Andrew Berg wrote: > Going by the other fortune file ports, misc/fortune-offensive or > something very similar would be more appropriate.
Fair enough, sounds good to me. > The fortunes were removed in one of the ALPHA releases if not before > then (certainly before 10 was branched to -STABLE), so I'm sure it's > fine to simply target 10. Okay, so that would be 1000000 then. > Perhaps it would be better to specify the version - e.g., "The offensive > fortune cookies present the 9.x base system that were removed in 10.x." They were there in earlier base systems too, but I'll work on the wording a bit more. Thanks for the suggestion. AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgp3mLdVMdAnd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
