Hi Yoldanda, which register do you mean? Talairach? You shouldn't mix versions, but you could use the correct Talairach from 5.0 and use it to fix the 4.3.1 run.
cheers Bruce On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Yolanda Vives wrote: > Dear Freesurfers, > > I have a dataset processed with a classical recon-all of Freesurfer v.4.3.1 > and there are two MRIs that were not segmented correctly due to the > register. After several unsuccessful attempts to improve this step using > tkregister2, finally I have successfully processed them with FS v5.0. Would > it be correct to perform a QDEC analysis to analyse cortical thickness using > all my dataset (mixing MRIs processed with FS 4.3.1 and two of them > processed with FS 5.0) ? > > Thank you for your help, > Yolanda > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
