chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote: >> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I >> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well? > > Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license, > or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=BSD is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE? AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgpbeE2FMw5VY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
