On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:09:30 +0100 "Matthias Andree" <matthias.and...@gmx.de> said
Am 18.12.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Dave Horsfall: > Doing my regular update, and... > > Upgrading procmail from 3.22_9 to 3.22_10... > > Good grief; who's the masochist who volunteered to support this > obscure insecure and hitherto-unsupported scripting language? > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=455800 I'd agree we should pull the plug on the package. We'll be in for the usual "but it works for me" screaming of the irresponsible people who don't care (and most of them won't know that they need to write the exception/error handling themselves in their .procmailrc recipes). Sunpoet, can we mark the port as deprecated given that even the upstream once said it should best be abolished? I can't find the reference now, the procmail.org website displays "Site hosting in transit, information will be back up shortly."
FWIW procmail.org has shown that banner since 2015-11 (november, 2015). A safe bet, that they won't be changing that anytime soon. :-) --Chris
_______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
