On 2012-10-05 10:16, dweimer wrote:
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion, I
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion, I have found the
~/.subverison/serv
Hi all,
same problem here as well. Apparently this is in relation to updating
Cairo. See the thread on the forum:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=178116
=> downgrade Cairo to 1.10
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/cairo/distinfo
Would be good to see this fixed ;)
O
On 21/05/2012 23:23, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear folks,
I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
I have a similar problem. I have a Dell Inspiron 1318 running 9.0 amd. I
use KDE4 (kde-4.7.4_1). After a
> Dear folks,
>
> I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
> working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
>
> On screen I have
>
> drm0: on vgapci0
> info: [drm] AGP at 0x2000 256MB
> info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730
>
> I have also:
>
Dear folks,
I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
On screen I have
drm0: on vgapci0
info: [drm] AGP at 0x2000 256MB
info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730
I have also:
xfsettingsd: Fatal I
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> @All
>
> I have solved the problem with TeTeX. I had to remove symlinks to
> files created by texlive manually and reinstall the ports one at a
> time and I am back. Sorry for the noise.
>
> BTW,
> I figured out that I needed /usr/ports
@All
I have solved the problem with TeTeX. I had to remove symlinks to
files created by texlive manually and reinstall the ports one at a
time and I am back. Sorry for the noise.
BTW,
I figured out that I needed /usr/ports/print/latex-pgf/ for the
diffyqs.tar.gz (Differential Equations Book sou
@all
I could not get tlgmr to remove texlive
/*** try to removal of texlive */
tricorehome# tlmgr --uninstall
Useless use of log in void context at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 536.
Useless use of log in void context at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 636.
Useless use of log in void context at /usr/loc
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> I have successfully updated most ports, but having problems with mplayer:
>
> /usr/local/live/BasicUsageEnvironment/libBasicUsageEnvironment.a
> -L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
> -lico
Dear folks,
I have successfully updated most ports, but having problems with mplayer:
/usr/local/live/BasicUsageEnvironment/libBasicUsageEnvironment.a
-L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
-liconv -lncurses -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lungif -lcdda_interface
-lcdda_parano
Can confirm that this problem still exists.
same log as described.
latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
# be compatible with Debian
find: /usr/ports/print/latex-cjk/work/ccmap: No such file or directory
rgrds
Rafal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
y have a mess now and have no more time to work on it
tonight. I will try again tomorrow.
Best regards,
Fred
On 04/25/11 07:29, Frédéric Perrin wrote:
Hello Fred,
Fred writes:
I ran into a problem when updating ports on 8.1-RELEASE (i386).
~/print/latex-cjk doesn't want to build.
===
Hello Fred,
Fred writes:
> I ran into a problem when updating ports on 8.1-RELEASE (i386).
> ~/print/latex-cjk doesn't want to build.
>
> ===> Patching for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
> Ignoring previously applied (or
Hello,
I ran into a problem when updating ports on 8.1-RELEASE (i386).
~/print/latex-cjk doesn't want to build.
===> Patching for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--sav
I'm about to upgrade my ports, since it's over 3 months since the last
upgrade I'm expecting this to be a mega upgrade. In preparation for
this I've run portmaster -na to get all the configs up to date and
avoid the need for frequent manual intervention when I run the upgrade.
This highlighted
Polytropon writes:
> > I am now thinking which one is better.
>
> I have used portupgrade / portinstall in the past, but I think
> portmaster really is the way to go, at least for me,
As far as I can tell, for 90-95% of tasks they're
indistinguishable. If (generic) you have special
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:29:57 +0700
Pongthep Kulkrisada articulated:
> > Programs like portmaster can be really helpful here.
> Yes, it is what I am expecting. Thank you.
> I read the handbook. There are 2 choices i.e. portmanager and
> portmaster. I am now thinking which one is better.
> I must
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:29:57 +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada
wrote:
> I checked /var/db/pkg; I have 464 ports installed on my system (including X).
> I would probably not do so.
The pkg_add utility is especially useful when building a new
installation from scratch, because it additionally automaticall
Hi Polytropon,
Firstly, thanks for your suggestion.
* Polytropon (free...@edvax.de) wrote:
> You can consider using "pkgadd -r" to install binary packages.
> Those are quite synchon with the ports tree (as they are
> centrally built from the ports tree).
I checked /var/db/pkg; I have 464 ports in
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:30:04 +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada
wrote:
> But it takes very long time to rebuild all ports.
> Main problem is KDE, big big ports.
> Okay, I shall do it, when I have time.
You can consider using "pkgadd -r" to install binary packages.
Those are quite synchon with the ports t
* Chuck Swiger (cswi...@mac.com) wrote:
> Yes, it's not enough.
>
> When you upgrade the base OS to a new major version (ie, going from
> 7.x to 8.x), the system libraries get bumped to a new version, but any
> libraries coming from ports are still linked against the older version
> of the f
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:44:16PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>Just update to release 8.0 a few days ago, then when update ports by
> csup, error occurs:
>
> Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
> ' at line 469 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 0)
>
At a guess, yo
Hi,
Just update to release 8.0 a few days ago, then when update ports by
csup, error occurs:
Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
' at line 469 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 0)
what should I do? thank you!!
TFC
___
freebsd-
Thanks to all for your detailed and informative replies to my questions. I
have many new things to try out.
> I can't speak for anyone else, but long posts don't bother me. I hope
> > we've clarified things for you. Welcome to FreeBSD!
Thanks. Its good to be here!
-Richard
___
On Thu 03 Dec 2009 at 07:32:33 PST Warren Block wrote:
As far as "batch" or even -a, I update the ports tree often and prefer
to manually upgrade ports as needed, usually with portupgrade -r. A
lot of people seem to like -R; maybe I have the dependencies backwards.
Since this is a newbie threa
re better met by doing a preconfigure,
that is, by answering the config dialogs for all of the updating ports
before proceeding to the actual build of any of them. portmaster does
this by default, and portupgrade has the --config switch.
Related to the above, are the default options that appear
S4mmael wrote:
2009/12/3 Richard Mace :
1.) Keeping installed ports/packages up to date.
As far as I can tell from the docs, perhaps the most convenient method is to
use something like:
# portsnap fetch update
# pkgdb -F
# portupgrade --batch -aP (do I need an "R" here?)
I don't
2009/12/3 Richard Mace :
> 1.) Keeping installed ports/packages up to date.
>
> As far as I can tell from the docs, perhaps the most convenient method is to
> use something like:
>
> # portsnap fetch update
> # pkgdb -F
> # portupgrade --batch -aP (do I need an "R" here?)
>
I don't see any rea
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Richard Mace wrote:
I recently installed FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE on my home desktop and am considering
making the switch from Debian GNU/Linux.
I have a few questions which I am hoping the list can clarify for me.
1.) Keeping installed ports/packages up to date.
As far as I ca
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Richard Mace wrote:
> I recently installed FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE on my home desktop and am
> considering
> making the switch from Debian GNU/Linux.
>
> I have a few questions which I am hoping the list can clarify for me.
>
> 1.) Keeping installed ports/packages up t
I recently installed FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE on my home desktop and am considering
making the switch from Debian GNU/Linux.
I have a few questions which I am hoping the list can clarify for me.
1.) Keeping installed ports/packages up to date.
As far as I can tell from the docs, perhaps the most co
Bert-Jan wrote:
"Roy Stuivenberg" writes:
After I completed my Freebsd 7.1 stable, and updated all the ports, I
got
prompted with another logonscreen.
Whatever I try, I can't login with my useraccount and even not logon as
root.
This happened severall times now, the only way was to reinst
> "Roy Stuivenberg" writes:
>
>> After I completed my Freebsd 7.1 stable, and updated all the ports, I
>> got
>> prompted with another logonscreen.
>> Whatever I try, I can't login with my useraccount and even not logon as
>> root.
>> This happened severall times now, the only way was to reinstall
"Roy Stuivenberg" writes:
> After I completed my Freebsd 7.1 stable, and updated all the ports, I got
> prompted with another logonscreen.
> Whatever I try, I can't login with my useraccount and even not logon as
> root.
> This happened severall times now, the only way was to reinstall everything
Hello,
After I completed my Freebsd 7.1 stable, and updated all the ports, I got
prompted with another logonscreen.
Whatever I try, I can't login with my useraccount and even not logon as
root.
This happened severall times now, the only way was to reinstall everything,
and I was hoping to resolve
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 06:41:26AM +0100, Huub wrote:
> >
> >Hmm, how did you end up with 7.2 installed, with the old /usr/X11R6 dir?
> >I thought that went away in the transition from 6.9 to 7.2...
>
> So it apparently should be..
>
> >
> >Anyhow, following Kris' instructions in UPDATING should
Hmm, how did you end up with 7.2 installed, with the old /usr/X11R6 dir?
I thought that went away in the transition from 6.9 to 7.2...
So it apparently should be..
Anyhow, following Kris' instructions in UPDATING should see you through
the upgrade OK. I did it quite painlessly on a few machi
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 09:57:20PM +0100, Huub wrote:
> >
> >First off, you should probably update your ports tree. Firefox is now
> >at 2.0.0.11,1, and xorg-libraries is at 7.3_1.
>
> I started with updating the ports tree.
>
> >
> >Then try the upgrade again. If it still fails, show us the erro
First off, you should probably update your ports tree. Firefox is now
at 2.0.0.11,1, and xorg-libraries is at 7.3_1.
I started with updating the ports tree.
Then try the upgrade again. If it still fails, show us the errors from
the xorg-libraries build.
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 09:18:58PM +0100, Huub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a quite some time of not using the machine, I decided to update a
> PentiumIII pc running FreeBSD 6.2. Starting with "portupgrade -R
> firefox" it ends with:
>
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages
> found
Hi,
After a quite some time of not using the machine, I decided to update a
PentiumIII pc running FreeBSD 6.2. Starting with "portupgrade -R
firefox" it ends with:
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
---> Skipping 'graphics/cairo' (cairo-1.4.10) beca
> I don't understand this statement. I have killed portupgrade on numerous
> occasions, both locally and remotely, and have never had a problem
> restarting later. If you mean portupgrade doesn't restart where it left
> off, then yes, that's true, but only in the sense that it goes through all
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
RW wrote:
> Something like
>
> portupgrade -fr perl
>
> is pretty hard to restart efficiently.
A good trick is to use the date comparison functionality portupgrade
provides. So you can do something like:
portupgrade -fr perl -x '>=perl'
meani
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:47:52 -0600
Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On December 23, 2007 1:19:21 AM +0100 Peter Schuller
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In particular, given a re-build (e.g. upgraded) port X, all ports
> > depending on X will also be re-built regardless of whethe
--On December 23, 2007 1:19:21 AM +0100 Peter Schuller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In particular, given a re-build (e.g. upgraded) port X, all ports
depending on X will also be re-built regardless of whether that is
required according to the dependency relation. This is handled in such
a way th
> What's the difference between them?
The main difference that is relevant to me personally is that portmanager
makes no attempt to be too smart about avoiding compilation, and it is fully
restartable without affecting the results.
It rebuilds ports in such a way that the result is, in theory,
On Dec 22, 2007 11:39 AM, Robe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to update some ports. I'm using FreeBSD 6.2.
>
> I was reading in the handbook and there are two ways to update them through
> the portupdate and portmanager.
>
> What's the difference between them?
>
> --
> Robe.
Each one
Hi,
I want to update some ports. I'm using FreeBSD 6.2.
I was reading in the handbook and there are two ways to update them through
the portupdate and portmanager.
What's the difference between them?
--
Robe.
En el verdadero amor, el alma oculta al cuerpo.
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:22:03 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW writes:
>
> > You don't have to set anything globally in make.conf, you can do it
> > like this:
> >
> > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/net-mgmt/net-snmp}
> > WITH_TKMIB=yes
> > .endif
>
> That looks good.
>
> > and
RW writes:
> >3) It is possible to put port-related settings in
> > /etc/make.conf. I discourage this, as that file gets used for
> > /every/ make session and I consider it asking for trouble to clutter
> > it with items that may accidentally overlap with another port. (The
> > risk is
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:46:55 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) It is possible to put port-related settings in
> /etc/make.conf. I discourage this, as that file gets used for
> /every/ make session and I consider it asking for trouble to clutter
> it with items that may acci
Peter Clark writes:
> If you installed a port with some additional config args can you
> either supply them the upgrade program or can it be reread from
> the previous install somehow? I really am just trying to find a
> relatively simple way to make sure that a port gets upgraded and
> that
On October 18, 2007 at 12:16PM Peter Clark wrote:
{ ... ]
> Now that I have reread what I wrote, it seems a bit unclear. I have not
> used either service before. Seeing as I am looking at using this in
> production server environment I would not look at frequently making
> changes as one might
Robert Huff wrote:
Peter Clark writes:
Is there a "better" (I realize everything is relative) option
when looking at portupgrade vs portmanager? From what I am
reading it seems that portmanager will upgrade and reinstall a
port and all it's dependencies no matter if the dependency needs
it
Peter Clark writes:
> Is there a "better" (I realize everything is relative) option
> when looking at portupgrade vs portmanager? From what I am
> reading it seems that portmanager will upgrade and reinstall a
> port and all it's dependencies no matter if the dependency needs
> it or not and
Hello,
Is there a "better" (I realize everything is relative) option when
looking at portupgrade vs portmanager? From what I am reading it seems
that portmanager will upgrade and reinstall a port and all it's
dependencies no matter if the dependency needs it or not and portupgrade
will only d
"Frank Shute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:45:29AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> Quoting from /usr/ports/UPDATING (which may itself have been updated
>> after you did your ports download, so you may not yet have this advice
>> on your hard disk):
>>
>> Users of
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:45:29AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> Quoting from /usr/ports/UPDATING (which may itself have been updated
> after you did your ports download, so you may not yet have this advice
> on your hard disk):
>
> Users of nvidia-driver will have to make sure Composite exte
"Aryeh Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> An updated nvidia-driver should be released soon.
>
>
> I know one of the issues is some kernel mods nvidia needs but regardless
> is their any kind of ETA?
Kernel modifications are not needed for this.
NVidia don't release their developme
>
> An updated nvidia-driver should be released soon.
I know one of the issues is some kernel mods nvidia needs but regardless
is their any kind of ETA?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Quoting from /usr/ports/UPDATING (which may itself have been updated
after you did your ports download, so you may not yet have this advice
on your hard disk):
Users of nvidia-driver will have to make sure Composite extension is
turned off and start Xorg with the following command:
$ startx
I'm running FBSD 6.stable and I just updated my ports using portupgrade and
everything went fine. Most of the xorg ports got updated but now I get this
error everytime I try to startx:
Release Date: 5 September 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i
Hi,
Nope, you're good to go
It worked. Now I have an updated ports collection and I'm feeling pleased
with myself :-)
Thanks guys.
Lisa Casey
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:05:32 -0500
"Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> One last question and I think I'll be good to go:
>
> In my ports-supfile, I've changed the host to one that is local to me in the
> USA. Do I need to make any changes to
> *default release=cvs tag=.
Thi
Nope, you're good to go
On 3/14/06, Lisa Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> One last question and I think I'll be good to go:
>
> In my ports-supfile, I've changed the host to one that is local to me in the
> USA. Do I need to make any changes to
> *default release=cvs tag=.
> *defa
Hi again,
One last question and I think I'll be good to go:
In my ports-supfile, I've changed the host to one that is local to me in the
USA. Do I need to make any changes to
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
Or can I just leave these as the defaults? I understand every
Hi Lisa,
The supfile just upgrades the sources. You actually have to build and
install it for it to make any changes. Using the standard supfile,
you can just do portupgrade -arR and it will only upgrade your ports,
it won't touch the base system at all. Then when you want to upgrade
the base s
Lisa Casey wrote:
Next I need the supfile. I took a look at
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile (I think that's what I want)
Look at and edit '/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile'
there you need to change the line with
'*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org'
to the host nearest to y
Can't I just update the ports without updating the entire system?
Yes. Look at /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile
You _are_ on the right track, and you can do what you want.
Thanks Bill. Duh, I was looking right at that and didn't see the
ports-supfile. I'll go take a look now.
Lis
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:46:09 -0500
"Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next I need the supfile. I took a look at
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile (I think that's what I want) but
> that looks like something that is going to upgrade the entire system (as I
> said - probably a g
Hi Folks,
I might be a bit confused here. If so, I'm sure you'll tell me about it ;-)
I'm running FreeBSD 5.3. I want to update my ports. So I went to the FreeBSD
handbook and started reading up on how to do that. According to what I read,
I need to install cvsup then create a supfile. OK, so
Odds are you're doing a make deinstall/reinstall in the wrong place. You
do that to the dependency that fails, not the port you're upgrading.
The best way to handle this is to make sure that your ports tree is
current using cvsup, and if it's not already installed, install
sysutils/port-maint
> A second and possibly related problem is that building an index fails. I
> read the following on http://freebsd.org/ports
first, cvsup your ports tree, then cd /usr/src && make fetchindex.
then try to build again. i'm not sure if this will work, but it's
where i would start.
luke
_
Hi,
I have a box running 4.8. I only have ssh access so I can't update the OS
at the moment, but I would like to update certain ports. I'm running into
a few problems. The worst is when I update a port it tries to update /
install dependencies that are already up to date. For example, when
On Friday 25 March 2005 06:49 am, Nigel Moore wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've been trying to update the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 install without
> success. I've just taken the standard ports-supfile, changed the
> default base to "/usr" and added my local cvsup mirror, but I get
> continual connection time-o
Hello
I've been trying to update the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 install without
success. I've just taken the standard ports-supfile, changed the
default base to "/usr" and added my local cvsup mirror, but I get
continual connection time-outs (transcript below).
I've also tried other cvsup servers i
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:33 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gee, I did that this morning - make fetchindex that is - and when I ran
> "portversion -vL=" I learned that 14 of the installed packages were to
> advanced and I needed to go backwards. I wonder when that INDEX-5 was
Hi!
Has anyone encountered the following error. I'm using Freebsd 5.3.
daffy# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..gnustep-slideshow-0.3: "/usr/ports/graphics/slideshowkit"
non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
===> graphics/gnustep-slideshow failed
*
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 06:10 pm, epilogue wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:17:09 -0600
>
> "Cody Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After running cvsup, I then ran portdb -Uu and received the
> > following error.
> >
> > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> > wait
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:17:09 -0600
"Cody Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After running cvsup, I then ran portdb -Uu and received the following
> error.
>
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..gnustep-slideshow-0.3: "/usr/ports/graphics/slideshowkit"
> non-exis
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 05:17:09PM -0600, Cody Holland wrote:
> After running cvsup, I then ran portdb -Uu and received the following
> error.
>
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..gnustep-slideshow-0.3: "/usr/ports/graphics/slideshowkit"
> non-existent -- dependen
try:
pkgdb -F
--
Marijn van Vliet,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lassie.student.utwente.nl/rodin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
After running cvsup, I then ran portdb -Uu and received the following
error.
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..gnustep-slideshow-0.3: "/usr/ports/graphics/slideshowkit"
non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
===> graphics/gnustep-slideshow failed
*** Error code 1
On Sunday 03 October 2004 11:45 am, robg wrote:
> I update my ports every couple of days, and there were only a small
> amount today that needed to be updated, so I ran the cvsup to update
> ports file
>
> I then typed `portsdb -Uu` and this came up:
>
> server# portsdb -Uu
> Updating the ports ind
I update my ports every couple of days, and there were only a small
amount today that needed to be updated, so I ran the cvsup to update
ports file
I then typed `portsdb -Uu` and this came up:
server# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..***
Error code 1
1
robg wrote:
> hi,
>
> I originally ran pkgdb -F and then portupgrade -a to upgrade my port
> packages, now when I run pkg_version and portversion I get two
> different answers:
>
> can someone tell mew why portversion is saying that?
Hi,
Your index files are out of date. Try this:
# cd /usr/po
hi,
I originally ran pkgdb -F and then portupgrade -a to upgrade my port
packages, now when I run pkg_version and portversion I get two
different answers:
here are all the commands:
35218# pkgdb -F
---> Checking the package registry database
35218#
35218# portversion
autoconf
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:42:57AM +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately, pkgdb -u does NOT rebuild from scratch, but simply refreshes
> itself from the directories in /var/pkg/db.
> Is there a way I could delete all those directories and make pkgdb go look and
> rebuild the db/directori
I am nearing the end of a tortuous path to upgrade my system so that the
/usr/ports/ is in the correct format and the pkg db reflects the truth about
what I have installed.
Unfortunately, pkgdb -u does NOT rebuild from scratch, but simply refreshes
itself from the directories in /var/pkg/db.
Is th
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Dino Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't use the cvsup method of updating my ports
> collection because I'm behind a proxy server and no
> matter what I try (like putting HTTP_PROXY = my.proxy
> in my environment as superuser and rerunning cvsup),
>
I can't use the cvsup method of updating my ports
collection because I'm behind a proxy server and no
matter what I try (like putting HTTP_PROXY = my.proxy
in my environment as superuser and rerunning cvsup),
my system can't seem to connect.
Is there another way of obtaining the same?
In the
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 14:46, saad Hage (hotmail) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How I can update Ports via Wingate Proxy? Actually I receive an error
> saying me he cannot found the host name.
Try setting HTTP_PROXY and FTP_PROXY before you upgrade / add a package like
this :
export HTTP_PROXY=the.proxy.a
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 1:33 pm, Rishi Chopra wrote:
> I installed perl, so I'm no longer getting the 'perl: not found' message
> (any reason why perl isn't installed when installing the ports tree??)
Just because you installed the ports tree does not mean you installed Perl. If
you did via th
ase wait..
And then there's no additional output. Is the server working on the
request, or has the request hung?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rishi Chopra
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Updating P
Do you have perl installed? Run "which perl" and see if it finds it.
Kind regards,
Elvar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rishi Chopra
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Updating Ports Index
What FBSD version are you running?
Did you download the cvsup ports-base?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rishi
Chopra
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Updating Ports Index
For some reason, I can't
On Monday 05 January 2004 05:22 pm, Rishi Chopra wrote:
> For some reason, I can't seem to update the index for the ports database:
>
> idfubar# cd /usr/ports
> idfubar# make index
> Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..perl: not found
> perl: not found
> Done.
Install Perl?!
>
> I also tried attemp
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 18:22, Rishi Chopra wrote:
> For some reason, I can't seem to update the index for the ports database:
>
> idfubar# cd /usr/ports
> idfubar# make index
> Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..perl: not found
> perl: not found
> Done.
>
> I also tried attempting my first 'portsdb
For some reason, I can't seem to update the index for the ports database:
idfubar# cd /usr/ports
idfubar# make index
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..perl: not found
perl: not found
Done.
I also tried attempting my first 'portsdb -Uu' after a successful CVSUp,
but am running into some problems:
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
