On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:52:36 -0700 Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 13:51, Michael Gmelin <gre...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On 03 Jun 2014, at 22:41, John Marino <freebsd.cont...@marino.st> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote: > >>> Matthias Andree wrote: > >>>> Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by > >>>> people who aren't the original reporter, but for the common case > >>>> that the bug evolves into a discussion between a developer and a > >>>> reporter having a valid BIDIRECTIONAL communications channel up > >>>> front helps a lot. > >>> > >>> I would venture that docs bugs and certain classes of website bugs > >>> rarely have communications. For example: > >>> > >>> Those bugs would simply not have been submitted if I had to > >>> create an account first. > >> > >> > >> If the submitter's interest in getting the bug known in order to be > >> fixed exceeds the distaste for registration, then yes, the report > >> would still get submitted. (For example, if that person *really* > >> wants to access FreeBSD forums via IPv6 and nobody knows it's > >> busted, they would probably bite the bullet). > >> > > > > Ah, is that the reason why I had so many issues with it lately? > > Duno. If you can, please file a bug and let us know :) > Yep, seems like IPv6 is broken. Got my bugzilla account working, but couldn't find the forums as a component. Opened a bug to get the component in so I can file a bug :) -- Michael Gmelin _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
