On 15Jul, 2009, at 11:33 , Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Over the past months I've gotten huge amounts of requests for ATA
related things, so I've whipped up what I use here for FreeBSD 7.2-
Release.
This is a total replacement of the ATA driver, modulerized as in
On 27Jun, 2009, at 14:29 , Bruce Cran wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:11:08 +0200
Søren Schmidt wrote:
This is a total replacement of the ATA driver, modulerized as in -
current, but based on my WIP not from what might have happend to -
current since I gave up maintainership.
It's gre
Over the past months I've gotten huge amounts of requests for ATA
related things, so I've whipped up what I use here for FreeBSD 7.2-
Release.
This is a total replacement of the ATA driver, modulerized as in -
current, but based on my WIP not from what might have happend to -
current since I
On 10Dec, 2008, at 10:11 , Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Thanks for explaining me what the flags do. I'm not skilled enough
to create
the DMA quirks but if you could give me some patches i'll test them.
Also
if you have any other idea on what could i test or how can i debug
this
it would be m
On 7Nov, 2008, at 20:12 , Peter Wemm wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
As stated, FreeBSD's ATA command timeout is hard-set to 5 seconds,
and
is not adjustable without editing the ATA code yourself and
increasing
the value. The FreeNA
I'll look into it
-Søren
--
On 31/10/2008, at 00.00, Michael Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:47:48PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Personally I don't really think ICH7M is capable to do SATA-300.
Intel
datasheet 307013, page 191 says:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:01:55PM -0400, David Boyd wrote:
> > I am attempting to install 7.1-BETA2 (from CD) onto a PC with a Promise
> > SX4060 RAID controller and two Seagate 120GB ATA disk drives.
> >
> > The boot f
On 10Oct, 2008, at 13:58 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:12:11PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:03:20AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, does your patch include any fixes (intentional or
inadvertent) for
Intel Matrix
On 5Oct, 2008, at 13:04 , Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:38:09PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi, All.
I prepared patch to make MFC of ata(4) driver into RELENG_7
before 7.1-RELEASE. Depending on results of the testing patch
will be commited or not (if some regressions wil
Hi
OK, the only "modern" nVidia board I have is MCP51 based, however it
uses the same codepath as the MCP55.
Anyhow, there has been fixes fro these in -current, thats not in any
of the releng's yet.
Please try the attached patch, or even better try a -current kernel.
-Søren
ff
Descripti
Hi
I'll look into that providing I can find HW to work on, IIRC I have
one in the ATA collection but I have to verify when I get to the lab.
-Søren
On 1Jul, 2008, at 11:01 , Daniel Eriksson wrote:
I am having problems with silent data corruption on (some) drives
connected to an MCP55 SAT
On 25Jan, 2008, at 15:05 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 03:52:39 pm Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 23Jan, 2008, at 21:09 , Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoshihiko Sarumaru wrote:
Hello,
I updated my Geode GX1 PC from RELENG_6_2 to RELENG_6_3 and
On 23Jan, 2008, at 21:09 , Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoshihiko Sarumaru wrote:
Hello,
I updated my Geode GX1 PC from RELENG_6_2 to RELENG_6_3 and found
root mount failed after reboot.
This problem was caused by a change to ata-pci.c to pick up wider old
ata c
Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 02:59:36AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > any particular/new issues with RELENG_7 on the Soekris net4801?
> >
> > Thought I should check before upgrading my T23 as a build platform ..
> > I haven't done
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
My laptop drive might be dying. It is a Samsung MP0804H which I have
used for around 28 months without issue.
Every now and then it will click and sound as though it is thermally
recalibrating itself.
I ran SMART diagnostics from smartmontools, and Samsung's own
Zahemszky Gábor wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to know, is it possible to use FreeBSD on on Intel DG9655SS
motherboard with PATA devices. It has 1 PATA and 2 SATA ports,
but the 6-stable kernel doesn't see any devices on PATA. It
doesn't see neither my disk, nor my DVD-writer. I tried with normal
mode, wit
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007 15:21, Søren Schmidt wrote:
= What HW was this again, there has been alot of updates/changes over the
= last year ?
It is now a quad core (dual CPU) Opteron-275 using IWill's DK8X motherboard.
http://www.google.com/search?q=iwill
nent damage that makes it loose data.
What does SMART say on corrected errors etc (if the drive has that info).
-Søren
Please, advise. Thanks!
-mi
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 11:07, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= On Wednesday 01 March 2006, Søren Schmidt wrote:
= = dd if=/dev/ad8 of=/dev/null bs=1
Juraj Lutter wrote:
On 2/27/07, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
> The problem is that your BIOS registers the resources used for AHCI
> operation but apparently hasn't really enabled them.
>
> Look for an option in the BIOS to turn on/off
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have experienced the same regression since 6.2 was branched on an
ASUS amd64 Vintage-PE1 box.
Juraj Lutter wrote:
Feb 26 21:45:25 river kernel: atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xff00-0xff0f at
device 31.0 on pci0
Feb 26 21:45:25 river kernel:
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 1/14/07, Peter Ankerstål <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=1000941
This kind of errors usually denote a hardware problem, either at the
disk or at the controller level.
Check sysutils/smartmontools in the ports.
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
summary: there was some discussion on how to
fix the problem, in 6.x, with "burncd -f /dev/acd0 -v blank" getting
stuck with this message
blanking CD, please wait..
This used to work on 4.x.
6.x changes in two places:
* the ioctl handler, acd_get_progress() in /sy
Jon Passki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
(I'm off list, please include me in any replies)
(Søren, please let me know if you do not want to be emailed in the
future directly! You seem to be the ATA RAID FreeBSD goto guy.
Apologies if you did not want to be so
Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
Hi,
On 10/19/06, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nothing else that that it should work. I dont own any HW that uses this
chip so I cannot test it out. The current support was done for the ARM
port IIRC so things might be different on other systems.
At an
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:46:21PM +0800, Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
We have a Dell Powervault 745N and want to install FreeBSD 6.1-R.
But the installer complains that it can not find out any hard disk.
Since the dmesg contains ata2~5, I think the controller is recognize
Joao Barros wrote:
Hi all,
I was contacted by Chris who had the same problem.
Since I didn't follow up on my problem he asked me if it was solved
and indeed it was solved by Søren and the fix has been committed to
CURRENT:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2006-September/188353.html
I'
Give me a few days and I'll get to it if I dont get any serious issues
before that...
-Søren
On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Soren,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:56:19AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a
I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a resync
is needed.
ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just need a
little more exposure...
-Søren
On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:23:37PM -0400, Dav
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Hello!
We have an amd64 machine with an nVidia3 SATA controller on motherboard.
The drive just came from the manufacturer and the self-tests initiated
via smartctl show no problems:
atapci1: port 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xc800-0xc803,0xc400-0xc407,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc0f,0xb8
On Tor, 2006-03-30 at 12:07 +0100, Adam Retter wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 12:42 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> > On Tor, 2006-03-30 at 11:09 +0100, Adam Retter wrote:
> > > Soren,
> > >
> > > I am using FreeBSD 6-STABLE and have a problem with the atapicam
On Tor, 2006-03-30 at 11:09 +0100, Adam Retter wrote:
> Soren,
>
> I am using FreeBSD 6-STABLE and have a problem with the atapicam driver,
> I have been in contact with Thomas Quinot through the FreeBSD stable
> mailing list (his name was on the code for atapicam), I have sent him
> boot -v -h ou
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:38 PM 13/03/2006, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi,
I was trying out a recent RELENG_6 on a VIA mini ITX board with built
in CF reader. If a CF is present, the box panics at boot (tried with 2
separate boards and different CFs just in case it was hardware). This
is with a RELEN
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:45:53PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:37:07PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:05PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:37:07PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:05PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:02:08PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Hi Soren,
I just went to
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:05PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:02:08PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Hi Soren,
I just went to 6.1-PRE on my main machine, coming from 6.0-STABLE
of roughly end of december.
And
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:02:08PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Hi Soren,
I just went to 6.1-PRE on my main machine, coming from 6.0-STABLE
of roughly end of december.
And I hit some stuff that really worries me:
- the freshly built kernel keels over with
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Hi Soren,
I just went to 6.1-PRE on my main machine, coming from 6.0-STABLE
of roughly end of december.
And I hit some stuff that really worries me:
- the freshly built kernel keels over with (hand transcribed):
ata3: reiniting channel SATA connect ...
SATA connected
sata
Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:46:52 +1030
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking at getting a motherboard based on nForce 3 or 4, and I
am wondering if the RAID will be usable?
I don't mind if I have to use the BIOS to setup/rebuild the array,
but I don't want
Michael Butler wrote:
1) the ata-raid driver currently leaks ata_composite and ata_request
structures into "neverland" in a mirrored configuration. This can be
observed using "sysctl -a | grep ^ata_" and noting the increasing
"in-use" count as time goes on. Eventually, this causes the kernel to
Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote:
El Jueves 10 Noviembre 2005 16:06, Michael Butler escribió:
David Taylor wrote:
| [snip]
|
| I'm still seeing (lots) of these messages (below) on 6.0-RELEASE.
| Should I just file a PR about it, and is there anything else that
| would be useful to track down what's
On 07/11/2005, at 18:10, Michael Butler wrote:
| I wrote:
| | cvsup'd and built: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #4: Fri Nov 4 18:07:30
EST 2005
|
| ~ [ .. ]
|
| | Nov 6 16:43:27 mail kernel: DOH! ata_alloc_request failed!
| | Nov 6 16:43:27 mail kernel: FAILURE - out of memory in
| ata_raid_init_reque
s/LAPDANCE i386
I've just committed a fix for this a few hours ago..
Søren Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
:)
Get me the output from dmesg so I can see whats under the hood, might
help explain things.
Søren Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
On 23/08/2005, at 19:19, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Hi there Soeren,
using parallel ATA drive at our new TYAN motherboard I see
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src# atacontrol mode 0
atacontrol: Invalid device 0
the same for other channel-related commands such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src# atacontrol
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be
broken now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same
problem.
The ioctl ABI to ATA has changed, yo
On 11/08/2005, at 0:28, Randy Bush wrote:
As I said I need reports on 6.0, the ATA driver as is in 5.4 is not
supported by me unless you use the ATA mkIII patches..
you know, we just upgraded a system from 4.11 to 7.0 and see problems.
we have been chasing cables, and never considered that w
On 10/08/2005, at 22:51, Karl Denninger wrote:
Since I came in late in this, I need to know what kind of controller
we are talking about, and if the problem is still present in 6.0.
I plan to backport ATA from 6.0 to 5-stable when it has settled, so
6.0 is the one and only (pre)release to test
On 10/08/2005, at 20:29, J. T. Farmer wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/10/05, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since I came in late in this, I need to know what kind of controller
we are talking about, and if the problem is still present in 6.0.
I plan to backport ATA from
On 10/08/2005, at 20:05, Scot Hetzel wrote:
Since I came in late in this, I need to know what kind of controller
we are talking about, and if the problem is still present in 6.0.
I plan to backport ATA from 6.0 to 5-stable when it has settled, so
6.0 is the one and only (pre)release to test wit
On 10/08/2005, at 17:44, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/10/05, Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:31 AM 10/08/2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
Also, I've yet to see a developer commit on the list that they
WILL fix it
if
suc
On 24/07/2005, at 23:28, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I'm curious if the Promise Supertrak SX6000 is still not bootable
under FreeBSD 5.4 or 6. The man page never stated this before, and
it would be nice to know.
I don't think so, the problem is in our boot code, not in the sx6000.
That said, some
Nate Lawson wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
If you've been having "memory modified after free" panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I
Nate Lawson wrote:
If you've been having "memory modified after free" panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I haven't tested for it there.
The bug is triggered by timeo
New version available for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3m.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3m.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3m.tar.gz
This time the diff must be reapplied as there are new changes in there.
Items in this release:
o Du
Nate Lawson wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
If you've been having "memory modified after free" panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I hav
Nate Lawson wrote:
If you've been having "memory modified after free" panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I haven't tested for it there.
The bug is triggered by timeout
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, 10:32+0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
New version available for testing
Marcus Grando wrote:
I test another disk (SAMSUNG SV8004H) in secondary and work with UDMA66.
OK, so the problem is not general of nature...
Have you tried this disk on another board ?
I have another computer with 4.11-STABLE / QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 30 and
occurs same problem.
--
ad0s1g: UDMA IC
Marcus Grando wrote:
Hi
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
I test all combinations (with/without apic | with/without ACPI), and
problems persist.
OK.
It will be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Grando wrote:
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
Just an observation, but my Promi
Marcus Grando wrote:
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
--
-Søren
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Søren Schmidt wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
New version available for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org
Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
Currently, it works only under 4.3GB disk.
Same a 1.
No. See kern/61960.
Wrong, ATA mk3 does solve the problem but using the "
Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
ATA-mkIII has three big problems.
I'd call it minor issues on PC98 :)
1. It seems that CHS mode is broken.
Only in the case of "virtual geometry" as used by PC98 only.
The problem is that the the real not virtual geometry is used for the
tranlation from LBA to CHS.
2. A
Freddie Cash wrote:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
Just curious if this includes support for new chipsets or not. Not a
big deal if it doesn't, just curious.
I've got a Toshiba laptop that, unfortunately, uses the ATI IGP/IXP
chipset, which only gets detected as U
Tim Welch wrote:
A problem still exists with 48-bit addressing. This url details a fix
I've been using for the last 4 months or so with no issues yet.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2004-October/008821.html
Are you stil experiencing problems with atamkIII ?
In that case its a di
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 15:00 schrieb Søren Schmidt:
[...]
As always, enjoy and let me know how it goes...
It's running here on several RELENG_5 machines. Like with j I also can't find
any problems with k :)
But the strange 16MB/s limit on my ICH2 (i
Søren Schmidt wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c rev 1.235 conflicts, could you please
Randy Bush wrote:
Since I cannot debug this, I have no way of finding out whats wrong.
I will look at it when ACPI allows me to use suspend/resume again, until
then I'll concentrated on things that I can work on...
where's my refund? :-)
more seriously, shall we do a fund to get you a laptoy on
Randy Bush wrote:
diff -u -r1.20 ata-all.c
--- ata-all.c 2005/02/03 17:02:31 1.20
+++ ata-all.c 2005/02/07 14:27:57
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
void
ata_udelay(int interval)
{
-if (1 || interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
+if (interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily imagine
that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing really
changed...
my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, loc
Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
Hi, Søren
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine except on resume.
Hmm, thats one corner I cant test, suspend/resume dies horribly in ACPI
on all 3 notebooks I have since september last year or thereabouts...
After suspend, my
Ben Stuyts wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005, at 21:52, Søren Schmidt wrote:
o ATA RAID can only read metadata not write them. This means that
arrays can be picked up from the BIOS, but they cannot be created
from FreeBSD. This is being worked on for the final release as is
RAID5
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for some time.
It contains a number of new things, and lacks a few features of the old code.
New items include:
o ATA is now fully newbus'd and split into modules.
This means that on a mo
Pertti Kosunen wrote:
My READ_DMA timeout problem with 160GB disk partitially solved. Asus
A7A266 southbridge (ALi 1535D+) don't support DMA with LBA48. This is
somehow worked around with Windows drivers, so is same possible in
FreeBSD also?
I guess their "workaround" is to use PIO mode to acces
Doug White wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
This is why I don't trust ATA RAID for fault tolerance -- it'll save your
data, but the system will tank. Since the disk state is maintained by
the OS and not abstracted by a separate processor, if a disk dies in a
particularly bad way the s
Peter Radcliffe wrote:
Sren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
Well, you probably should take care of your sister first :)
And no I dont have a paypal account, so far I've got by fine without it,
by using other means as checks, wiretransfers etc etc...
Do you have a list of things (partic
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 9:49 PM +0100 12/9/04, Søren Schmidt wrote:
I'm going to work on it soon thats for sure, however I have lots
on the burner currently so its no rush. However all kinds of
(S)ATA/ATAPI gear is always most welcome here in the lab, the
levels of support I can provi
Peter Radcliffe wrote:
Sren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
SATA ATAPI devices are not supported yet.
There are a few gotcha's though. Not all SATA controllers does support
SATA ATAPI even if out driver would, so its a mixed blessing for now.
Anyhow, as soon as I can get my hands on a S
Rob wrote:
Hi guys,
This is the first post I have seen on stable about SATA. (ok, maybe I'm
not subscribed to the right lists) Anyway I bought a brand new
beautiful Plextor DVD+RW SATA drive (PX712SA) for use on my AMD64+3800
machine. Win XP64-beta won't recognize it, and neither will FreeBSD
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 1:01 AM -0600 12/7/04, Tim Welch wrote:
I'm getting NID not found/DMA errors on 5-STABLE with a Seagate 200gb
sata drive:
ad2: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA status=51
error=10 LBA=268435455
This appears to be a result of 48-bit addressing. Any time a write is
attempted to th
It seems Eugene Grosbein wrote:
[ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> "S?ren Schmidt" wrote:
>
> > Of cause it should, and belive me I'm doing all I can to try get this
> > nailed. But I do have a real life as well, and a fulltime job, 3 kids,
> > vife and lots of other important things
It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> SS> If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to
> SS> the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the
> SS> busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable.
>
> Well then it's another problem in -sta
It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Hello there Soren,
>
> any chances patch for ata subsystem at
>
> date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45;
>
> that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R?
If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to
the -stable branch at all, it
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > I guess there needs to be some way to tell the controller to use ad6 as
> > > part of the rebuild no ?
> >
> >You need to do a atacontrol detach on the failed device, then an
> >atacontrol attach on the new disk. BTW you dont need to boot
> >inbetween :)
>
> atac
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Yet, when I go to do a rebuild,
>
> raidtest3# atacontrol rebuild ar0
> atacontrol: ioctl(ATARAIDREBUILD): Operation not supported by device
> raidtest3#
>
> I guess there needs to be some way to tell the controller to use ad6 as
> part of the rebuild no ?
You nee
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 08:58 AM 4/2/02 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> >If a disk in a RAID1 goes bad, the driver will continue to use the
> >good half of the mirror, and log the fact that the mirror is now
> >in degraded mode. You can then use atacontrol to d
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> It looks like something in stable seem to break High Point 404 support
> using the vendor's drivers and RAID administrator software.
> http://www.highpoint-tech.com/rr404_down.htm
Highpoint's driver are for FreeBSD-4.5.
They wont work with -stable and what is to
It seems Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I saw that new versions of several ATA programs including ata-all.c
> had been loaded into stable. I hoped that this would fix the trap 12
> when resuming from a suspend. No luck. Ian Dowses patches worked fine,
> but the code in stable still crashes.
The fixes tha
Well, subject says it all, the ATA driver in -stable is now functionally
identical to that in -current.
Please let me know asap if you encounter any (new) problems with the
ATA driver after this commit.
Thanks goes to all that have helped testing this over the last weeks,
and especially to Advan
It seems Nils Holland wrote:
> root@poison> pciconf -r -b pci0:0:0 0x0:0xff
Thanks! this was a kernel without the corruption fix, and it shows
that you need it, the MWQ bug has been fixed in your BIOS...
I have a new improved patch in the works that covers more chipset
comboes, it'll go into -cu
It seems Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Agreed, it looks like the "MWQ bug" isn't addressed by soren's patch. The
> decription at
> http://www.networking.tzo.com/net/software/readme/faqvl019.htm
> doesn't give enough info to patch it, but this post to the linux-kernel
> mailing list seems to shed more
It seems Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Ok, I have more information on Nils problem. First of all, Soren's
> patch greatly reduced the rate of corruption. It took 25 loops of
> Nils 'cp' test to generate the corruption.
Hmm, did the second change I posted change anything ?
> However,
It seems Matthew Gilbert wrote:
> > So, general question to everyone having crashes during heavy
> > IDE workloads: Please post your /var/run/dmesg.boot
> > output.
> atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on
You have the VIA 82c686b southbridge chip which is known to cause sev
It seems Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I am trying to determine if our ATA/VIA setup code may have issues. I
> did a google search and came up with a linux-quirks patch which may
> apply to the random corruption problems people have been reporting.
> Here is the URL:
>
>
>http://w
96 matches
Mail list logo
