Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2021, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > I'd use /usr/ports/mail/procmail > > I wouldn't; it's an unsupported and obscure scripting language just asking > for bugs, and actually has several CVEs against it. URLs please ? N

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

dia.org/wiki/Phabricator ... https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/devel/phabricator/pkg-descr I'd use /usr/ports/mail/procmail https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/dev-commits-ports-all/2021-May/date.html ~/.procmailrc example: :0 H * ^Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-...@freebsd.org { :0

Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd)

Hi, Reference: > From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 22:47:13 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2021 22:01:46 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" > wrote: > >> Delete all those .pkgsave files. These

Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd)

Hi, Reference: > From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:51:05 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2021 16:29:47 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" > wrote: > > Hi ports@ people, > > I wrote this to doc...@

/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd)

Hi ports@ people, I wrote this to doc...@freebsd.org Sun, 02 May 2021 23:43:44 +0200 but no reply by Tue May 4 16:26:48 CEST 2021. Have others seen similar or got ideas to fix gs ghostscript ? --- Hi doc...@freebsd.org as MAINTAINER= in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base I'm stuck,

Re: 12.2-STABLE pkg upgrade remove firefox then need firefox-esr

Thanks Jan Beich for: > "Julian H. Stacey" writes: > > > On 12.2-STABLE pkg upgrade removed firefox, I wonder why ? > > I ran pkg add firefox-esr, > > & am now runnning cd /usr/ports/www/firefox ; make > > Build jobs die due to SIGKILL awfully of

12.2-STABLE pkg upgrade remove firefox then need firefox-esr

On 12.2-STABLE pkg upgrade removed firefox, I wonder why ? I ran pkg add firefox-esr, & am now runnning cd /usr/ports/www/firefox ; make Cheers, -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. http://berklix.com/jhs/ UK stole 3.7 million Brexit votes, 700K in EU http://StolenVotes.UK Treason: Cabi

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Request for net-snmp 5.8 on freeBSD

Hi, Reference: > From: Ramya Yella > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:46:19 +0530 > To: freebsd-ports-annou...@freebsd.org Ramya Yella wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to know when FreeBSD will start supporting the net-snmp > 5.8 version. Any tentative release date? Strange.

Re: jitsi documentation

Bob Eager wrote: > First, thanks to all who worked on this port. I looked at this a while > ago and was totally confused by it all! > > I have installed jitsi in a FreeBSD jail and it works very nicely. I > wrote down what I did so that I could do it again in rather less time. > Then I got a bit c

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video softwar

To: "https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports"; + BCC Bernhard & Astrid Jitsi Meet & Server now in FreeBSD ports/ www/jitsi-meet net-im/jitsi-videobridge (Bernhard, might make NetBSD easier too ?) https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/jitsi-meet/pkg-descr?view=markup https:/

Re: mail/mailman v3?

Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 29.04.20 um 17:00 schrieb Julian H. Stacey: > > Greg Veldman wrote ports@: > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:02:14PM -0700, Chris wrote: > >>> It also wouldn't be that difficult to simply modify mailman(2) > >>> to adopt

Re: mail/mailman v3?

Hi, Reference: > From: Greg Veldman > Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:33:42 -0400 Greg Veldman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3 > > Please do no

Re: mail/mailman v3?

Greg Veldman wrote ports@: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:02:14PM -0700, Chris wrote: > > It also wouldn't be that difficult to simply modify mailman(2) > > to adopt the py3.x language changes. > > To simply make it work, perhaps not. To make it work well and > be reliable... might be more difficul

Re: current: cd /lib ; ln -s libncurses.so.9 libncurses.so.8 xterm & ffox

Hi, Reference: > From: Lorenzo Salvadore > Reply-to: Lorenzo Salvadore > Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 09:56:27 + Lorenzo Salvadore wrote: > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Wednesday 1 April 2020 02:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:

current: cd /lib ; ln -s libncurses.so.9 libncurses.so.8 xterm & ffox

Hi ports@ A libcurses version problem: Running 13.0-CURRENT with /usr/src cat .svn_revision 359319 cat .ctm_status src-cur 14430 /usr/ports cat .svn_revision 529842 cat .ctm_status ports-cur 13423 After pkg upgrade pkg autoremove xterm & firefox failed with ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "li

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

Vincent DEFERT wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to arrive late, I just see this post now. > > If your install videoconferencing software on your machine, you have no > guarantee your contacts will be able to use the same, or that they'll > know how to install it, or even that they'll be allowed to instal

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

Bob Eager wrote: > People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the > port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though > and there was no time to update it). Thanks Bob & others who mailed Jitsi, By chance I too tried a week or so ago & it failed. Just failed

reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

Hi ports@ Any reccomendations of conference / social group party chat server software ? As much more of the world goes into lock down & social distancing, ie not meeting friends at the pub / restuarant etc on Saturday night etc, BBC has shown some social groups have arranged a matrix of 10 to 20 f

Re: CFT: FreeBSD Package Base

On 2019-04-30 17:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote: David Chisnall wrote on 2019/04/30 10:22: On 29/04/2019 21:12, Joe Maloney wrote: With CFT version you chose to build, and package individual components such as sendmail with a port option.  That does entirely solve the problem of being able to rein

Re: ./dovecot start Can't open file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem

Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Julian H. Stacey" writes: > > > Thanks, how do I generate a self signed certficate ? > > /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/SSL.CertificateCreation.txt > covers it, but you can probably get by with > /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/Qu

Re: ./dovecot start Can't open file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem

Hi, Reference: > From: Larry Rosenman > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:54:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 03/11/2019 10:46 am, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > Anyone else seen this or got ideas please: > > cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d; ./dovecot st

./dovecot start Can't open file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem

Hi ports@ Anyone else seen this or got ideas please: cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d; ./dovecot start Can't open file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem /usr/ports/mail/dovecot MAINTAINER= l...@freebsd.orgcc'd pkg info dovecot-2.3.4.1 Secure, fast and powerful IMAP and POP3 server I'm happil

Re: How to alert committer?

Hi, Reference: > From: Bob Eager > Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:08:01 + Bob Eager wrote: > I have a PR on one of my ports, and I agree with the patch provided. > > I'm not sure how to signal to have the port committed. I can obviously > ask here (and am now doing so) but is there

Re: chrome error: libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "environ"

Hi, Reference: > From: Kubilay Kocak > Reply-to: ko...@freebsd.org > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 15:50:53 +1100 Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 2/01/2019 2:21 pm, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > anyone else seen this or have ideas please: > > chro

chrome error: libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "environ"

Hi ports@ anyone else seen this or have ideas please: chrome ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "environ" uname 13.0-CURRENT /usr/src/.svn_revision 342578 ls -l /usr/local/lib/libglib* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 13 02:21 /usr/local/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0@ -

1 line patch for ports/graphics/tiff/files/patch-tiff2ps.c

Here is is a 1 line patch, commenting out a bad return after a perhaps aprropriate error check, http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/gen/graphics/tiff/files/patch-tiff2ps It fixes FreeBSD current ports/graphics/tiff PORTVERSION=4.0.10 at 2018-12-26 Someone on CC please also f

ports/www/apache24 cgi-bin fails, OK on apache22 (fwd)

ranted Order allow,deny Allow from all DirectoryIndex index.html Require all denied ErrorLog "/var/log/httpd-error.log" LogLevel warn ServerSignature Off LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent

Re: on current, pkg install openssl kills pkg

Hi, Reference: > From: Bernard Spil > Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 02:08:08 +0100 Bernard Spil wrote: > On 2018-10-17 0:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi po...@freebsd.org > > cc br...@freebsd.org maintaine= of ports/security/openssl > > > > On cur

Re: on current, pkg install openssl kills pkg

David Wolfskill mailed: > That's probably a good point at which to use pkg-static (instead of > pkg).. Ah Yes, I forgot that existed, thanks David. I tried it & it rescued pkg: pkg install openssl Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... ... Edit /usr/local/openssl

on current, pkg install openssl kills pkg

Hi po...@freebsd.org cc br...@freebsd.org maintaine= of ports/security/openssl On current, 12.0-ALPHA9, this kills pkg: pkg install openssl uname -r# 12.0-ALPHA9 cd /usr/src cat .ctm_status # src-cur 13733 cat .svn_revision

Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 05:32:17 +0200 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related > > posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like > > freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar. > > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create

Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:21:59 +0200 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD. Thanks, that sounds helpful, as that is a large group of applications. > This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie, > Spark (probably s

Re: Any way to prevent do-extract chmod and chown?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:05:59 +0200 "Mathieu Arnold" said On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 01:43:41PM -0400, Joseph Ward wrote: > Thank you.  I found that to be the case; even though changing the > "do-extract" target successfully staged the files and directories with > the original permissions, pkg crea

Re: make[1]: cannot open Makefile for new custom port

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:36:05 -0400 "Joseph Ward" said Hi all, I'm attempting to make my first port which is attempting to literally unpack a tgz into the correct location.  I'm wanting a port, as I want this to be versioned and upgradable on all my systems via pkg (as well as to handle depend

Re: icedtea-web broken after removal of libxul

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:41:35 +0200 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said After remove of libxul, icedtea-web does not configure configure: error: Package requirements (mozilla-plugin) were not met: Package 'mozilla-plugin', required by 'virtual:world', not found After a (weak) try with make MOZILLA_LI

Re: Of Git and M$

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) "Roger Marquis" said Anonymous (Carmel NY) wrote: >> of course microsoft bought it to steal software more efficiently. > > Steal what? It is already freely available. This is just more FUD spread by > people who fail to comprehend the actual logistics o

Re: Of Git and M$

On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:26:36 +1000 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document format (u

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:05:40 +0200 "Jan Bramkamp" said On 25.05.18 09:29, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Chris H wrote: >> On Thu, 24 May 2018 22:16:42 +0200 "Bernhard Froehlich" >> said >> >>> Am 24.05.2018 21:

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Thu, 24 May 2018 19:39:22 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" said Hi Chris, On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Chris H wrote: > I should have no trouble introducing Wireguard to the ports system today. I'm not a native fluent speaker of FreeBSDese, but my understanding is: a)

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:39:39 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:25 PM Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:02:10 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" > said > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:57 PM Chris H wrote: > > > > > On

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:02:10 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:57 PM Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:03:47 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" > said > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:27 AM Bob Eager wrote: > > > > >

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:03:47 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:27 AM Bob Eager wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:08:17 +0100 > Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > > In addition to that it would be nice (if it's not already done) to > > store this information in a log file somew

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:39:54 +0700 "Eugene Grosbein" said On 24.05.2018 15:08, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > The first thing me and probably many other do after install is > pkg install xxx yyy zzz > from console (meaning no scrollback buffer). > > With xorg and friends this means hundre

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:15:28 +0200 "Bernhard Fröhlich" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > We now have a release, so the full instructions for the packages are: > > 1. wireguard-tools, providing wg(8) and wg-quick(8) > Runtime dependencies: bash, wireguard-go > Bu

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Mon, 21 May 2018 23:35:45 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" said [cross-posted to the WireGuard mailing list] Hello FreeBSD Ports List, I'm the author of WireGuard [1], a secure network tunnel protocol [2] and a set of implementations of it. It was originally designed for the Linux kernel, but we

Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

CC pruned, & 1 added as som thread commonality below *** Miroslav Lachman wrote: > The cad/freecad port has PORTNAME= FreeCAD in the Makefile, so the > package name is FreeCAD-0.17.13509.txz > > Miroslav Lachman Thanks. As these fail: pkg search cad | grep -i free pkg search CAD

Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

blubee blubeeme wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > I wrote Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0200 > > > > > Hi po...@freebsd.org people, > > > Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building > > >

Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

I wrote Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0200 > Hi po...@freebsd.org people, > Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building > architecture schematic diagram editor, please ? To plan eg big house room > layouts { furniture moves, building sale / rent} etc ? > > I'm not looking fo

Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

> Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building > architecture schematic diagram editor, please ? Thanks for all suggestions, I installed all to try, but about to travel so will be a few days before I try, I'll summarise to list with a few notes after I've tried them. Cheer

reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

Hi po...@freebsd.org people, Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor, please ? To plan eg big house room layouts { furniture moves, building sale / rent} etc ? I'm not looking for professional architects or structural engineers too

make package, register Error code 70 Stop.

Hi ports@ On 2 boxes with current src/ & ports/, I've been running (native in /usr/ports/ not poudriere) various cd /usr/ports/___/___ ; make package-recursive , I got tired of repeated Error code 70, samples below, so I wrote a temporary patch which fixes it, below. In case its relevant: My b

Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:37:54 +0100 "Andreas Andersson" said So, moonchild (that's his actual name (or tilltalsnamn in swedish) ) might own the trademark. But atleast Swedish trademark laws https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/varumarkeslag-20101877_sfs-

Re: Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:02:35 -0700 "Kirk Coombs" said Hello, I’m working on building my very first port (for the server component from https://www.urbackup.org/ ). Since this my first attempt at porting, I have ended up iterating a lot on the pkg-plist, new files in

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:16:30 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said On 1/5/18 5:09 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 05.01.2018 09:44, Matthew Luckie wrote: > >> My main worry is that I could not find a single port that apparently >> depends on security/openssl. I'm worried that its more complicated than

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:44:31 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said On 01/05/18 15:37, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said > >> Hi, >> >> I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to >&g

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said Hi, I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have this port depend on ports openssl for freebsd rel

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:29:40 +0100 "Michael Gmelin" said > On 20. Dec 2017, at 18:50, Chris H wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:43 + said > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:23:59 + "Johannes Lundberg" > said > >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 a

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:43 + said On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:23:59 + "Johannes Lundberg" said On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Chris H wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 + "Johannes Lundberg" > said > >> Hi >> >> I want to sugges

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 + "Johannes Lundberg" said Hi I want to suggest that we enable wayland by default. In current state having some parts of wayland in ports is basically useless the end-users themselves re-build gtk30 and mesa-libs with wayland enabled. libwayland-egl.so from me

Re: Procmail got updated!

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:09:30 +0100 "Matthias Andree" said Am 18.12.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Dave Horsfall: > Doing my regular update, and... > >     Upgrading procmail from 3.22_9 to 3.22_10... > > Good grief; who's the masochist who volunteered to support this > obscure insecure and hitherto-uns

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:17:29 -0800 said On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:16:39 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" said > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:53:38 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" > > said > > > > I am attempting

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:16:39 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" said On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:53:38 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" > said > > I am attempting to submit a fix for a slave port, >> multimedia/avidemux_plugins. All

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:53:38 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" said I am attempting to submit a fix for a slave port, multimedia/avidemux_plugins. All of the patches are in the master port, avidemux. So I make all of the fixes and run "make makepatch". All of the patches are generated into avidemux/files.

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:59:34 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" said On 12/14/17 17:07, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:15:35 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" said >> On 12/13/17 22:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Pedro Giffun

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:15:35 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" said On 12/13/17 22:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Pedro Giffuni <mailto:p...@freebsd.org>> wrote: Hello; On 13/12/2017 21:11, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:24 -0500 "Pedro Gif

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:24 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" said On 12/10/17 14:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 11.12.2017 2:22, Pedro Giffuni пишет: >> Hello guys; >> >> I would like to attempt a port for WPS Office (AKA Kingsoft Office): >> >> http://wps-community.org/ >> >> Are there guidelines for linu

Re: lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:19:52 +0100 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said python27 Makefile: .if !exists(/usr/bin/ypcat) || defined(WITHOUT_NIS)     @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/disabled_module_list =[^]]*/&, "nis"/' \     ${WRKSRC}/setup.py .endif you can try comment out the line with .if a

Re: lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:38:35 +0100 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said There https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186192 is a better way WITHOUT_NIS=yes in /etc/make.conf Spot on, Walter! I was just going to indicate that I figured that out. Thank you! Why does one *need* to indicat

Why can't I build Python without nis -- yp(8)?!?

Hello all, I just finished a fresh install of CURRENT, followed by a build/install of world/kernel. I'm now building up all of my ports base. But can't get Python to install -- *any version*, apparently because I don't have/use nis ( yp(8) ). WTF? Since when does Python *require* yp/nis, and how/w

lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

Hello all, Just performed a fresh install of 12 @r326056 followed by a build/install of world/kernel. All went pretty much as expected. But as I now start building/installing all my needed ports. I find everything is fine except Python, or anything that requires it. No matter which version I attem

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:23:55 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > With transparency, I mean: > > - reverse dns is set > > - scan from the same IP all the time > They don't. For the sake of argument, I'll name showdan; they use (off > the top of my head) some 9 to 12 addresses. Addresses the move,

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:59:04 +0100 "Guido Falsi" said On 12/09/2017 01:34, Chris H wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" > said > >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >> > First, there is movement afoot t

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:54:26 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Chris H wrote: > pf(4) has dropped any/all communication from the showdan "project" > *long* ago for all the systems I'm responsible for, and along with all > the myriad

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:45:11 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > Let me attempt to make my point another way (and stay closer to topic). > A user is able to accomplish more from sendmail in base, than with any > other MX port in base alone. [list of sendmail features shortend for brevity] > Many o

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:46:55 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > If you, as an administrator of a/your system(s), see no problem with > (port) scanners, and take no action to thwart such activity. You are > more than likely to encounter trouble(s) down the road. Right, portscanning is bad, if not

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:36:49 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > if the majority of people install their systems via packages, that makes for > a fairly common FreeBSD base across all users. Why would a system installed via packaged be more homogenous than one installed as base, and updated via fr

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:39:02 -0800 said On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:10:32 + "Matt Smith" said > On Dec 10 14:58, Chris H wrote: >>OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: >>FreeBSD >>The power to serve! > > >>but many of the p

Re: What is the preferred MASTER_SITES for python port?

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:46:43 +0300 "Sergey Akhmatov" said Hello. Suppose I want to port some python package that exists in the Python Package Index (PyPI) and has it's source code available on some official website or github. Is there any policy or recommended practice for choosing MASTER_

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:42:57 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 02:58:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > > > OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: > > > FreeBSD > > > The power to serve! > > > >

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:10:32 + "Matt Smith" said On Dec 10 14:58, Chris H wrote: >OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: >FreeBSD >The power to serve! > >but many of the proposed, and recent changes/removals end up more like: >Fre

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:49:06 +0100 "Lars Engels" said On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 02:58:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: > FreeBSD > The power to serve! > > but many of the proposed, and recent changes/removals

Re: License and adopting software

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:24:53 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like the original > > developer is not and have not done any work o

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:54:54 -0700 "Adam Weinberger" said > On 8 Dec, 2017, at 20:11, Chris H wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said > >> Hi! >> > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:49:02 -0700 "Adam Weinberger" said > On 10 Dec, 2017, at 10:11, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 01:21:13PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Hence the current sendmail in base is neither fish nor fowl: way >> overpowered for almost all installations, but

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:25:17 +0100 "Matthieu Volat" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:18:28 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Thu, 7 Dec 2017 > 14:54:27 > > +0100): > > > > > On Thu, Dec 07,

Re: Flavors support of portupgrade

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:20:47 + "Ben Woods" said On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 at 5:18 pm, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere and synth already support flavors. As for portmaster, Stefan > Esser (s...@freebsd.org) said he is working now. Then what about > portupgrade? Is anybody working? >

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:12:12 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as it is)... Are there any other lists tha

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > > replace it with dma(1). > Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an antispam > system that targets the use of Sendmail, If sendm

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:25:22 -0800 said On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > replace it with dma(1). > > There is? Is there anything else that they'

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > replace it with dma(1). There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? (I'm still annoyed that t

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:14:11 -0600 "Paul Schmehl" said --On December 8, 2017 at 12:49:44 PM -0800 Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Schmehl > wrote: > > > > How do you do this? I have a number of py ports that need to be updated, > but portmaster chokes on the

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:33:08 +0100 "Lars Engels" said On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere > directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this > compilation is missing some other packag

# FLAVORLESS tag?

As I take inventory before embarking on "flavoring" those ports I maintain that can be flavored. I wanted to make my life simpler, and in an effort to do so, began tagging those that couldn't be flavored (no options, etc...) with # FLAVORLESS This made it trivial for future searches to weed out th

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:40:27 -0800 "Mel Pilgrim" said On 12/5/2017 2:25 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > Thank you for taking a perfectly good system and breaking it as well as > making it unusable, unstable.  You just don't know of all the countless > hours spent after running an update and taking a w

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:48:12 -0600 "Mark Linimon" said On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:42:27AM -0800, Chris H wrote: > IMHO it might be a good idea to make a legacy branch, in the ports > tree before gutting the pre-NG stuff. Good lord, people. The pre-NG stuff has Left The Buil

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 03:33:10 -0800 "David Wolfskill" said On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:55AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > ... > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes, > but there is sti

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 22:04:15 + "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>" said On Sunday, December 3, 2017 3:46 PM, Chris H stated: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" > po...@freebsd.org> said > > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Ka

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" said On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system > > that is officially support

Re: Exporting phone list to a fritz router (.xml) & android phone app.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:01:20 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" said "Chris H" wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:42:14 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" said > > > Hi ports@ people > > Any reccomendations of ports/ that may manage phone & address booke, >

Re: Exporting phone list to a fritz router (.xml) & android phone app.

"Chris H" wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:42:14 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" said > > > Hi ports@ people > > Any reccomendations of ports/ that may manage phone & address booke, > > & import/export to Fritz Routers & Android phone app ? Sh

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >