staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has not been staged. It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? --- Makefile2014-05-31 21:58:23.0 -0700 +++ Makefile-staged 2014-06-03 00:34:03.0 -0700 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ MASTER_SITES= SF/heirloom/heirloom

[QAT] 355707: 2x depend (compiler_error in editors/emacs21), 4x ignored: incorrect 'uses+=tar:bizp2', 1x depend (??? in graphics/netpbm), 4x ignored: you should define tgtarch and tgtabi to build port

- Convert gmake, bzip2 to USES Approved by:portmgr - Build ID: 20140529151000-34746 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 5 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:35:09 GMT Revision:

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

from Perry Hutchison : > I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has > not been staged. > It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? Yes, you missed something. mail/heirloom-mailx has been supsrseded by Steffen Daode Nurpmeso's S-nail. I haven't tried that yet, bu

[QAT] 355737: 4x leftovers

Fix build on 11-CURRENT (was otherwise failing due to using utmp instead of utmpx). Approved by:portmgr (bdrewery) - Build ID: 20140529194800-4149 Job owner: nwhiteh...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 5

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 2014-06-03 11:05, David Chisnall wrote: We are pleased to announce that the FreeBSD project has begin the transition from the GNATS bug-tracking system to Bugzilla. The Bugzilla installation can be found here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ It doesn't seem to be possible to post commen

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without creating an > account and logging in. That is correct. The current leaning is towards not providing such functionality as: - It makes spamming easy - If someone can't be bother

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 2014-06-03 15:16, David Chisnall wrote: On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without creating an account and logging in. That is correct. The current leaning is towards not providing such functionality as: - It makes sp

Re: roundcube's switch to composer, anything plugin port maintainers should be doing?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Bethke ha scritto: > I was in the process of upgrading a roundcube plugin (sauserprefs) > and noticed that roundcube is switching/has swichted to composer. > This is the first time I’ve come across composer. Should I ignore > that for the moment

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 6/3/2014 14:41, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Anything that would allow me to participate without using an account > would be very much appreciated. Why? You've already spent more energy protesting than it would have taken create an account. I have a feeling I'm going to cringe at an honest answer

Re: drop maintainership of 6 ports

Hello, devel/fpp i would take this one. Till now i wrote just some patches for PHP based ports. Whats the next step? Writing a patch to change maintainer? Greetings, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

Hello, I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion. Following are result of my investigation: 1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault, while with svn: it never happens. 2. Segfault happens only when checking out. Running 'svn cleanup' and 's

Re: drop maintainership of 6 ports

Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >> devel/fpp > > Whats the next step? Writing a patch to change maintainer? In a nutshell: 1. Check upstream to see if there's no newer version. If there is, try to update the port. 2. Change MAINTAINER, indeed. 3. If you can, mirror the distfile and add your site t

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

On 3 Jun 2014, at 07:59, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello, > > I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with > devel/subversion. > > ... > > Does anyone experienced this? Yes, we are seeing the same thing, but a single cleanup doesn't always work for us. Sometimes we have to go th

Re: roundcube's switch to composer, anything plugin port maintainers should be doing?

Am 03.06.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Alex Dupre : > Signierter PGP Teil > Stefan Bethke ha scritto: > > I was in the process of upgrading a roundcube plugin (sauserprefs) > > and noticed that roundcube is switching/has swichted to composer. > > This is the first time I’ve come across composer. Should I

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

>> No comment-by-email too, as far as I can tell. > >This is probably going to reappear at some point, if there is sufficient >demand for it. yes, this is probably a good idea, bug-followup@ or similar. Also, will send-pr still work? Anton ___ freebs

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

From: Jim Riggs Subject: Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:15:50 -0500 > Yes, we are seeing the same thing, but a single cleanup doesn't always work > for us. Sometimes we have to go through several svn up-cleanup-up-cleanup-... > iteration

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

>On 6/3/2014 14:41, Vitaly Magerya wrote: >> Anything that would allow me to participate without using an account >> would be very much appreciated. > >Why? For me it's easier to mail to bug-followup@ and to use send-pr than via an html browser. Indeed, in many cases the failures are such that the

[QAT] 355805: 3x depend (distinfo_update in accessibility/atk), 1x leftovers

www/firefox-esr: explicitly use UNZIP_CMD This should have been included with a similar commit to www/firefox-i18n and www/seamonkey-i18n. Covered by general infrastructure blanket. - Build ID: 20140530092201-28827

Re: drop maintainership of 6 ports

A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: >> Whats the next step? Writing a patch to change maintainer? > > In a nutshell: [snip] Which reminds me: if this is the first time you're actually going to be a maintainer, there's a thread on the Forums that you may find useful: https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopi

[QAT] 355807: 4x leftovers

Stagify. - Build ID: 20140530092800-35273 Job owner: de...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 4 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:23:43 GMT Revision: 355807 Repository: https://

[QAT] 355802: 4x depend (distinfo_update in accessibility/atk), 2x leftovers, 2x success

www/firefox(seamonkey)-i18n: explicitly use UNZIP_CMD The extraction of xpi requires zip (infozip to be precise). Rather than use variables EXTRACT_CMD and EXTRACT_BEFORE_ARGS, use UNZIP_CMD and the default "-qo" arguments to future-proof these ports (depending on the implemention, the original v

[QAT] 355808: 4x leftovers

Stagify. - Build ID: 20140530092800-63872 Job owner: de...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 4 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:24:55 GMT Revision: 355808 Repository: https://

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 6/3/14, 5:16 AM, David Chisnall wrote: On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without creating an account and logging in. That is correct. The current leaning is towards not providing such functionality as: - It makes s

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

On 2014-06-03, Perry Hutchison wrote: > PLIST_FILES= bin/${PORTNAME} \ > + man/man1/${PORTNAME}.1 \ > "@unexec if cmp -s %D/etc/nail.rc %D/etc/nail.rc.default; then > ${RM} -f %D/etc/nail.rc; fi " \ > "etc/nail.rc.default" \ > "@exec [ -f %B

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:50:33 -0700 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I think a bunch of this can be solved by using oauth or something > like it. aka: login via github or facebook/twitter. Why not take it to the higher level, and force all FreeBSD users to replace /etc/master.passwd with Facebook login

graphics/inventor needs new maintainer

Hi @All! Back in 2003 I ported Open Inventor to FreeBSD. Now, almost 11 years later my spare time is rather limited. I've already stopped following -current two years ago (I'm using 9.2 right now) and neither I have the environment (no FreeBSD-current, no FreeBSD-10, no poudriere, ...) nor th

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > On 6/3/14, 5:16 AM, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: >> >>> It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without >>> creating an account and logging in. >> That is correct. The current leaning is towards not providing

[QAT] 355839: 4x leftovers

Staging support - Build ID: 20140530135200-45479 Job owner: ra...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 4 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:28:11 GMT Revision: 355839 Repository: h

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: Hello, I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion. Following are result of my investigation: 1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault, while with svn: it never happens. 2. Segfault happens only when

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Vitaly Magerya wrote: On 2014-06-03 11:05, David Chisnall wrote: We are pleased to announce that the FreeBSD project has begin the transition from the GNATS bug-tracking system to Bugzilla. The Bugzilla installation can be found here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ It doesn't seem to be

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Hi! > This is the first I have seen this GNATS to Bugzilla subject discussed. It was discussed on https://wiki.freebsd.org/Bugtracking since approx. 2004. > GNATS has been working just fine for many years, why the change to Bugzilla? See the wiki page for the details. > Who makes this kind o

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

> On Jun 3, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/14, 5:16 AM, David Chisnall wrote: On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without creating an account and logg

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 Jun 2014, at 16:18, Fbsd8 wrote: > This is the first I have seen this GNATS to Bugzilla subject discussed. Then you have not been paying attention to any discussions for the past few years. Here, for example, is the Bugmeister team's entry in the status report from Q1 2013: http://www.f

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

Am 03.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Warren Block: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with >> devel/subversion. >> >> Following are result of my investigation: >> >> 1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault,

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

Am 03.06.2014 17:09, schrieb Christian Weisgerber: > On 2014-06-03, Perry Hutchison wrote: > >> PLIST_FILES=bin/${PORTNAME} \ >> +man/man1/${PORTNAME}.1 \ >> "@unexec if cmp -s %D/etc/nail.rc %D/etc/nail.rc.default; then >> ${RM} -f %D/etc/nail.rc; fi " \ >>

[QAT] 355863: 4x leftovers

- Update to 1.6.923 - Add STAGE support PR: 190342 Submitted by: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623...@gmail.com> - Build ID: 20140530154800-24766 Job owner: w...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 4 d

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Le mar 3 jui 14 à 17:55:03 +0200, Alfred Perlstein écrivait : > I still think using a form of oauth might help. OpenID? Regards, -- Th. Thomas. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

2014-06-03 14:16 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall : > On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:09, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > > > It doesn't seem to be possible to post comments (or bugs) without > creating an account and logging in. > > That is correct. The current leaning is towards not providing such > functionality as: >

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 03/06/2014 13:16, David Chisnall wrote: Volunteers to be spam filters welcome... Here's one :) -- Regards, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org PGP Signature http://www.hayers.org/pgp "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 6/3/2014 18:57, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > 2014-06-03 14:16 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall : > > A mood point for me, as I'll need a full account, but the Project should > not make reporting bugs harder than it is already ... have you considered > using reCATPCHA or something to fend of at least some o

[QAT] 355878: 4x leftovers

Update math/R-cran-gss to 2.1-0. ChangeLog: * R: i) Tuned Newton iteration algorithms in ngreg and ngreg.proj. ii) Bug fixes in routines involving univariate minimization via nlm0. iii) Minor changes in makedata.x's. ---

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

> On 03 Jun 2014, at 19:11, John Marino wrote: > >> On 6/3/2014 18:57, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >> 2014-06-03 14:16 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall : >> >> A mood point for me, as I'll need a full account, but the Project should >> not make reporting bugs harder than it is already ... have you consider

Re: Citrix Ica Port Permissions Problem

I'm not sure, but it looks like citrix_ica requires the setupwfc to run, which it won't because it is on FreeBSD. When I run just the wfica client, it cannot find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0, which does already exist in /usr/local/lib. It seems like either it is not linking during the install, or it requir

Thanks!

Just a big thanks to all ports maintainers and helpful fellow mailing list participants. Without your prompt responses and voluntary activities we (at least I) can run a stable updated OS and programs. Keep up the good work! Jos Chrispijn _

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: > ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are > about to make a meaningful report... This is *not* the reason for registation. The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having a way to talk with the reporter drastically in

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:11:29AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > What about bug followups via email? That one won't be supported for a > bit as we get used to bugzilla. It certainly on the cards to support > in the future. I initially thought this would be a problem for me, but even in 24 hours of

databases/sqldeveloper: observations & questions

Hi. First off, a big thanks to who whoever ported this, it's a nice piece of software. I wanted to share some observations plus questions. * I have "JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_8". Although sqldeveloper complains on startup that max logical version is =1.8, my finding is th

[QAT] 355936: 4x leftovers

- Stage support [1] - Update to 2.4.0 [1] - Reset maintainer to ports@ PR: 190365 [1] Submitted by: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623...@gmail.com> [1] - Build ID: 20140531052600-25498 Job owner: w.

x11/xterm: no coloured prompt and characters after update (BLIND!)

After today's update of port x11/xterm from xterm-304 to xterm-305, the terminals I start on the desktop (windowmaker) do not show any coloured prompt or characters - they have the same colour as the background! Flying blind! This is somehow boring! The only way to get some coloured (and theref

Re: Firefox chokes up for several seconds... frequently

In message <51901.1401770...@server1.tristatelogic.com>, I wrote: > >I wrote: > >> Since I last updated my ports a couple of weeks ago, the problem >> has gotten DRAMATICALLY worse. Now Firefox is choking up frequently, >> and for perhaps 10-20 second each time, on virutally every web site >> th

A simple ports question

Functionally, what is the difference between: pkg_delete Y and: cd /usr/ports/X/Y; make deinstall ? P.S. Yes, yes. I know. I am _supposed_ to be only using pkgng, but if you are able to do so, please answer my question anyway. ___ freebsd

[QAT] 355935: 4x leftovers

- Stage support [1] - Reset maintainer to ports@ PR: 190358 [1] Submitted by: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623...@gmail.com> [1] - Build ID: 20140531052200-15986 Job owner: w...@freebsd.org Build

Re: A simple ports question

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:09:10PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > Functionally, what is the difference between: > >pkg_delete Y > > and: > >cd /usr/ports/X/Y; make deinstall > > ? > none regards, Bapt pgpkJnM6GHEvc.pgp Description: PGP signature

[QAT] 355947: 4x leftovers

* Support STAGE * Update to latest version: 1.1.3. Approved by:wg (mentor) - Build ID: 20140531084200-18678 Job owner: ale...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Perry Hutchison wrote: > I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has > not been staged. > > It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? > > --- Makefile2014-05-31 21:58:23.0 -0700 > +++ Makefile-staged 2014-06-03 00:34:03.

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Am 03.06.2014 14:09, schrieb Vitaly Magerya: > On 2014-06-03 11:05, David Chisnall wrote: >> We are pleased to announce that the FreeBSD project has begin the >> transition from the GNATS bug-tracking system to Bugzilla. The >> Bugzilla installation can be found here: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.or

Re: Firefox chokes up for several seconds... frequently

Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message <51901.1401770...@server1.tristatelogic.com>, I wrote: I wrote: Since I last updated my ports a couple of weeks ago, the problem has gotten DRAMATICALLY worse. Now Firefox is choking up frequently, and for perhaps 10-20 second each time, on virutally eve

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Matthias Andree wrote: Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who aren't the original reporter, but for the common case that the bug evolves into a discussion between a developer and a reporter having a valid BIDIRECTIONAL communications channel up front helps a lot.

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Matthias Andree wrote: >> Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who >> aren't the original reporter, but for the common case that the bug >> evolves into a discussion between a developer and a reporter having a >> valid BIDIRECTIO

x11/xcb program unusable after upgrading to latest ports

I have a problem with xcb since updating my ports. The program starts up ok but the frame where the data in the cut buffer is displayed is so tiny that any data placed into the cutbuffer can't be read. Is anyone else seeing this behavior? Note that I am now seeing this on both my 9.2-stable and 10

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 13:41, John Marino wrote: > On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: >> Matthias Andree wrote: >>> Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who >>> aren't the original reporter, but for the common case that the bug >>> evolves into a discussion between a devel

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:41, John Marino wrote: > >> On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: >> Matthias Andree wrote: >>> Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who >>> aren't the original reporter, but for the common case that the bug >>> evolves into a discussion bet

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 13:51, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:41, John Marino wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: >>> Matthias Andree wrote: Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who aren't the original reporter, but for the common

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:52, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> On 3 June 2014 13:51, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:41, John Marino wrote: > On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Matthias Andree wrote: > Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful commen

Re: A simple ports question

On 2014-06-03, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > Functionally, what is the difference between: >pkg_delete Y > and: >cd /usr/ports/X/Y; make deinstall > ? The latter calls the former. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de _

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

>On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: >> ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are >> about to make a meaningful report... > >This is *not* the reason for registation. > >The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having >a way to talk with the reporter drasti

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 14:40, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Will send-pr continue to work or not? >From the announce email === The send-pr script will continue functioning as a compatibility interface, but it is not guaranteed to run in a timely fashion (currently, importing bugs submitted via send-pr inv

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

>There are also other mechanisms. For example, mailing lists. We were repeatedly told in this list that the preferred way to let people know of the issue is to file a PR. Posting something to ports@ is the easiest route (for me, at least), however, I take the trouble to use the send-pr route. Reg

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

>Could bugzilla maybe allow email verified submissions without an account? So >you report a bug with your email address and have to click verify in an email >response to get it to a state people will look at it. That would eliminate the >whole "oh no, one more account/password" hassle, but reduc

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:52:36 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 June 2014 13:51, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > >> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:41, John Marino > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: > >>> Matthias Andree wrote: > Surely there may be valid and sometimes usefu

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 15:03, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>Could bugzilla maybe allow email verified submissions without an account? So >>you report a bug with your email address and have to click verify in an email >>response to get it to a state people will look at it. That would eliminate >>the whole

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 3 June 2014 14:58, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>There are also other mechanisms. For example, mailing lists. > > We were repeatedly told in this list that the preferred > way to let people know of the issue is to file a PR. > Posting something to ports@ is the easiest route (for me, at least),

[QAT] 356008: 4x leftovers, 20x success

Mark GKrellM 1.X as DEPRECATED. Approved by:portmgr (implicit) - Build ID: 20140531191401-59511 Job owner: u...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 days Enddate: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:52:53 GMT

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: > >> ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are >> about to make a meaningful report... >> > > This is *not* the reason for registation. > > The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having > a

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:59:54PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > Well, I didn't mean *via* email, but specifying a valid email address > in a web form. This could be done using the old web form on freebsd.org > and using an email verification loop Hmm. Well, I think we're really hoping to deorbi

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:50:23PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > > I don't concede killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting, > > but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on > > non-trivial bugs. > > Trivial bugs are important too. I'll echo eadler a bit here, but wit

Re: A simple ports question

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:15:15 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:09:10PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > > > > Functionally, what is the difference between: > > > >pkg_delete Y > > > > and: > > > >cd /usr/ports/X/Y; make deinstall > > > > ? > > > none

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

Hi, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: > > ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are > > about to make a meaningful report... > > This is *not* the reason for registation. > > The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having > a way t

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Hurd wrote: I would venture that docs bugs and certain classes of website bugs rarely have communications. For example: ... There are trivial bugs in any class, but it's a mistake to think that most of any particular class are that way. I do agree that some triv

LXQT desktop Question

I saw a new desktop project LXQT (http://lxqt.org/), porting it to FreeBSD Ports in the work is in progress it? Thank you -- Regards. By: Haowu Ge; PGP:B7C9977A WWW: https://www.7axu.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

[QAT] 356061: 91x success, 6x leftovers, 1x coredump, 1x threads, 1x arch, 1x ignored: doesn't build on 8.x, 31x depend (arch in graphics/sdl_gfx)

- Update graphics/sdl_gfx to version 2.0.25 - Bump PORTREVISION on ports depending on it, since the shlib version changed - Build ID: 20140601081200-65220 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 day

poudriere build failure

I've got poudriere building most of a set of ports with default settings, default jail, 8.4-RELEASE amd64 both host and target. However, it's failing on a couple at the fetch stage. For example, databases/db42, db42-4.2.52_5 fails to build devel/libtool. devel/libtool direct succeeds though!

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On 6/4/2014 02:34, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:50:23PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> I don't concede killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting, >>> but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on >>> non-trivial bugs. >> >> Trivial bugs are important