Re: feature request for portmaster: check for permissions on --check-depends and friends

On 04/26/10 14:13, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Monday 26 April 2010 21:50:39 Doug Barton wrote: >>> ...the "-n" flag would be more appropriate. >> >> It only applies to builds/upgrades. > > and my suggestion would have been: "extend it to other pa

Re: portmaster, renamed ports, and DEPRECATED

On 04/19/10 11:01, Doug Barton wrote: > On 4/19/2010 9:52 AM, Greg Larkin wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> I just tried to upgrade from math/libgmp4 to math/gmp after refreshing >> my ports tree. math/gmp has superseded math/libgmp4, so I used >> portmaster's -o op

Re: portmaster 2.23, missing ORGIN

On 05/01/10 05:12, Jakub Lach wrote: > > Hello. > > Since upgrade to 2.23 portmaster is complaining > about ORGIN e.g. > > > $ portmaster --check-port-dbdir > > ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db/+CONTENTS > > Is this expected behaviour? Nope, but the good news is that it's harmless.

Re: portmaster 2.23, missing ORGIN

On 05/01/10 13:42, Jakub Lach wrote: > > > > Peter Jeremy-6 wrote: >> >> >> Have you switched from portupgrade and not deleted the associated metadata >> files? You should not have a port named pkgdb.db so it is not surprising >> that /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db/+CONTENTS would not have an ORIGIN. >>

Grandfather dependencies completely out of control

Howdy, I'm looking at the use of portmaster to upgrade perl versions, and noticed that there are a ton of ports listed as dependent on perl that don't have any use for it, including one of mine: qbittorrent-2.2.6 >> libnotify-0.4.5_3 >> atk-1.28.0 >> gio-fam-backend-2.22.4 >> gamin-0.1.10_3 >> gl

Re: Grandfather dependencies completely out of control

On 05/02/10 03:21, Koop Mast wrote: > One of the scripts provided by devel/glib20 is a perl script. That is the > reason why > we need perl. Thanks for the response, couple things come to mind. First, how many things actually make use of those perl/python scripts? If the number is small they sh

Re: [HEADS UP] Xorg 7.5 merge comming tomorrow.

On 05/02/10 13:17, David Wolfskill wrote: > The CVS mirror I use apparently didn't get the Xorg 7.5 updates as of my > daily update yesterday, but I seem to have the updates today, so I tried > using portmaster -- largely with good success. That's good news. :) > Save for points when the wireless

Re: Grandfather dependencies completely out of control

On 05/02/10 15:28, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On 5/2/10 5:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 05/02/10 03:21, Koop Mast wrote: >>> One of the scripts provided by devel/glib20 is a perl script. That is the >>> reason why >>> we need perl. >> >> Tha

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 5/4/2010 3:09 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > portmaster.rc > > # Always delete stale distfiles without prompting (-d) > ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt > > # Only install packages (-PP or --packages-only) > PM_PACKAGES=only > > # Use the INDEX file instead of /usr/ports (--index-only) > PM_INDEX

Re: portmaster stopped finding dependent ports if non-standard PORTSDIR

On 5/5/2010 6:58 PM, John Marshall wrote: > Yesterday I updated ports on my notebook (8.0-RELEASE-p2), took a deep > breath, used portmaster to upgrade xorg to 7.5 (portmaster -D xorg-7.4_4) > - ran without a hitch. > > Then, I upgraded portmaster (portmaster -D portmaster) - also no > problems.

Re: bug: portmaster installing build-only deps when upgrading with packages

You specified -t (twice). Does the behavior that you're concerned about continue to happen if you eliminate that option? Doug On 05/06/10 00:30, Christer Solskogen wrote: > portmaster is installing build-only dep when I upgrade my system with packages > > command: portmaster -avt -P > > /usr/

Re: bug: portmaster installing build-only deps when upgrading with packages

On 05/06/10 00:49, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Christer Solskogen > wrote: >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> You specified -t (twice). Does the behavior that you're concerned about >>> continue to

Re: portmaster stopped finding dependent ports if non-standard PORTSDIR

On 05/06/10 04:36, John Marshall wrote: >> So a couple of questions. What does: >> make BEFOREPORTMK=bpm -f/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V PORTSDIR > > /build/ports > >> return? And do you have an actual /usr/ports directory on the box where >> PORTSDIR is supposed to be /build/ports? If the answer

Re: UPDATING entry for X.org changes

use portmaster you can just run 'portmaster -af' or follow the > instructions near the end of its manual page (before Doug Barton > goes correcting me ;) ) Well since you asked ... :) The -f is not necessary there, -a is sufficient. In fact if you wanted to do things more increme

Re: Wrong path in portmaster man page for saved libraries

On 05/10/10 06:40, Denny Lin wrote: > Hi, the path listed for shared libraries on the portmaster man page > seems to be wrong. It should be /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ instead of > /usr/local/compat/pkg. Well that's embarrassing! (although not as embarrassing as if the 'rm -r' example had it wrong)

Re: Dixit port bad management

On 05/06/10 23:27, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Compared to the major Linux distros, you might want to keep one thing > in mind: we are not backed-up by a commercial entity that pays for our > work and for the hardware to do the work on. Indeed, I am not aware of > any ports committer hired by someon

UPDATING entry for phonon ports

Dima, In 1.921 you suggested the following: portmaster -o multimedia/qt4-phonon multimedia/phonon portmaster -o multimedia/qt4-phonon-gst multimedia/phonon-gstreamer But I'm confused. I have qt4-phonon-4.6.1_1 and qt4-phonon-gst-4.6.1_1 installed currently, but those ports are marked IGNORE.

Re: [kde-freebsd] UPDATING entry for phonon ports

On 05/11/10 15:16, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:01:44 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: >> That should read instead: >> >> portmaster -o multimedia/phonon multimedia/qt4-phonon >> portmaster -o multimedia/phonon-gstreamer multimedia/qt4-phonon-gst >> >> Rusty Nejdl > > Fixed, thank

Re: graphics/libchamplain build failure (libpng.so.5 not found)

On 05/15/10 11:49, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > My system is 8-STABLE i386 (after successful png/xorg/gnome update). PNG > version is png-1.4.1_1. Library installed is libpng.so.6. Does anybody > have a clue why it tries to pick up old library? It's likely something else that it's trying to link

Re: graphics/libchamplain build failure (libpng.so.5 not found)

On 5/15/2010 8:56 PM, Christer Edwards wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Jason wrote: >> I ran into this as well, and after completely removing libchamplain, and >> doing a rebuild on all libraries needing png, this port installed with no >> issue and built against libpng.so.6, as expected

Re: graphics/libchamplain build failure (libpng.so.5 not found)

On 5/15/2010 11:25 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > I'm just followed gnome update procedure and then portmaster -af. I seriously do not recommend that people do this. In very simple situations it _can_ work, but the problems outweigh the benefits most of the time. The situation you're describin

Dependency change for x11-toolkits/py-gtk2 to py-numpy

Howdy, In reference to the following: revision 1.107 date: 2010/05/16 22:07:20; author: kwm; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 Correct depend on Numpy instead of Numeric. PR: ports/146601 Submitted by: Martin Tournoij I have the following list of things that will need to be built in or

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 05/16/10 20:35, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 5/05/10 1:54 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >> Is there an apache-2.2.13 package in packages/All? And what do the links >> in packages/www and packages/Latest refer to? > > I did some more digging in the script itself. You hav

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 05/16/10 23:14, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > Perhaps I've confused the threads. But this issue appears to be a simple > one: I've installed the www/apache22 port but with certain settings it > installs the package called apache-worker. And with the index-only > option, it thinks it can see 2.2.

Re: Dependency change for x11-toolkits/py-gtk2 to py-numpy

On 05/17/10 03:08, Koop Mast wrote: > > Done. Yeah it excessive, I noticed it on QAT by chance. It is a optional > dependancy now. Works perfectly, thank you for the quick response. :) Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerh

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 05/17/10 00:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 17/05/10 4:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The INDEX has to be generated with the same settings as the packages >> were created with. > > Well, before we tried to run portsnap to update it, we also just copied > /usr/por

Re: preferred place for system-wide config files

On 5/18/2010 12:57 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:50:07PM +0400, Anonymous wrote: > >> This still doesn't clarify where to look for files that are *not* >> installed, e.g. config files. Such files can be created by user and only >> used by the port itself when they exist. Do

Re: preferred place for system-wide config files

On 5/18/2010 2:57 PM, Anonymous wrote: > Wesley Shields writes: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:21:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>> In the world where PREFIX and LOCALBASE are different, PREFIX cannot be >>> relied on to exist after the port is installed. Therefo

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster does not have zsh completions anymore ?

On 05/19/10 09:37, David DEMELIER wrote: > Hi, > > Today I upgraded the portmaster port to 2.27 and I noticed that there > was no completion anymore with my zsh. I was using it like portmaster > - where tab gave me all the options available, I was able to do > portmaster to use portsdir pattern t

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster does not have zsh completions anymore ?

The user reports in private e-mail that the completions file is installed, but it's still not working. Can a zsh user help him out? Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Inter

Re: GPLv3-licensed ports

On 05/19/10 12:26, Eitan Adler wrote: Is ports/LEGAL prominent enough? Should I also add something to the pkg-descr? I'd rather not. I remember some work about adding licensing support to the ports framework but can't seem to find it now. Perhaps tools like portmaster or portupgrade could be m

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster does not have zsh completions anymore ?

On 05/19/10 14:00, David DEMELIER wrote: mark...@melon ~ $ sudo portmaster - Try just: portmaster - Also, see the portmaster man page about setting up PM_SU_CMD. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster does not have zsh completions anymore ?

On 05/19/10 14:05, David DEMELIER wrote: I tested with a empty .zshrc and it works. Sorry for the noise. No worries, glad it worked out for you. :) -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness o

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 05/19/10 17:19, Jurgen Weber wrote: Dough Ah, I see. That looks to have worked correctly. Excellent! -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a dom

Re: Problem with apr1 that could be shared with libX11 and libSM that I have reported previously.

On 5/20/2010 12:24 PM, eculp wrote: I used postmaster and the results for trying to builds apr1 can be seen at http://www.vitalagua.mx//apr1.txt To me it seems to be related to configuration versions of tools like automake and autoconf but I can't find it. This doesn't look like a portmaster p

Re: Problem with apr1 that could be shared with libX11 and libSM that I have reported previously.

On 5/20/2010 4:32 PM, eculp wrote: Quoting Doug Barton : On 5/20/2010 12:24 PM, eculp wrote: I used postmaster and the results for trying to builds apr1 can be seen at http://www.vitalagua.mx//apr1.txt To me it seems to be related to configuration versions of tools like automake and autoconf

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On 5/19/2010 5:47 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 20/05/10 10:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/19/10 17:19, Jurgen Weber wrote: Dough Ah, I see. That looks to have worked correctly. Excellent! Hi Doug Can I suggest a note in the man page about this. For many users this is likely the

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

On 05/23/10 09:24, jhell wrote: That shouldn't actually be to hard. If a utility like the three main upgrade tools that are being used the most right now would export a variable for say "UPGRADING=yes" then the uninstall script could check against that to decide whether or not the port is being

Re: portmaster cannot find package

On Fri, 21 May 2010, Eitan Adler wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, I'll definitely consider that for the next version. I already have problems with the documentation being long and detailed, whether it is too much of either is sort of in the eye of the beholder. :) Detailed documentation is al

Re: issues unveiled by devel/gettext

On 06/02/10 05:23, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 02/06/2010 11:28, Yong-Jhen Hong wrote: What I do on this issue is: cd /usr/local/lib ln -s libintl.so.9 libintl.so.8 Really really a bad idea. This is never, ever necessary. Links are prone to be forgotten, this is why you add this kind of hack i

Re: issues unveiled by devel/gettext

On 06/02/10 21:29, Doug Barton wrote: A better suggestion would be to do this: mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg cd /usr/local/lib mv libgettextpo.so.4 and libintl.so.8 /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ Oy, sorry, didn't think that all the way through. Instead of 'mv' it should be

Re: devel/gettext further update

On 06/03/10 05:39, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 03.06.2010 13:30, schrieb Andrey Chernov: security/libksba security/libgcrypt (they use libgpg-error) So libgpg-error needs to be bumped, but why do things that don't like directly with gettext need it? One of the major benefits of shared librari

Re: devel/gettext further update

On 06/03/10 14:17, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:29:01AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/03/10 05:39, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 03.06.2010 13:30, schrieb Andrey Chernov: security/libksba security/libgcrypt (they use libgpg-error) So libgpg-error needs to be bumped, but

Re: Ccache warning

On 06/04/10 22:24, Denny Lin wrote: Hi, I saw this warning about devel/ccache a while ago: Any time you change CC/CXX you need to reinstall devel/libtool15 or you will run in to problems. This was added a long time ago, so I'm wondering if this is still necessary (should be devel/libtool22 now).

Re: PR not assigned yet

On 06/06/10 12:14, Helmut Schneider wrote: Hi, I created a PR 2 days ago but it is yet not assigned. Anything wrong with it? Yes. :) In order for the automated tools to work the category/name of the port in the synopsis needs to be exactly as it is in the ports tree. You had net-mgmt/net-sn

Re: Torrentflux and Zabbix Apache Include files??

On 06/06/10 07:20, Kaya Saman wrote: The only thing I don't get with FreeBSD ports is why there aren't template files for doing things like this, as people like me with not much experience in the FreeBSD world have to really struggle. So first of all, welcome to the FreeBSD world. :) By defaul

Re: portsnap5.FreeBSD.org outdated ?

On 06/06/10 15:05, Thomas Rasmussen wrote: Gentlemen, There are actual women involved in FreeBSD yaknow. :) Not sure this is the right place to write - it seems portsnap5 is outdated: I'm told by very reliable sources that this situation has been fixed. Thanks to you (and the others) who b

Re: Manually registering dependencies for ports

On 06/06/10 16:53, Thomas Rasmussen wrote: Hello, I've been wondering about something: When I write a script or webapp that needs some port to run, like a perl module, I install the needed port and life is good (tm). A year later when I've completely forgotten about the script I go do some sprin

Re: Manually registering dependencies for ports

On 06/06/10 17:16, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: When you install a script - let's call it xxx - that depends upon port yyy, you could do something like echo xxx >> /var/db/pkg/yyy/+REQUIRED_BY I think this would work. Please don't guess about stuff like this. If you're not _sure_ something

Re: Manually registering dependencies for ports

On 06/06/10 17:41, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Well, in my mind, when I sent the message, I was somewhat sure it would work, at least that it would pass some kind of quick test. In other words, you guessed, and your guess was wrong. FWIW, I had the same thought in mind when I got ready to

qt4-moc link failure

FYI, I'm using gcc 4.5.1, the binutils port, and I did reinstall libtool after gcc. I'm on -current from April (r207134), and rebuilding qmake worked fine. However the next qt4 port in line is qt4-moc, and it fails: g++ -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/tmp/usr/local/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-eve

Re: portmaster: problem with --packages-build?

On 06/11/10 10:52, Alberto Villa wrote: hi doug and list! while upgrading libogg and libao (portmaster -x virtualbox -Rr libogg libao) i've seen that some ports, which were already installed, got reinstalled with a package. they're build dependencies of a port which was upgraded, but they're also

Re: portmaster: problem with --packages-build?

On 06/11/10 15:56, Alberto Villa wrote: i would suggest just checking if the port is already installed That's not an adequate test because something could have been installed as a build dependency previously, which means it could safely be deleted with --delete-build-only. However, this is

Re: security/gorilla outdated

On 06/12/10 14:48, Charlie Kester wrote: Doing a little math, that means that 22.3% of all ports are unmaintained, but only 1.4% are both unmaintained and out-of-date. First number's not so good, but the second one is actually pretty impressive (especially considering the first). Thanks for co

Re: qt4-moc link failure

On 06/12/10 00:18, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/06/2010 03:40 Rob Farmer said the following: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Doug Barton wrote: Full log is at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/qt4-moc.log It looks like you compiled with g++45 but the very last command (the link) is using g

Re: portmaster: problem with --packages-build?

No hurry for testing, I found some good test cases locally and was able to confirm that the new code works to detect this problem so I committed it to the ports version (2.29). Thanks again for bringing this to my attention. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeat

Re: portmaster: problem with --packages-build?

On 06/12/10 17:10, Alberto Villa wrote: On Sunday 13 June 2010 01:40:19 Doug Barton wrote: No hurry for testing, I found some good test cases locally and was able to confirm that the new code works to detect this problem so I committed it to the ports version (2.29). i just saw the e-mail

Re: [kde-freebsd] qt4-moc link failure

On 06/13/10 07:30, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 13/06/2010 16:36 Max Brazhnikov said the following: qmake is designed to use special mkspecs for compilers. The only solution now is to create qmake mkspecs files for each compiler. Then switching between different compilers can be done via QMAKESPEC env

LICENSE questions

I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt I also have dns/fpdns which has this: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/LICENSE.txt which looks like i

Re: gnupg-2.0.14_3 + libassuan problem

On 06/14/10 02:30, Paul Macdonald wrote: Hi Is anyone else seeing problems with Upgrading 'gnupg-2.0.14_2' to 'gnupg-2.0.14_3' Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads

Re: gnupg-2.0.14_3 + libassuan problem

On 06/14/10 04:48, Matthew Seaman wrote: Even having replaced libassuan with libassuan-1, there still seems to be a problem for some ports: Yes, I fixed that shortly after the first update, thanks to QAT. :) I had tested picking up the new dependency for building the port, but didn't test fo

Re: LICENSE questions

On 06/14/10 08:05, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Doug Barton writes: [...] Then there is security/libassuan which seems to be dual licensed under GPLv3 and LGPLv2, did we ever decide how to handle that? In one of the dual-licensed port's Makefile, I added: #v+ LICENSE= GPLv3

Re: LICENSE questions

On 06/14/10 09:59, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote: I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt

lang/perl5.10 doesn't build with gcc 4.5.1

I've been experimenting with the idea of using gcc 4.5.1 as my "ports compiler" and ran into this problem: CCCMD = /usr/local/bin/gcc45 -DPERL_CORE -c -DAPPLLIB_EXP="/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/BSDPAN" -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-prote

Re: lang/perl5.10 doesn't build with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/19/10 08:25, b. f. wrote: lang/perl5.* fails with -fstack-protector in CFLAGS, when built with the base system compiler, on some architectures. I used the attached patch with the base system compiler and lang/perl5.10 on 9-CURRENT i386 to fix the problem. However, I never attempted to use

Re: Unable to update/build "security/gpa"

On 06/20/10 09:30, Jason E. Hale wrote: On Sunday, June 20, 2010 06:55:52 you wrote: FreeBSD-PRERELEASE 8.1 amd64 Since the release of "libassuan-2.0.0", I have not been able to update or reinstall "security/GPA". All of the other ports appear to build fine. Jerry, I'm sorry to hear that you

Re: lang/perl5.10 doesn't build with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/20/10 03:56, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Try adding '-lssp_nonshared' to the LDFLAGS. Thanks for the suggestion, but that didn't help. What did help is the attached patch, which doesn't fix, but does avoid the problem with trying to find libssp. With that patch the resulting perl passed all th

mail/thunderbird3 does not build with gcc 4.5.1

Howdy, On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with gcc 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerh

Re: lang/perl5.10 doesn't build with gcc 4.5.1

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote: This patch's logic is inverted: Doesn't matter, ports Makefile fu isn't going to get the job done to remove -fstack-protector, see my post tonight about this. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a dom

Re: mail/thunderbird3 does not build with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/21/10 23:25, b. f. wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with >> gcc 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at >> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt > > Before you embark on this cam

Re: mail/thunderbird3 does not build with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/22/10 00:46, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Sure :) This is on our TODO list: > http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/wiki/TODO > > But our man power is very limited and we'd like to cleanup/remove old > gecko ports and update libxul first. Awesome, thanks for replying! So far 3.0.5 compiled w

Re: Unable to update/build "security/gpa"

On 06/22/10 03:41, Jason E. Hale wrote: > On Monday, June 21, 2010 15:07:38 Doug Barton wrote: >> On 06/20/10 09:30, Jason E. Hale wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 20, 2010 06:55:52 you wrote: >>>> FreeBSD-PRERELEASE 8.1 amd64 >>>> >>>> Since

Re: New pkg-message[.in] guideline idea

On 06/23/10 07:46, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 06/23/10 14:40, Wesley Shields wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:16:07PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> Hi freebsd-ports@, >>> >>> I would like to propose you something that I would like to be done. >>> It's a cosmetic, useless thing but I like

Re: New pkg-message[.in] guideline idea

On 06/23/10 12:19, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 06/23/10 19:15, Doug Barton wrote: >>> I think we need 2 things: >>>> >>>> 1) All pkg-message whether .in or not go >>>>through the 'sed' that SUB_LIST/PLIST_SUB do. >> I li

Re: minidlna: a new port needs testers, start-up script

On 06/23/10 08:39, Mikhail T. wrote: > I need help with the start-up script > The way things usually work in an open source project is that you try it yourself first, then you send a message to the effect of, "I tried to d

Re: Call for testers: www/shellinabox (Shell in a Box)

On 06/24/10 15:51, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just finished my port of Shell in a Box: It's a secure web server > that provide ajax terminal emulator. > More information on the official website: > http://code.google.com/p/shellinabox/ > > Before to submit it, Can someone tes

devel/icu does not build with gcc 4.5.1

Howdy, Tried building devel/icu today with gcc 4.5.1 and it failed: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/tmp/usr/local/ports/devel/icu/work/icu/source/layoutex' generating dependency information for plruns.cpp generating dependency information for playout.cpp generating dependency information

devel/boost-python-libs compiled with gcc 4.5.1 causes link error

Howdy, I'm working on compiling the python bindings for net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar-15 and compiled devel/boost-python-libs as a dependency for that. When compiled with gcc 4.5.1 (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/custom-gcc/index.html) the boost-python-libs give the following l

Re: devel/icu does not build with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/26/10 17:15, Anonymous wrote: > It's already in gnats, ports/139652. So it is, thanks! I just committed that patch. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet prese

Re: devel/boost-python-libs compiled with gcc 4.5.1 causes link error

On 06/26/10 19:16, Anonymous wrote: > @@GLIBCXX_3.4.14 symbols are in gcc45/libstdc++.so. Try to add -lstdc++ > or use CXX otherwise it picks up libstdc++.so from /usr/lib. I have the following in /etc/libmap.conf: libgcc_s.so.1 gcc45/libgcc_s.so.1 libgomp.so.1gcc45/libgomp.so.1 libobjc.so.

Re: Early CONFLICTS detection is POLA viloation?

On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote: I would think that the CONFLICTS detection should only be a warning in the first run-through, and become a hard error when you try and run make install. I agree. FWIW, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with

Re: Early CONFLICTS detection is POLA viloation?

On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Freebsd-ports. I understand, that this change (ports/137855, bsd.port.mk:1.632) was made 6 months ago, but I've noticed it only now (twice in one day!). Am I only person, who thinks, that this change is HUGE POLA violation? PR

Re: devel/boost-python-libs compiled with gcc 4.5.1 causes link error

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Anonymous wrote: I've filed ports/148196. Looks nice, thanks! However, I think there should be a way to prepend search paths in /etc/rc.d/ldconfig despite possible footshooting. Using libmap.conf as described in custom-gcc article looks ugly to me. I tend to agree, alt

Re: tabstop setting for port Makefiles

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Chris Rees wrote: Dear All, From bsd.port.mk: [ch...@amnesiac]~% head /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk |tail -n 1 # Please view me with 4 column tabs! [ch...@amnesiac]~% However, the Porter's Handbook [1] says: Note that [bsd.port.mk] uses a non-standard tab setting. So if i

graphics/png does not compile with gcc 4.5.1

Tried doing the update today, but it failed: Full log at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/png-gcc451.log building static png library ranlib libpng.a building shared library libpng.so.6 /usr/local/bin/gcc45 -pipe -g -march=native -g -g -I. -g -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -L. -static -o pngtest

Re: graphics/png does not compile with gcc 4.5.1

On 06/29/10 19:27, Anonymous wrote: > Doug Barton writes: > >> Tried doing the update today, but it failed: >> >> Full log at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/png-gcc451.log > > Visibility and binding for that symbol are same here whether using > gcc45 or b

Re: graphics/png does not compile with gcc 4.5.1

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/29/10 19:27, Anonymous wrote: Doug Barton writes: Tried doing the update today, but it failed: Full log at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/png-gcc451.log Visibility and binding for that symbol are same here whether using gcc45 or basegcc

Re: graphics/png does not compile with gcc 4.5.1

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Doug Barton wrote: One more question. Is your gcc compiled with the LTO option? (/var/db/ports/gcc*/options will tell you.) I had that enabled (it's off by default) so I'm going to try recompiling gcc without it and see if it helps. Never mind, compiling witho

Re: graphics/png does not compile with gcc 4.5.1

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Anonymous wrote: Doug Barton writes: nm libssp.so.0 | grep __stack_chk_fail_local 0ac0 t __stack_chk_fail_local I'm not sure what FreeBSD version you're using -current, and I update just about every day. I tried upgrading -current with a clean /usr

Re: Redland compile error missing librdf

On 07/02/10 14:20, da...@vizion2000.net wrote: > Hi > Thank you in advance for any solutions > > There seems to be a problem with Redland. When building Soprano it reports > *Soprano components that will NOT be built: > *Redland storage backend (missing librdf/redland - http://librdf.org You keep

RE: Redland compile error missing librdf

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, David Southwell wrote: Make sure that your ports tree is up to date pkg_delete -f redland* raptor* soprano* kdelibs* cd /var/db/ports && rm -rf redland* raptor* soprano* kdelibs* cd /usr/ports/textproc/soprano && make clean && make install clean cd /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs4 &&

RE: Redland compile error missing librdf

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, da...@vizion2000.net wrote: I cc'd to you a post to the list 10 minutes before you wrote the above. Sorry if I missed that, your verbose communication style makes it difficult to follow what is going on. My posting included a link to a script ***script_link*** showing t

Re: meta port issue

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote: Hi Richard, On 7/8/10 4:26 PM, Richard E,. Neese wrote: Following is not happening I have a meta port of /usr/ports/net/freeswitch wich builds and installs other freeswitch ports of -core -sounds -music if you type make in the meta port it is not callin

Re: Review request for new port: sysutils/etcupdate

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote: This is a port for yet-another-/etc-merging tool that I wrote recently. It passes portlint -N with one bogus warning because /etc is in the comment. I didn't try installing/deinstalling but you seem to have the right stuff in the Makefile for that. Ove

Re: Review request for new port: sysutils/etcupdate

On 07/09/10 05:27, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:12:39 pm Doug Barton wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> This is a port for yet-another-/etc-merging tool that I wrote recently. > It >>> passes portlint -N with one

Re: Review request for new port: sysutils/etcupdate

On 07/09/10 05:27, John Baldwin wrote: > (I used etcmerge as a template.) BTW, I forgot to take this opportunity to insert my traditional rant about "this is why I'm so pedantic when it comes to removing bad code from existing ports." :) They get used as examples, and in this case John made a pe

Re: nvidia-driver 256.35 released

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Henrik Hudson wrote: On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Emanuel Haupt wrote: Nvidia released version 256.35 of their FreeBSD driver today: http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd-x86-256.35-driver.html http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd-x64-256.35-driver.html I just compiled the the 64

Re: dspam install

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, David DEMELIER wrote: I'm writing a brand new mail/dspam port from scratch, if I finally finish it in the next fews days I will show you. The only problem I have for now is that there is no WITH_CYRUS_VER like variable so I can't make a per-user defined variable for which cy

Re: Cant get new port Makefile to work

On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote: Given you already have the bits that download the script tarball etc., take a look at ports-mgmt/portmaster -- this installs a script, a manual page and optionally some other items. Plus it's by Doug Barton, so you can be pretty certain the po

Re: Cant get new port Makefile to work

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Joe wrote: Reviewed the portlint and portmaster port Makefiles and they both have the source files provided as part of the port. I have this method already working. Need to change to method where the source files have to be fetched from remote site. Looking for template

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >