[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet.
Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on
its fastest supported chipset?
----
Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on
a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek?
so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats
quite a selling point!
Is that you [EMAIL PROTECTED], whats TM for btw, Troll Master?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"