Re: [Freesurfer] mri_cvs_register update

2011-06-10 Thread Peter J. Molfese
Is this significant enough that we should re-run data processed using the standard recon-all stream in version 5.1? Thanks, Peter On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:28 PM, freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:59:34 -0400 (EDT) > From: Lilla Zollei > Subject

Re: [Freesurfer] Whole brain parcellation.

2011-06-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
What do you mean you are doing it with FEAT? Sudhin A. Shah wrote: > Hello, > > I am a beginner so please bear with me. I want to obtain binary masks > for every region (Cortical + subcortical). I am using FSL(feat) to do > this BUT am not sure what the labels would be. > > I have looked at Free

[Freesurfer] Whole brain parcellation.

2011-06-10 Thread Sudhin A. Shah
Hello, I am a beginner so please bear with me. I want to obtain binary masks for every region (Cortical + subcortical). I am using FSL(feat) to do this BUT am not sure what the labels would be. I have looked at FreeSurferColorLUT.txt for aparc+aseg-in-highres.mgz BUT do not know which labels t

[Freesurfer] aseg labels 96 and 97

2011-06-10 Thread Andrew Ward
Hi FS experts, We have some legacy code (in a BASH script) that uses mri_cor2label to convert what it is calling the anterior amygdala to volumetric labels. However, we get the error that these values (96 and 97) do not exist. Have the label IDs changed? We are using stable5.1. Our call look

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula question: trac-all config file and number of B0 specification

2011-06-10 Thread Deryk S. Beal, Ph.D.
Hi Anastasia If I have T1 data available in my FS subject directory and I have Use brain mask extracted from T1 image instead of low-b diffusion image? # Has no effect if there is no T1 data # Default: 1 (yes) # set usemaskanat = 1 then will the B0 brain mask we spoke of below be used? Deryk

Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all -s exited with ERRORS

2011-06-10 Thread rspriti
Hi Carolina, Sorry My bad. I was inaccurate in my previous message. -subject should work. Assuming that the MPRAGE of your subject is under the following directory: /freesurfer/subjects/buckner_data/tutorial_subj/hptu_subj001_orig set your SUBJECTS_DIR to /freesurfer/subjects/buckner_data/tuto

Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all -s exited with ERRORS

2011-06-10 Thread rspriti
Hi Carolina, -subject is not recognized by Freesurfer...Use -subjid or -s instead. setenv SUBJECTS_DIR recon-all -all -i /MPRAGE.nii.gz -s /hptu_subj001 Priti > Hello Freesurfer's users, > > I'm starting using FS and I have a problem running recon-all > I create a folder called hptu_subj001 w

[Freesurfer] recon-all -s exited with ERRORS

2011-06-10 Thread Carolina Valencia
Hello Freesurfer's users, I'm starting using FS and I have a problem running recon-all I create a folder called hptu_subj001 which contains MPRAGE.nii.gz within tutorial_subj First I convert nii.gz to mgz qith the command: recon-all -i MPRAGE.nii.gz -s hptu_subj001 and then in order to process all

Re: [Freesurfer] MEMPR and longitudinal processing stream

2011-06-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Adam, the dura correction is really in alpha. We've only run it on a couple of datasets and haven't tried to integrate it with anything yet. Feel free to give us an opinion on what works best though :) Bruce On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Martin Reuter wrote: Hi Adam, dura correction is not yet

[Freesurfer] mri_cvs_register update

2011-06-10 Thread Lilla Zollei
Hi, We found a bug in the mri_cvs_register script after the release. Please, download the new version of applyMorph and mri_cvs_register from one of the below links for Linux Centos4, Linux Centos4 x86 64 and Mac Leopard respectively: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/misc/l

Re: [Freesurfer] MEMPR and longitudinal processing stream

2011-06-10 Thread Martin Reuter
Hi Adam, dura correction is not yet incorporated into the longitudinal stream and I doubt that it will just work out of the box, due to the fact that the longitudinals are in a different space than the inputs. Of course it could be done after the cross, but the surfaces there are not important for

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
No, that will be fine. doug corinna bauer wrote: > Will I need to re-register the pet to the mri? > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Douglas N Greve > mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: > > you'll need to get a new version then. You won't need to reanalyze > your anatomicals in

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread corinna bauer
Will I need to re-register the pet to the mri? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote: > you'll need to get a new version then. You won't need to reanalyze your > anatomicals in the new version, but you will need it to run these programs. > > doug > > corinna bauer wrote: > >> I

Re: [Freesurfer] Optimization ITI

2011-06-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
optseq won't be quite what you need because it is going to randomize the order (so you can't always get a feedback after each response). You can tell it that there is only one condition, then go back and recode. You'll probably want to control the min and max fixation, which you can do with opt

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
you'll need to get a new version then. You won't need to reanalyze your anatomicals in the new version, but you will need it to run these programs. doug corinna bauer wrote: > I'm using 4.4.0 > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Douglas N Greve > mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: > > >

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread corinna bauer
I'm using 4.4.0 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote: > > which version are you using? Both should be in both 5.0 and 5.1. > doug > > corinna bauer wrote: > >> Hi Doug, >> >> I used the mri_compute_volume_fractions and fscalc commands and got this >> error message: >> >> mri_c

Re: [Freesurfer] Phillips 3T

2011-06-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Ayaz this is really hard to say. I would recon them with one and with two and visually inspect to see which you think are more accurate. Unfortunately we have no ground truth. Bruce On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Ayaz, Muhammad wrote: > Dear All, > > I have T1 images single scan from Phillips 3T. Im

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Corinna, what version of FS are you using? Bruce On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, corinna bauer wrote: > Hi Doug, > I used the mri_compute_volume_fractions and fscalc commands and got this > error message: > > mri_compute_volume_fractions: Command not found. > fscalc: Command not found. > > Other FreeSur

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula question: trac-all config file and number of B0 specification

2011-06-10 Thread Anastasia Yendiki
Hi Deryk - This variable is only used to average lowb images to create a mask, so in your case you can set it to 2 and it'll just use the first 2 volumes from your nii file. Sorry for the confusion! a.y On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Deryk S. Beal, Ph.D. wrote: Dear Tracula Users Does Tracula assum

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
which version are you using? Both should be in both 5.0 and 5.1. doug corinna bauer wrote: > Hi Doug, > I used the mri_compute_volume_fractions and fscalc commands and got > this error message: > > mri_compute_volume_fractions: Command not found. > fscalc: Command not found. > > Other FreeSurfer

[Freesurfer] Phillips 3T

2011-06-10 Thread Ayaz, Muhammad
Dear All, I have T1 images single scan from Phillips 3T. Images quality looks good. Since we use 8 channel should I be collecting 2 data set to average or single data will be sufficient? Ayaz The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the use of the in

Re: [Freesurfer] pet partial volume correction

2011-06-10 Thread corinna bauer
Hi Doug, I used the mri_compute_volume_fractions and fscalc commands and got this error message: mri_compute_volume_fractions: Command not found. fscalc: Command not found. Other FreeSurfer commands, such as mri_segstats are working fine in the same batch script. Corinna On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at

[Freesurfer] Tracula question: trac-all config file and number of B0 specification

2011-06-10 Thread Deryk S. Beal, Ph.D.
Dear Tracula Users Does Tracula assume that the number of B0 scans, specified in Step 7.3 of the config file tutorial (below), are the first X number of volumes in the 4Dnii.gz file or will the Tracula routines know from the bvals file where the B0 scans are ordered in the file? For example, I hav

[Freesurfer] Tracula question: trac-all config file and number of B0 specification

2011-06-10 Thread Deryk S. Beal, Ph.D.
Dear Tracula Users Does Tracula assume that the number of B0 scans, specified in Step 7.3 of the config file tutorial (below), are the first X number of volumes in the 4Dnii.gz file or will the Tracula routines know from the bvals file where the B0 scans are ordered in the file? For example, I hav

Re: [Freesurfer] MRIs processed with two different FS versions

2011-06-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Yoldanda, which register do you mean? Talairach? You shouldn't mix versions, but you could use the correct Talairach from 5.0 and use it to fix the 4.3.1 run. cheers Bruce On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Yolanda Vives wrote: > Dear Freesurfers, > > I have a dataset processed with a classical recon-a

Re: [Freesurfer] MRIs processed with two different FS versions

2011-06-10 Thread Martin Reuter
Hi Yolanda, No. It is better to remove the two subjects. Mixing versions is never a good idea as results are expected to differ. Same is true for different acquisitions (parameters, scanners etc). If anything has to be different it needs to be asserted that it is spread equally among your group

[Freesurfer] MEMPR and longitudinal processing stream

2011-06-10 Thread Thomas, Adam (NIH/NIMH) [E]
When using MEMPR images (Van der Kouwe et al., 2008) in the longitudinal processing stream, when should the dura correction (mris_makes_surfaces -dura) be ran? After the first cross-sectional run of recon-all, after the final longitudinal run of recon-all, or maybe both? I have the same questi

[Freesurfer] MRIs processed with two different FS versions

2011-06-10 Thread Yolanda Vives
Dear Freesurfers, I have a dataset processed with a classical recon-all of Freesurfer v.4.3.1 and there are two MRIs that were not segmented correctly due to the register. After several unsuccessful attempts to improve this step using tkregister2, finally I have successfully processed them with FS