> chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote: > >>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I >>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well? >> >> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license, >> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate. > > Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=BSD > is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE?
Greetings, /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk and /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk don't hold the clues for you? Best wishes. --Chris > > AvW > > -- > I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
