chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
> /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk and
> /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk
>
> don't hold the clues for you?
Thanks. It's a maze, that /usr/ports/Mk framework ;-)
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgpIgv3ffv01u.pgp
Description: PGP s
> chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>
>>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>>
>> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
>> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
>
> So
chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>
> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
Sounds like
> Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with
> misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is
> unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it).
> The COMMENT became
>The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, remo
Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with
misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is
unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it).
The COMMENT became
The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, removed in Fre
Andrew Berg wrote:
> Going by the other fortune file ports, misc/fortune-offensive or
> something very similar would be more appropriate.
Fair enough, sounds good to me.
> The fortunes were removed in one of the ALPHA releases if not before
> then (certainly before 10 was branched to -STABLE), s
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:54:37 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@
> but not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found
> a typical WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have
> been kicked o
On 2013.12.05 15:54, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@ but
> not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found a typical
> WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have been kicked out
> of 10-BETA4. Since
A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@ but
not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found a typical
WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have been kicked out
of 10-BETA4. Since I (and many others) find this Just Plain Stupid (tm) I
crea
