resources
at their site, par
Hi Joshua
I'll cc Jean Augustinack and Stephan Heckers, who I know have opinions on
this issue :)
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
There is great variability between the different segmentation protocols used
by different research groups, and I think people are eager for
There is great variability between the different segmentation protocols
used by different research groups, and I think people are eager for a
standard to facilitate comparison and replication. By becoming part of
Freesurfer, I suspect that your segmentation algorithm will become that
standard.
Luc
Hi Joshua,
I'm not a neuroanatomist so I can't really answer that question. My
aim has just been to replicate what a human expert has given us as
segmentation examples on a number of different subjects.
I know that different labs follow very different conventions for
labeling the subfields manual
At least by my reading of the Duvernoy Human Hippocampus atlas, the most
anterior and posterior extents of the hippocmapus (perhaps just a slice at
the tips in most scans) are almost entirely composed of the CA1 subfield.
Thoughts?
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
D
Thanks Koen.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Koen Van Leemput
wrote:
> The answer is close to what Shashwath suggested, except that the
> "Hippocampus" segmentation is really computed at the same time as all
> the other subfields. For unfortunate reasons, the tail of the
> hippocampus that is no
The answer is close to what Shashwath suggested, except that the
"Hippocampus" segmentation is really computed at the same time as all
the other subfields. For unfortunate reasons, the tail of the
hippocampus that is not further subdivided in our manual training
segmentations was called "Hippocampu
Hi Allan and Joshua,
The hippocampal subfield segmentation really just uses a few output
files generated by the usual FreeSurfer volumetric stream, so the
short answer is that it should be perfectly possible to use 5.1 to do
hippocampal subfield segmentation on FreeSurfer results processed with
5.
21 matches
Mail list logo