On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:22, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Konovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:01:17
+0200):
> > On Tuesday 15 August 2006 15:19, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:47:31 +0200
> > >
> > > Alexander Konovalenko <[EMAIL PROTEC
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Try to
# pkg_delete -f /var/db/pkg/autoconf* /var/db/pkg/automake* \
/var/db/pkg/libtool* /var/db/pkg/gnu-libtool*
Then reinstall port. The installations missed AM_PROG_LIBTOOL because
this macros is installed into /usr/local/share/aclocal which you removed.
So put
Hi,
I have a question about a ports upgrade method as mentioned in the
20060223 libtool entry in UPDATING.
The entry mentions :
...
Unfortunately, there is no simple upgrade path. Short of removing
all packages and reinstalling from scratch, the only other viable
alternative would be caref
Hi,
according to MSFT and RTR
http://www.rtr.com/fpsupport/
MSFT has EOLed the Frontpage-Server extensions for Unix.
What does that mean for the port?
I thought I had downloaded the latest version of the binaries, but it
seems I didn't...
Would somebody mind to send them to me?
cheers,
Rain
Hans Lambermont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about a ports upgrade method as mentioned in the
> 20060223 libtool entry in UPDATING.
>
> The entry mentions :
> ...
>
> I'm wondering what the 'careful use of' really means, more specifically
> what should one look out for when using the menti
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
--Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:55:35 -0500
B Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:r
Anyway, I have a question: Why are there two ports here that do the same=
=20
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:33:51 -0500
B Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> I've included errors and lists of packages in another post. Just to let
> you know, I changed the Makefile on line 19 BACK to what it was before
> it was changed on August 13:
>
> -USE_AUTOTOOLS= aclocal:19 automake:1
Mark Ovens wrote:
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Try to
# pkg_delete -f /var/db/pkg/autoconf* /var/db/pkg/automake* \
/var/db/pkg/libtool* /var/db/pkg/gnu-libtool*
Then reinstall port. The installations missed AM_PROG_LIBTOOL because
this macros is installed into /usr/local/share/aclocal which
I. Problems
There are few things that I don't like in freebsd ports:
1. Binary packages are almost useless
The chance to install all that you need using 'pkg_add -r' and some given
time are very low. Some packages are outdated, some of them was not
build because something of its dependencies fai
On 8/16/06, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
according to MSFT and RTR
http://www.rtr.com/fpsupport/
MSFT has EOLed the Frontpage-Server extensions for Unix.
What does that mean for the port?
I had contacted RTR before the FP extensions were EOL, to see if we
could Mirror the ext
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:45:58PM +1000, Alexander Logvinov wrote:
> In /ports/games/utserver/Makefile
>
> RUN_DEPENDS=
> ${LINUXBASE}/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/linux-sdl12
> BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS}
>
> Can I remove BUILD_DEPENDS?
Since the port doesn't build anythi
Greetings,
I'm not sure if this is the right place or not, but here goes. I just
cvsup'd my ports
collection from cvsup17.us.freebsd.org, and a lot of ports were moved back
by at least a day.
Can someone check it's health, or direct me to the right place (I've
already fixed it by using
c
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:40:54AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Greetings,
> I'm not sure if this is the right place or not, but here goes. I just
> cvsup'd my ports
> collection from cvsup17.us.freebsd.org, and a lot of ports were moved back
> by at least a day.
>
> Can someone check
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Greetings,
> I'm not sure if this is the right place or not, but here goes. I just
> cvsup'd my ports
> collection from cvsup17.us.freebsd.org, and a lot of ports were moved back
> by at least a day.
>
> Can someone check it's health, or direct me to the right plac
I'd like to propose a policy to enforce a change in
DIST_SUBDIR whenever a distfile is rerolled in-place, i.e.
when checksum changes, but name stays unchanged.
Moreover, effort should be made whenever possible to
make the old file available for download from an
alternative location.
This policy
Vanilla I. Shu wrote:
how about switch to textproc/pecl-ctemplate?
it's another php tempalte engine base on google ctemplate library,
and writen by me :)
Or you could try the popular Smarty http://smarty.php.net/ .
/usr/ports/www/smarty .
___
Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> I. Problems
>
> There are few things that I don't like in freebsd ports:
>
> 1. Binary packages are almost useless
>
> The chance to install all that you need using 'pkg_add -r' and some given
> time are very low. Some packages are outdated, some of them was not
> buil
Thanks for the pointers.
What I've discovered about the compile error for php-templates
is that the "bad" code is there as an aid to debugging memory issues.
That is, the zend code appears to depend on pre-processor behavior to
correctly embed the filename and line of the source code in the code
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:33:35PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> II Solutions
>
> Yeah, I'm going to talk about ports tree tagging again :-). So what I
> propose: having HEAD and STABLE (or whatever you want't to call it,
> so e.g. not to confuse with src/) branches. Committers commit all
>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:28:36PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I think someone (kuriyama?) was in fact already doing this, so getting
> the project started would not involve much work.
Yes, that was already set up, but does not appear to be active. I don't
know if the link was supposed to be br
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
> DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
> go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My preferred solution involves a coupl
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:33:35 +0400
Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I. Problems
>
> There are few things that I don't like in freebsd ports:
>
> 1. Binary packages are almost useless
>
> The chance to install all that you need using 'pkg_add -r' and some given
> time are very low.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My preferre
Hi folks,
sometimes good ideas come later, so please wait a bit with making your
ports DESTDIR-aware. Kris had a very interesting suggestion. I wonder
how we haven't thought of this so far. This needs a bit more of
discussion, though, but if we can work this out a bit better, things
will beco
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
> >>DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you deci
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many year
Kris Kennaway wrote at 13:36 -0400 on Aug 16, 2006:
> mount_nullfs ${PORTSDIR} ${DESTDIR}${PORTSDIR}
> mount_nullfs ${WRKDIR} ${DESTDIR}${WRKDIR}
> mount_devfs foo ${DESTDIR}/dev
> chroot ${DESTDIR} cd ${.CURDIR} && make install
>
> A suitable version of the above should allow all ports to b
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> >
> >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> The hard
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:35:22PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
> > >
> > >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at
* Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
> > DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
> > go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
>
> My preferred solution involves a couple of shel
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
> if we can work this out a bit better, my progress so far
> would become pointless...
Not at all! If I had a dollar for every Good Idea(TM) that I had which ended
up leading me down a completely different road, I'd be retired now. These
are not easy problems, and the fact t
* Doug Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > if we can work this out a bit better, my progress so far
> > would become pointless...
> Not at all! If I had a dollar for every Good Idea(TM) that I had which ended
> up leading me down a completely different road, I'd be retired now. These
> are not ea
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:20:09AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Both current and nullfs-drived DESTDIR implementations require all
> depends in the DESTDIR. But actually BUILD_DEPENDS from host can be
> used.
>
This should already be the case with the current implementation and also
will
Hi
It looks like the latest source package for phpMyAdmin (2.8.2.2) does
not appear on any of the ftp servers.
See below for output from portupgrade.
Thanks
Brett
[root]# portupgrade phpMyAdmin
---> Upgrading 'phpMyAdmin-2.8.2.1' to 'phpMyAdmin-2.8.2.2'
(databases/phpmyadmin)
---> Building '
Brett Schroeder wrote:
> Hi
>
> It looks like the latest source package for phpMyAdmin (2.8.2.2) does
> not appear on any of the ftp servers.
>
> See below for output from portupgrade.
>
> Thanks
>
> Brett
[ ... ]
> ===> Found saved configuration for phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.4
> => phpMyAdmin-2.8.2.
Hi, folks!
I'm, working on LegoBSD project
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/legobsd) - a simple by design,
modular, easy for configure and extension toolkit used for building
FreeBSD based operating systems for all sort of needs. The project idea
inspired by FreeSBIE (http://www.freesbie.o
Hi,
I am using qemu to emulate win2k on FreeBSB-6.1. I particularly wanted to run
some proprietary software requiring a dongle on the parallel port and made
the patch attached. It seems to work for me so I thought it might be useful
to others. (I haven't attempted to print anything but win2k in
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> And why is it that you always need to run the very latest version? Just
> pick the last package that was available. It's normally new enough.
Where have I said I need _lastest_ version of everything? You got it
totally wrong. I do not need lastest version of packages, I j
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:28:36PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I think someone (kuriyama?) was in fact already doing this, so getting
> > the project started would not involve much work.
>
> Yes, that was already set up, but does not appear to be active. I don't
> kno
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:33:35PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>
> > II Solutions
> >
> > Yeah, I'm going to talk about ports tree tagging again :-). So what I
> > propose: having HEAD and STABLE (or whatever you want't to call it,
> > so e.g. not to confuse with sr
41 matches
Mail list logo
