I have a 9STABLE server, amd64, with pkg 1.2.1.
When doing a pkg search or pkg update, I get the following messages
pkg: Error loading trusted certificates
pkg: Unable to find catalogs
How do I correct this problem?
--
Best regards,
Derek Tattersall
d...@mebtel.net dlt...@yahoo.com
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 20:23:12 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
> > Have you tried removing digests.txz, repo.txz and packagesite.txz?
>
> Certainly. In fact, those files aren't even there. There's a digests
> file (no .txz) and the yaml files I mentioned earlier, bu
chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
> /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk and
> /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk
>
> don't hold the clues for you?
Thanks. It's a maze, that /usr/ports/Mk framework ;-)
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgpIgv3ffv01u.pgp
Description: PGP s
> chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>
>>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>>
>> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
>> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
>
> So
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Have you tried removing digests.txz, repo.txz and packagesite.txz?
Certainly. In fact, those files aren't even there. There's a digests file
(no .txz) and the yaml files I mentioned earlier, but not the usual
digests.txz, filesite.txz, packagesite.txz and repo.txz.
AvW
-
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:37:59 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE/amd64 in a build jail.
>
> # pkg repo -l /usr/ports/packages/All /usr/local/etc/ssl/keys/pkg.key
> Generating repository catalog in /usr/ports/packages/All:
> \Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> The above
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE/amd64 in a build jail.
# pkg repo -l /usr/ports/packages/All /usr/local/etc/ssl/keys/pkg.key
Generating repository catalog in /usr/ports/packages/All: \Segmentation fault
(core dumped)
The above has been working splendidly for quite a while but recently
started segfaulting al
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 05:21:11 +0200
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:25:52AM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > I tested your patch on 10-BETA2 and 10-BETA3. I built our complete
> > production environment from scratch, ran a huge number of unit and
> > integration tests. Every
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:06:59 -0500 Vick Khera wrote:
> I have a port locally that does this to install a file so other ports that
> depend on this can have something to depend on from the file system.
You don't need any file, ports can depend on pkgname [1]:
p5-Spiffy>=0.26:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-S
On 12/06/13 17:38, Vick Khera wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
I think you should use ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}, not ${LOCALBASE}.
Thanks. that makes more sense.
Also, instead of ${CP} you should use the INSTALL_ macros:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I think you should use ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}, not ${LOCALBASE}.
>
Thanks. that makes more sense.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:06:59 -0500
Vick Khera wrote:
> I have a port locally that does this to install a file so other ports
> that depend on this can have something to depend on from the file
> system.
>
> do-install:
> ${CP} /dev/null ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rwde-base-installed
>
>
> Lately
I have a port locally that does this to install a file so other ports that
depend on this can have something to depend on from the file system.
do-install:
${CP} /dev/null ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rwde-base-installed
Lately it seems that the ports does a staging step, and the above file is
not f
chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>
> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
Sounds like
> Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with
> misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is
> unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it).
> The COMMENT became
>The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, remo
Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with
misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is
unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it).
The COMMENT became
The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, removed in Fre
- Enable staging
- Update USES
- Use new options framework
- Always stage documentation
- Strip installed binaries
-
Build ID: 20131206122601-49941
Job owner: marty...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 7 minute
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:36:57 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Michael Gmelin wrote
> in <20131206001554.0d9d3...@bsd64.grem.de>:
>
> fr> I'm in the process of changing ports from ports iconv to iconv in
> fr> base. I noticed that transliteration doesn't work in base as it
> fr> does with icon
Andrew Berg wrote:
> Going by the other fortune file ports, misc/fortune-offensive or
> something very similar would be more appropriate.
Fair enough, sounds good to me.
> The fortunes were removed in one of the ALPHA releases if not before
> then (certainly before 10 was branched to -STABLE), s
Hi,
I'm trying to get XBMC building on 10.0-BETA4 but i'm stuck with a autoconf
problem:
to reproduce it:
$ make -C /usr/ports/multimedia/xbmc
$ autoreconf -vif /usr/ports/multimedia/xbmc/work/xbmc-12.2/lib/cpluff/
and you will get this error:
autoreconf-2.69: Entering directory `lib/cpluff'
auto
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:54:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> From: Baptiste Daroussin
> Subject: Re: Output change of 'pkg info' after 1.2.
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:24:09 +0100
>
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (J
Michael Gmelin wrote
in <20131206001554.0d9d3...@bsd64.grem.de>:
fr> I'm in the process of changing ports from ports iconv to iconv in base.
fr> I noticed that transliteration doesn't work in base as it does with
fr> iconv from ports. Examples:
fr>
fr> "T\xc5\xbdst"
fr> ports: "TZst"
fr> base:
22 matches
Mail list logo
