allows the system to work
through proxy / nat, since the individual ID is generated the first time you
connect to the system, and used going forward …
On 2011-12-10, at 11:06 PM, Alex Libman wrote:
> Dear BSD Stats Team,
>
> I just wanted to drop you a line and thank you for bsdstats. I
test for validity. So now I am using a new gmail account.
This is the kind of service that is all too often lacking these days. Thank
you, whoever you were, for doing such a great job. Makes me proud to be
associated with FreeBSD ... have been since 2.x.
Gary Dunn
Open Slate Project
Thank you everybody for your help!
From: Matthias Apitz
To: Edward
Cc: Dánielisz László ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, September 23, 2010 8:19:16 AM
Subject: Re: migrate system disk
El día Thursday, September 23, 2010 a las 09:37:42AM +0800
Thanks to all people who program, develop and h/-\ck for
FreeBSD - it is a great free system and best choice ...
Thanks!
- anonymous
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscri
I just installed FreeBSD 8. I'm not sure which developers had a hand
in the new USB stack, but I appreciate the effort put forth. Thank you
all! Finally, I can use my printer without having to hack the ulpt.c
file. I'm so happy!
:-
"http://www.mylistmanager.co.za"; | List management
"http://www.mylistmanager.co.za";| Bulk SMS Marketing
"http://www.mylistmanager.co.za";
"http://www.mylistmanager.co.za/cgi-bin/uls/uls_admin.cgi?register";
Thank You for surfing the MyListManager website.
Now th
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:36:02 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Need to edit
> rc.conf, but FS won't allow.> > Lisandro Grullon escribió:> > Hi all,> > I
> was playing around with rc.conf under /etc and accidentally didn
as going to show off FreeBSD's network speed as a
> > comparison test to show my coworkers that Linux and 2000 is not the only
> > option.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > --
> > Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com
> > ~
>
> Check http://vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/
My
On Sep 14, 2006, at 6:33 AM, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
On 13 September 2006, at 15:25, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On the other hand, you might have heard that Mac OS X is based on
FreeBSD.
Although it is based on BSD, I don't think it's FreeBSD it was
based on. I think it goes al
se it is CLEAR. Clear Structure, clear Doc, clear
Policy. But all the guys on this mailing list probably already know
this... Now, i have one simple question related to this: where and
whom can I tell THANK YOU ? GOOD WORK ? For providing such a great OS.
Secondly: beeing miself an ex-gamer
On 13 September 2006, at 15:25, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On the other hand, you might have heard that Mac OS X is based on
FreeBSD.
Although it is based on BSD, I don't think it's FreeBSD it was based
on. I think it goes all the way back to 4.2BSD. Or something.
They removed all the cle
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:16 PM, felix.schalck wrote:
Do you think the interest that mac developpers pay on freebsd-
stable is a good thing for FreeBSD ? I mean: for further
developpement and general supporting of the OS ?
Sure. But the effect is better observed by noticing which parts of
one
"Evolution of Mac OS X
Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD): Part of the history of Mac OS X
goes back to Berkeley Software Distributions (BSD) UNIX of the early
seventies. Specifically, Mac OS X is based in part on BSD 4.4 Lite.
On a system level, many of the design decisions are made t
On Sep 13, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
Unfortunately, Mac OS games just don't run on anything but Mac OS
itself. Many Linux games and some windows ones run flawlessly on
FreeBSD, though, with no or subtle performance penalties.
For commercial game software, Andrew is certainly ri
cause it is CLEAR. Clear Structure, clear Doc, clear Policy. But
all the guys on this mailing list probably already know this... Now, i
have one simple question related to this: where and whom can I tell
THANK YOU ? GOOD WORK ? For providing such a great OS.
There are many places, but I'm sure y
. But
all the guys on this mailing list probably already know this... Now, i
have one simple question related to this: where and whom can I tell
THANK YOU ? GOOD WORK ? For providing such a great OS.
Secondly: beeing miself an ex-gamer, I'm wondering if it is possible to
run Mac OS g
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for visiting our site, and for your interest in The Haunted Film.
Your inquiry has been forwarded to our Site Administrator, who will read and
respond to your message in a timely fashion. Please check in with our site as
often as possible, as we are still
Thank you Meijome,Valmont and all.
It work !!!
Thank you thank you...
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what should I do?
look up how to fix it, it's FAQ. "recover root password" or something
like that. I'm pretty certain it's in that wonder
Thank you for contacting the Astraware Newsletter Administration Team.
If you are requesting to be unsubscribed, this will normally be actioned before
our next newsletter is sent out. Please allow 24 to 48 hours for unsubscribe
requests to take effect.
If you have another question regarding
http://www.myclassics.com
You e-mail is very important to us at MyClassics.com and we appreciate your
taking time to e-mail us.
Due to the large amount of e-mail we receive, our staff will review your e-mail
shortly.
Once again, Thank You!
MyClassics.com Staff
In a message dated 1/14/05 7:07:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Why doesn't someone just answer the question? When Watson finally
>> admitted publically that 5.x has networking issues it ended the last
>> discussion. Just answer the question.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why doesn't someone just answer the question? When Watson finally
admitted publically that 5.x has networking issues it ended the last
discussion. Just answer the question.
Focusing on one cludge is meaningless - who cares if your network is a
little slow, or just slower
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 05:36:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 1/14/05 2:05:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >It's too bad he's now choosing to be even more antisocial
> >by changing his email address to avoid the procmail filters of those
> >for
In a message dated 1/14/05 2:05:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>It's too bad he's now choosing to be even more antisocial
>by changing his email address to avoid the procmail filters of those
>for whom his rantings have lost their amusementKris
No, I've changed my address
In a message dated 1/14/05 1:54:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> So your claim that its a "heavy-duty server" platform is tainted by the
>> fact that in order to use the fastest server Mobos, you have to use the
>> slower,
>> still-under-development 5.x. Which seems
In a message dated 1/14/05 1:46:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
On Jan 14, 2005, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The entire point of this extended discussion, for those who have paid
>> attention, is that FreeBSD 4.x, which is admittedly the fastest version
>> avail
Paul Schmehl writes:
PS> Not to pick a nit...well, ok...to pick a nit...developers do not
PS> support systems. Support organizations do. If you're going to be
PS> using FreeBSD in a corporate environment then you need to find a
PS> good *support* company that can backstop your local admins. *Then*
--On Friday, January 14, 2005 10:32:08 PM +0100 Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is, IMO, the single greatest obstacles to using FreeBSD in
corporate and mission-critical environments, and it's the main reason
why I'd be extremely hesitant about recommending FreeBSD in such
enviro
Len Zettel writes:
LZ> Better to expend resources on making 5.3 faster than 4.10 on all
LZ> chipsets or retrofit 4.10 to the new ones?
New OS versions should always provide either better functionality with
the same performance, or better performance with the same functionality.
Ideally they'd pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fac> The entire point of this extended discussion, for those who have
Fac> paid attention, is that FreeBSD 4.x, which is admittedly the
Fac> fastest version available, DOES NOT work with intel's fastest CPUs
Fac> because it doesnt support the necessary chipsets ...
While
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-freebsd->[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Thank you!
>
>In a message dated 1/13/05
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The entire point of this extended discussion, for those who have paid
attention, is that FreeBSD 4.x, which is admittedly the fastest version
available, DOES NOT work with intel's fastest CPUs because it doesnt
support the necessary chipsets, AND, that freebsd "people" woul
>
> ... Much misc drivel excised.
>
> > > rather ridicule people that ask why than fix things.
> > >
> > > So your claim that its a "heavy-duty server" platform is tainted by the
> > > fact that in order to use the fastest server Mobos, you have to use the
> > > slower,
> > > still-under-developm
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't know what you're talking about Jerry (as usual), so
why make comments when you never seem to understand the context?
He asked a question and the response was "why dont you donate your
hardware to a freebsd developer".
What's "juvenile" i
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:05:40PM +, Len Zettel wrote:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 05:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In a message dated 1/13/05 11:27:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
> > BS
> In a message dated 1/13/05 9:05:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Someone who begins with their first post on the questions list with
> >invective and insults instead of asking a question will, not surprisingly,
> >not receive much positive response. People here are i
That always cheerful and bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So your claim that its a "heavy-duty server" platform is tainted by the
fact that in order to use the fastest server Mobos, you have to use the
slower,
still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
that is tr
>
> In a message dated 1/13/05 11:27:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
> BS> that need support for the latest hardware.
>
> >It's not a question of latest, it's a question of which hardware.
> >FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
Not necessarily. The interesting ques
On Jan 14, 2005, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The entire point of this extended discussion, for those who have paid
attention, is that FreeBSD 4.x, which is admittedly the fastest version
available, DOES NOT work with intel's fastest CPUs because it doesnt
support the necessary chipsets,
L
In a message dated 1/13/05 9:05:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Someone who begins with their first post on the questions list with
>invective and insults instead of asking a question will, not surprisingly,
>not receive much positive response. People here are interested
In a message dated 1/14/05 8:12:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> People on the FreeBSD and Debian GNU/Linux mailing lists are very
> kind and help you in any case, if you ask questions politely and you
> have searched and read tha manuals first.
> So, why do we start always
In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>> still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
>> that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
>
>Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed
On Friday 14 January 2005 05:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 1/13/05 11:27:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
> BS> that need support for the latest hardware.
>
> >It's not a question
In a message dated 1/13/05 11:27:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
BS> that need support for the latest hardware.
>It's not a question of latest, it's a question of which hardware.
>FreeBSD, like all operat
Ramiro Aceves writes:
RA> I do not like to start wars among free OSes, I enjoy fighting the
RA> Bill OSes.
There are plenty of challenging video games on the market if you like to
fight.
RA> For me, making the war against Bill OSes means using Free Software
RA> OSes (Debian, Gentoo, FreeBSD.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, lord grinny wrote:
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ramiro Aceves writes:
RA> So, why do we start always the war? The real war
should be against the
RA> Bill Gates OSes, instead of fighting among us.
Professionals and serious amateurs in IT never wage
"wars" at all.
Don't they?? Then
OK we get it you don't like freeBSD.
Now shut up and quit wasting everyones bandwidth
On Jan 13, 2005, at 7:40 PM, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
me.
Boris
martin hudec wrote:
MH> Hello,
MH>
MH> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:13:04PM +0100 or thereabouts, RA>>miro
Aceves wrote:
MH>
RA>>If you argue that, you do not know Linux well. When I speak about
Linux,
RA>>I mean Debian or Gentoo. I do not think that they are chaothic or
RA>>intended for desktop. D
vs GPL license
> Linux vs xBSD
> GNOME vs KDE
> bash vs tcsh
> text apps vs X apps
> CUPS vs lpr
Did you forget Linux vs Gnu Linux? ;-)
>
> I think we should cooperate instead of fighting. Indeed, BSD code is
> on Linux OSes, and GNU software is on FreeBSD
On Friday 14 January 2005 06:43 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> lord grinny writes:
>
> lg> Don't they?? Then what are all the law suits about?
>
> Business.
I respectfully disagree. Business is people. People who do business
well abhor lawsuits.
"Lawyers are like nuclear missiles -- they have
On 2005-01-14 13:34, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ramiro Aceves writes:
>> So, why do we start always the war? The real war should be against the
>> Bill Gates OSes, instead of fighting among us.
>
> Professionals and serious amateurs in IT never wage "wars" at all.
Well said.
__
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:41:03AM -0800 or thereabouts, lord grinny wrote:
> Don't they?? Then what are all the law suits about?
Simple, dear Watson. About human stupidity and greed.
Cheers,
Martin
--
martin hudec
* 421 907 303 393
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* http://
lord grinny writes:
lg> Don't they?? Then what are all the law suits about?
Business.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>Ramiro Aceves writes:
>
>RA> So, why do we start always the war? The real war
should be against the
>RA> Bill Gates OSes, instead of fighting among us.
>
>Professionals and serious amateurs in IT never wage
"wars" at all.
>
>
>
Don't they?? Then what are all the law sui
Ramiro Aceves writes:
RA> So, why do we start always the war? The real war should be against the
RA> Bill Gates OSes, instead of fighting among us.
Professionals and serious amateurs in IT never wage "wars" at all.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@f
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:13:04PM +0100 or thereabouts, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> If you argue that, you do not know Linux well. When I speak about Linux,
> I mean Debian or Gentoo. I do not think that they are chaothic or
> intended for desktop. Debian put all the pieces together in one OS
instead of fighting. Indeed, BSD code is on
Linux OSes, and GNU software is on FreeBSD ports.. etc...
Thank you very much and sorry for my bad english.
Just my 2 euro cents.
FWIW I share your sentiments. FreeBSD absolutely rocks IMO, but so does
OpenBSD and Gentoo. I use all three in areas I&#x
, BSD code is on
Linux OSes, and GNU software is on FreeBSD ports.. etc...
Thank you very much and sorry for my bad english.
Just my 2 euro cents.
Ramiro Aceves. (Spain)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Boris Spirialitious writes:
BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
BS> that need support for the latest hardware.
It's not a question of latest, it's a question of which hardware.
FreeBSD, like all operating systems, targets a broad but not universal
user base, and
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Tabor Kelly wrote:
Boris Spirialitious wrote:
It's like Dave Horsfall wrote:
_
/| /| | | |
||__|| | |Please do not|
/ O O\__ | feed the
Boris Spirialitious wrote:
Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
me.
Boris
Personally I moved away from Linux because of all the support problems
it had, I've learned more about UNIX from the
Boris Spirialitious wrote:
It's like Dave Horsfall wrote:
_
/| /| | | |
||__|| | |Please do not|
/ O O\__ | feed the |
/
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
me.
Thought you decided to leave.
That's why I said 'Bye'
Someone who begins with their first post on the questions list with
>
> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
> that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
> me.
Thought you decided to leave.
That's why I said 'Bye'
Someone who begins with their first post on the questions list
Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
me.
Boris
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> t
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Boris Spirialitious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I
> report a small problem and they work hard to f
On Jan 13 at 09:57, Boris Spirialitious vomited up some 1's and 0's
thusly:
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
> a small problem and they work hard to fix it.
On 13/01/05 09:57 -0800, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
> a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebsd do they
> make
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:57:49AM -0800 or thereabouts, Boris Spirialitious
wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
> a small problem and they work hard to fi
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebsd do they
make fun of me or ask me to give
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:57:49AM -0800, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
> a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebs
>
> I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
> to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
> a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebsd do they
> make fun of me or ask me to give them hardware.
I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebsd do they
make fun of me or ask me to give them hardware. Its like a real product
this
. Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> natd_interface="aue0"
> this should be your external (ADSL) interface
Yes, I tried this one and it worked...
To all of you who responded, Thank you very very...much
natd_interface="aue0"
was what made my system enables my Internet Connect
Today I had a Mac OSX come my way for a simple application installation
of Thunderbird.
Unbeknownst to me, I interupted a system update that was in progress
(Kernel + others) and proceded to install Thunderbird. When the iBook
was rebooted it wouldnt load its GUI.
Thanks to the FreeBSD knowled
Dear Reader,
Your "Surfing the Net with Kids" newsletter subscription is now confirmed.
Thank you!
And you don't even have to wait until Wednesday morning for your first issue,
because I've put the current issue online at:
http://www.surfnetkids.com/newsletter.htm
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 07:57 pm, Ara Avvali wrote:
> I would love to send a big hug to people who helped me here about my
> question regarding the update process
> everything is fine now :-D
> love you all
> lol ;-)
Welcome to FreeBSD and the FreeBSD community.
Enjoy.
:-)
I would love to send a big hug to people who helped me here about my
question regarding the update process
everything is fine now :-D
love you all
lol ;-)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
for excellent user support. now i have enough answers and can start
working tomorrow :)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi, this is Terence's spam blocker. Apparently this is the first time he's getting
email from this reply-to email address. Just follow the link and answer the simple
question to verify you are a human not a spam-bot and I'll get the message. [was
getting 1000 spam a day; now, zippo!].
Thanks
Thank you for writing to AllCommunity.com, the Internet's Super Community!
We are currently swamped with emails and will get back to you as soon as
possible as your email and input is very important to us.
Some of our most frequently asked questions are listed here, so if you
find your a
>
> Sorry for being such a pest, my boss kept asking why my computer wasn't
> working, and I'm not ready to ready for him to know I've got BSD loaded.
> I was in panic mode because I couldn't get my Windows XP screens and
> applications to come up. I deeply apologize, I was finally able to read
>
Sorry for being such a pest, my boss kept asking why my computer wasn't
working, and I'm not ready to ready for him to know I've got BSD loaded.
I was in panic mode because I couldn't get my Windows XP screens and
applications to come up. I deeply apologize, I was finally able to read
all of your m
> Curious, what if I want either option. In other words, when I boot up the
> machine it shows the gdm login, but if I want a console login can I just hit
> Alt-F2?
Yes. ALT+Fn, n=1, ... 8 will give you virtual terminals, ALT+F9 brings
you back to X.
The virtual terminals are defined in /etc/tty
Curious, what if I want either option. In other words, when I boot up
the
machine it shows the gdm login, but if I want a console login can I just
hit
Alt-F2?
I would just try it out myself, but currently my only running FreeBSD
machine is a fileserver.
You'll have to hit Ctrl + Alt + F2 to get
> > > I searched your site, but my burning question is, How
> > > do I start the Graphical Interfaces, KDE and Gnome? I
> > > did a Custom Installation following the directions of
> > > the website. I installed all the packages and Ports. I
> > > want to learn everything.
> >
> > I don't know abou
> > I searched your site, but my burning question is, How
> > do I start the Graphical Interfaces, KDE and Gnome? I
> > did a Custom Installation following the directions of
> > the website. I installed all the packages and Ports. I
> > want to learn everything.
>
> I don't know about gnome but fo
Khoi - San Zulu wrote:
I am of the understanding that the Operating System
loves command line. I dont feel that I am at that
level yet to configure from the command line.
Make sure you read the "New to Unix" guide on
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/new-users/index.html
and y
On Thursday 22 January 2004 09:44, Khoi - San Zulu wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I would like to extend to you, whomever you are, my
> heartfelt gratitude for this operating system.
>
> I come from a poor community in the heart of South
> Africa. I learned about computers and how they work,
> using Micros
ed into 1 ( well 2 disks!).
>
> Please help in this regard. If possible, please help
> me with the commands or where I can find them!!! I
> would appreciate this greatly
>
> Thank You so much for this Operating. Please pass this
> on to whomever is concerned. My c
ing I get
multiple Operating Systems, with Multiple capabilities
all roled into 1 ( well 2 disks!).
Please help in this regard. If possible, please help
me with the commands or where I can find them!!! I
would appreciate this greatly!!!!
Thank You so much for this Operating. Please pass
Hello everyone,
I have a strange problem,
There is a users has been added in my FreeBSD 4.8-R since over 6 months
now.
suddenly from no where, last 2 days, any INCOMING emails ONLY
to this users it fails and it says "user known"
Actually the user is in the system, im runnin
Extreme Technologies, Inc. has two positions that we are actively recruiting
for on behalf of a client (Fortune 500 company w/ approx. 6000 employees
located in Houston, Texas). These are both high profile and Full Time
Employee roles within the organization.
Details on Environment
Sun Solaris
DavidB wrote:
First I would like to say that FreeBSD rocks, and have been using it
for more than a few years. I like the ports system, I like compiling
from source so I can get the compile time features I want.
Portupgrade really helps with maintaining ports.
My question is this, I would li
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:58:14 -0800
andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Supra-Debians"
> ---
> There are a number of Debian-based distros that will install a complete
> system ready to go as a workstation, server, etc., but that can be
> administered from there just like any other
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 00:20, DavidB wrote:
> My question is this, I would like to have a little exposure to linux and
> am wondering which distro to run, I used redhat back at the same time I
> started with FreeBSD3~ , not sure if I should check them out.
My personal favorite distro is Mandrake-
Hi all,
Debian gets my vote.
Hear, hear.
Anybody tried Crux (http://www.crux.nu/) BTW? It has a ports system.
Will try soon, methinks... Nico
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscrib
Gentoo. Period :)
I started out with slackware about 7 years ago, ran it for 2 years, then
ran freebsd for 5ish, but i wanted something with a bit more "main
stream/weird hardware/software" support so i decided to give a Linux a
try.
I must say that Gentoo is probably one of the most pleasurable
On Tuesday 04 Nov 2003 12:29, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, DavidB wrote:
> > My question is this, I would like to have a little exposure to linux
> > and
am wondering which distro to run, I used redhat back at the same
> > time I started with FreeBSD3~ , not sure if I should c
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
