[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.


Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet.
Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on
its fastest supported chipset?


----
Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek?


so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats
quite a selling point!



Is that you [EMAIL PROTECTED], whats TM for btw, Troll Master? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to