I have an HPE branded 2x25G qlogic card (HPE Eth 1G 2p 368i/10G 2p
568FLR-MMSFP+ Adptr 866467-B21) which support SR-IOV. I have enabled it using
the following configuration below. I confirmed SR-IOV is enabled and when
running the pciconf command I see the VFs. Unfortunately the VI I set with
p
Is this possible to set the FEC mode on a qlnxe interface? I have plugged a non
officiall CISCO 100G DAC on the HPE Eth 4x25Gb 1p 620QSFP28 Adptr" card
(817762-B21) but I get the following on freebsd side:
```
ifconfig -v ql0
ql0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=507bb
ether
For some reasons. I can’t use SR-IOV on my freebsd machines (HPE DL160 gen10)
with latest 25G HPE branded cards. I opened tickets for that but since then no
move happened.
So I wonder id there is a good setup to use these cards with the
virtualization. Which kind of performance should I expect
These are basic tests with iperf3 and
>> TSO/LRO enabled).
>>
>> @Michael Dexter is working on a document that contains configuration
>> examples and test results for the different network backend available in
>> bhyve.
>>
>> If you need help, let me know and
p, let me know and we can set up a call.
> Take care.
> Santi
>
> On 8/8/22 08:57, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> For some reasons. I can’t use SR-IOV on my freebsd machines (HPE DL160
>> gen10) with latest 25G HPE branded cards. I opened tickets for that but
>> si
Is there any reason to not have qlnxe(4) available during installation? I can
of course load it from the shell, but what is the reason to not have it
available like others drivers? Is this maintained?
Benoît
I have setup 3 nodes on a fresh Freebsd 13.1-RELEASE-p1. They have the same
gateway and IPS are in same /64. All 3 nodes are on the same switch (mikrotik)
and same vlan untagged.
I can ping them from an external machine through the router/gateway but the
nodes can't ping each others. When I run
;
> My rc.conf config has:
> ifconfig_genet0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
>
> Can you post the output of "ifconfig" and "ipfw show"?
> Can you ping the link-local address of the other hosts?
>
> Regards.
> Ronald.
>
> Van: Benoit Chesneau
> D
onfig has:
>> ifconfig_genet0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
>>
>> Can you post the output of "ifconfig" and "ipfw show"?
>> Can you ping the link-local address of the other hosts?
>>
>> Regards.
>> Ronald.
>>
>> Van: Benoit Ches
and use it to boot the machine. (BTW: for me this does not work well
> enough, so I run rtsold explicitly.) Setting accept_rtadv by ifconfig will
> not run rtsol.
>
> Regards,
> Ronald.
>
> Van: Benoit Chesneau
> Datum: maandag, 15 augustus 2022 11:25
> Aan: Benoit Che
erstand what is the issue :/
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 15th, 2022 at 11:53, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> Unfortunately I get the same results with rtsold enabled and the interface
> up. It doesn't seems related to teh switch since link-loc
Setting the IPv4 makes it works indeed! How did you find it? I will open a
ticket about it.
Thanks a lot to both of you anyway :)
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 15th, 2022 at 13:01, Michael Gmelin
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:07:54 +0000
&g
I mean it would be better if I could be IPv6 only but that a good first step :)
Benoît
> Setting the IPv4 makes it works indeed! How did you find it? I will open a
> ticket about it.
>
> Thanks a lot to both of you anyway :)
>
I really have to assign an IP address. 8t wasn't enough when I just addes "up".
The driver is old maybe there have been some fixes since in linux version.
Benoît
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 13:18, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:11:41 +
> Benoit Chesneau
here is the ticket opened:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265857
Thanks again for the help :)
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 15th, 2022 at 13:21, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I really have to assign an IP address. 8t wasn't enough when I ju
rt to play nice with SR-IOV you can pass a VF to the Jail,
> some NICs allow creating L2 "high speed" switches in the card ( never used
> one).
>
> Regarding L3 (in-kernel), the overhead will be bigger than using vale, but
> then you can leverage multi-path, VX
hi all ,
I've an issue to achieve goos performance using netgraph thatis not reproduced
with a if_bridge interface. I have setup my network using netgraph like this:
https://www.friendpaste.com/4zrXvdx1l5fjDRG1oheHMN
I am using ngeth1 as main port and setup it to 10G connected to a bridge linked
Hi all,
I've created a jail using bastille and setup network. The mainin terface is a
25Gbps nic and between hosts I get 24.6 Gbits/sec :
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.87 GBytes 24.6 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.88 GBytes 24.7 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.87 GBytes 24.7
s/sec 481 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 18.7 GBytes 16.0 Gbits/sec receiver
```
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, May 23rd, 2023 at 23:15, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 19:58:07 +0000
> Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu wrot
I read this old post :
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/second-mac-address-to-a-network-adapter.32176/#post-612587
Would ng_eiface + ng_bridge really replace a macvlan [1] [2] interface ? What
would be the other way to have such interface?
Benoît
[1]
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/1
Hi,
I'm trying to advertise and get routing info via BGP andbird in a distinct fib
but it seems that bird is always trying to connect to peers on the Fib 0. I
tried the following configuration:
```
protocol bgp transit_ipv4_1 {
local A.B.C.1 as ;
neighbor A.B.C.0 as
I agree it looks like just a shortcut, though it seems it's optimiszed at the
kernel level to reduce the exchanges in memory. But unsure
>
> NB2: What are you trying to accomplish?
I wanted a cheap way to expose and connect between themselves the vms. No need
for the bridge, to learn since t
Hi,
When I setup a loopback to a /32 , I can add a /24 as a blackhole route
anymore. I can only create a /24 attached to this looopback. Ie.
when `lo1` is set to `1.1.1.1/32` I cant create a blackhole route to
`1.1.1.0/24` using the command : ` route add 1.1.1.0/24 -blackhole` . Is there
any r
ry Non-Fatal Error
Hope it helps,
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 10:29, Alexander Chernikov
wrote:
> > On 14 Jun 2023, at 07:05, Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I setup a loop
10:38, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answer. I'm using Freebsd 13.2 latest version:
>
> $ uname -srm
> FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE amd64
>
> I edited the filtred result of the table since it has a full view:
>
> netstat -4rnW |grep -e "1.
at 11:42, Alexander Chernikov
wrote:
> > On 14 Jun 2023, at 10:06, Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu wrote:
> >
> > I forgot oto add the error message , sorry.
> >
> > When I try to set the theblackhole flag I get the following error:
> >
&
wrote:
> Hello all
>
> > Am 14.06.2023 um 11:06 schrieb Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu:
> > route: writing to routing socket: Operation not supported
> > change net 1.1.1.0 fib 0: Operation not supported
>
>
> it says "change not supported"
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 11:56, Alexander Chernikov
wrote:
> Could you try:
> 1) removing the 1.1.1.0/24 route
> 2) removing the 1.1.1.1/32 from the lo1
> 3) provide the output for `route -n get 1.1.1.0/24`
> 4) provide the output for `route -n get 1.1
12:18, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 11:56, Alexander Chernikov
> melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> > Could you try:
> > 1) removing the 1.1.1.0/24 route
> > 2) removing the 1.1.1.1/32 from the
: PID 72860: Unable to find ifa for blackhole/reject
nhop
```
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 12:18, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 11:56, Alexander Chernikov
> melif...@freeb
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 14th, 2023 at 12:36, Alexander Chernikov
wrote:
> > On 14 Jun 2023, at 11:26, Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu wrote:
> >
> > I found an interresting log in dmesg (see below). Not sure how it can
> > ha
Hi all,
i've some issue when using bird with a loopback for an rr . I have the loopback
lo1 with the public IP 1.1.1.1. remote 1.1.1.2 is connected via a vlan. The
issue is that the netx hop is set to the vlan static IP instead of the local
address set in the configuration. What could be the is
, 2023 at 13:35, Stephane Rochoy
wrote:
> Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu writes:
>
> > … What could be the issue?
> >
> > More infos below. Hope It helps.
> >
> > # ifconfig lo1
> > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu
> > 16384
> > opt
, June 15th, 2023 at 14:42, Stephane Rochoy
wrote:
> Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu writes:
>
> > Thanks for the hint. Unfortunately when I am setting it to /30
> > the machine stop to be advertised :/ Most probably because /30
> > will be routed locally?
>
Should I better use `tap` instead of `lo` interface with bird? On linux they
are using a dummy interface for it, so I'm wondering
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, June 15th, 2023 at 14:48, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I see. This may indeed be related...
>
&g
---
On Thursday, June 15th, 2023 at 14:48, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I see. This may indeed be related...
>
> The current route is learnt using OSPF. This is weird to not have it using
> the source address configured in bird though:/
>
> Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
>
Is this behaviour expected? Can we replace the next hop to remove the need of a
nat?
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, June 16th, 2023 at 12:24, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> After doing more testing onf Freebsd 13.2 , bird 2.13:
>
> When 1.1.1.1/31 and 1.1.1.2/31 are set on
I read different forums and blog [1] and it seems that the DAD issue is
occurring offen with jails and is not only related to mce [2] . Is there any
trick as of today that would help to fix it? I have tempted to report also on
the forum but didn't get any answer yet [3]
I always need for now to
Hi all,
I am trying to understand how works sriov with the mlx5en(4) driver.
In particularly should Isetup the VF-0 as passthrough false? On intel NIC i
would have to set one of the VF not passthrough for the host. It seems that
sr-iov is behaving differently on mellanox: even if all VFs are s
Hi all,
I have a weird issue there,
I have an ipv6 only host aon which I am starting a jail.Jalil have a vnet
interface through a bridge created on the host:
For some reason the jail can't get access and is not accessible to internet
when I setup an IPV4 on it (and right gateway). Is this some
It works, over IPv6. I don't get any error. WHen I launch dh-client manually I
get an IP. But when setting the if the rc.conf doesn't add an IPv4.
This is odd.
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 2nd, 2023 at 12:30, felix.reichenber...@tuta.io
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since
I may be wrong but xdp linux looks a lot like netgraph. Packets are processed
at kernel level and we can chain instructions over them. Is there any
comparison of their features around?
Before I am doing some performance tests myself, did someone comparend netgraph
ng_bridge vs if_bridge with recent multi thread additions in netgraph ?
The advantage I see in using netgraph is remooving the need of using tap
interfaces and instead using netgraph sockets. Which seems to be more
Hi all,
Reading the Freebsd 14.0 changes it seems that netfli xsponsors the removal of
old drivers. Not sure what it means exactly, but as of todaty which kind of
full featured NIC for servers we can use that bring at least 2x25G ? By full
featured I mean good support of SR-IOV and netmap thoug
I have setup 1 fib for normal routing and 1 for OOB, SSH should be able to run
in the 2 networks handled in different fibs. How to have ssh working in 2 fibs?
Any help / link is appreciated :)
Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure
ces running.
>
> Symlink sshd RC script, then use rc conf entries like
>
> sshd_adm_enable="YES"
> sshd_adm_fib="2"
> sshd_adm_flags="-f /etc/ssh/sshd_config.adm -o PidFile=/var/run/sshd_adm.pid"
>
> Le 10 novembre 2023 21:42:14 GMT+01:00, Benoit
Is there a way to ensure that the IP set in loopback on the rc.conf is always
used as source for routing. I setup it like this:
```
cloned_interfaces="lo1"
ifconfig_lo1="inet 195.24.245.226/32 up"
ifconfig_lo1_ipv6="inet6 2a12:5541:1:1::3/128"
```
and others IP are set on interfaces or vlans. Al
This makes sense. Thanks for the links!
Benoît
On Saturday, November 11th, 2023 at 12:03, Zhenlei Huang
wrote:
>> On Nov 11, 2023, at 5:56 PM, Benoit Chesneau
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to ensure that the IP set in loopback on the rc.conf is
>> always used
netgraph and vpp looks similar in their intent. Both are graphs to process
packets.
I thought that usinv netgraph sounds interresting to build a modern router or
cpe. What about the perforance? Did anyone compRe? Also is there any difference
in term of implementation of the processing? Id ther
00:33, Jim Thompson <[j...@netgate.com](mailto:Le sam.
25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson < a écrit :
> On Nov 24, 2023 at 12:48:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
>
>> netgraph and vpp looks similar in their intent. Both are graphs to process
>> packets.
>>
Is there a way to cross-connect 2 interfaces without using a bridge . Something
similar to the command ˋl2 xconnect` in vpp (or cisco) :
https://docs.fd.io/vpp/16.12/vnet_vnet_l2.html
This could be quite handy to create a patch between diffrent machines in the
network.
Benoît
thanks, I didn't noticed this one.
Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
On Saturday, November 25th, 2023 at 23:30, Jim Thompson
wrote:
> ng_hub(4)
>
>> On Nov 25, 2023, at 8:34 AM, Benoit Ch
Thanks! I guess though it will only work for HW interfaces, not with vxlan
interfaces?
Benoît
On Sunday, November 26th, 2023 at 21:43, Vincenzo Maffione
wrote:
> Or, the netmap(4) bridge example
>
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 12:40 PM Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
>
>> thanks,
Hi,
Is IPv6 underlay fully supported with FreebBSD ? I have created the a tunnel
and associated an Ipv6 address to each side. I'm able to ping between each
devicesl. But when I want to curl from the remote side it timeout. Locally on
the remote side it is OK. Is this expected ? Should I rather
cted = Advisory Non-Fatal Error
```
Which is odd. Wonder why it's needed. Thoughts?
Benoît
On Tuesday, December 5th, 2023 at 13:11, Kristof Provost
wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2023, at 11:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is IPv6 underlay fully supported with Free
OK Thanks for the answer. I will create a ticket. Found that the option
`vxlanhwcsum` is the culprit.
Benoît
On Tuesday, December 5th, 2023 at 15:24, Kristof Provost
wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2023, at 15:21, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > Changing the mtu wasn't enough. To make
I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on FreeBSD? Any
link to follow?
Benoît
Awesome :) Thanks for taking care of it!
Benoît Chesneau
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Saturday, February 3rd, 2024 at 22:16, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, at 20:20, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > I there any public source repository for the develo
Im' using the machine as a gateway and use one of the interface as an OOB
access to the applications. I should be able to launch automated commands to
re-configure the applications an other network interfaces from this OOB
interface.
The issue I have is that when I update the rc.conf and launc
I have 2 machines connected on 2 ports of the same switch on which I try to
pass a vlan 10 encapsulated in vlan 330 using dot1 q protocol. The
configuration is very generic, but I cant ping each others machines
Ex:
```
# ping 1.1.1.198
PING 1.1.1.1.198 (1.1.1.1.198): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto:
I have tested the following scenario:
Setup the mellanox driver with SRIOV:
```
$ sudo more /etc/iov/mce0.conf
PF {
device: "mlx5_core0";
num_vfs: 8;
}
DEFAULT {
passthrough: true;
}
VF-0 {
mac-addr: "02:01:02:02:01:00";
}
VF-1 {
mac-addr: "02:01:02:02:01:01";
}
VF-2 {
passthrough: false;}
`
I have read today this deployment git of cRPD the containerized router daemon
from Juniper [1] on which they claim to control the host interface by
discovering them and use the nost network mode of docker [2] .
Can we do the same for jails ? I see a jail requires to statically define the
interf
Hi Konstantin,
indeed the port is plugged to a switch. The port is enabled. So yes that
probably is. Is this a firmware issue or can it be solved in the driver?
Benoît
On Sunday, February 11th, 2024 at 04:50, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 09:23:36AM +0000, Ben
ov
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:30:37AM +, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > indeed the port is plugged to a switch. The port is enabled. So yes that
> > probably is. Is this a firmware issue or can it be solved in the driver?
&
I get the following error "arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 1.1.245.192 on
vlan320" I can't explain. (IP edited). I only setup 1.1.245.192/31 between this
vlan which parent is a VF from a MLX5EN(4) card .
I am using a generated mac address and distribute IPs over OSPF with bird.
What cou
On latest freebsd 14.0 release , I am trying to join an ipv4 address over an
IPV6 local link using the following command :
`route add -net 10.200.1.1/32 -inet6 fe80::9439:36ff:fef0:7cbd%vlan200`
But I get the following error:
```
route add -net 10.200.1.1/32 -inet6 fe80::9439:36ff:fef0:7cbd%vla
o the interface.
Benoît
On Wednesday, March 13th, 2024 at 14:09, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2024, at 12:19 PM, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2024, at 4:36 AM, Benoit Chesneau
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On latest freebsd 14.0 release ,
Hrm I thought it was implemented via
https://reviews.freebsd.org/rG62e1a437f3285e785d9b35a476d36a469a90028d
Wasn't it merged ? (also pretty sure I did test it in freebsd 13).
Benoît
On Wednesday, March 13th, 2024 at 16:23, Marek Zarychta
wrote:
> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 14:09, Zhenlei Huang pi
Thanks for the patch! I will try :)
Benoît
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Wednesday, March 13th, 2024 at 20:07, Marek Zarychta
wrote:
> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 18:59, Marek Zarychta pisze:
>
> > W dniu 13.03.2024 o 16:31, Benoit Chesneau pisze:
> >
> >
07 AM, Marek Zarychta
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 18:59, Marek Zarychta pisze:
>>>
>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 16:31, Benoit Chesneau pisze:
>>>>
>>>>> Hrm I thought it was implemented
>>>>> viahttps://re
How does work VNET with interfaces? Is this as efficient as using pci
passtrough in a vm ?
Benoît
Thanks for the link! the VIMAGE concept is such an interesting hack..
Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Thursday, March 28th, 2024 at 10:17, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:31, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>
Hi,
Is there any high performance penalty to use ng_vlan and from here hook
different vlans compared to use the vlan interface.
To my knowledge the vlan interface is using the hardware filter on the card
when it's available and the ng_vlan is not. But nowadawas with CPUs is the
perforance too
I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would like to
bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the "native" vlan 1. I
Can setup a bridge for vlan 100 and 200 the way below I think but how to create
a bridge for the "native" vlan?
```
ETHER_IF=lagg0
ngctl -f-
Sorry the right config is:
```
ETHER_IF=lagg0
ngctl -f- < wrote:
> I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would like to
> bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the "native" vlan 1. I
> Can setup a bridge for vlan 100 and 200 the way below I think but how
n
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Am 21.04.2022 um 11:29 schrieb Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu:
> > I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would like to
> > bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the "native" vlan 1.
> &g
:11:54PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
> > > Am 21.04.2022 um 11:29 schrieb Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu:
> > > I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would like
> > > to bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the &q
--
On Tuesday, April 26th, 2022 at 12:08, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I am trying
>
> `mkpeer vlan0: bridge 100`but so fat it is returningan error. Should I create
> the node first?
>
>
>
> Benoît Chesneau
>
> Sent with ProtonMail secure email.
> --- Original Mes
ed it was "link0" and not
> "0" :) . But the notmatch bridge will only receive the native vlan it seems.
> Is there a way to get all the other tags, ie not filtered, as well?
>
> Benoît
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Tuesday, April 26th, 2022 at 12
I have an issue with the way the nomatch hook is working. I have linked the
nomatch hook from a lan to a bridge but I can only get the native vlan in it. I
can't even ping new link added to this bridge. Maybe I am missing some
connection?
My goal is to be able to catch non filtered vlan in an n
a
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 29th, 2022 at 09:17, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I have an issue with the way the nomatch hook is working. I have linked the
> nomatch hook from a lan to a bridge but I c
> To quickly test, I created an interface added to the bridge that get its IP
> from DHCP: The IP is correctly given by the DHCP server, but I can't ping
> from the same server (the router with the DHCP server) to this device.
>
> ```
> # ngctl mkpeer public: eiface link2 ether
> # dhclient ngeth
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 29th, 2022 at 09:53, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
>> To quickly test, I created an interface added to the bridge that get its IP
>> from DHCP: The IP is correctly given by the DHCP server, but I can't ping
>> from the same
> root@test:~ # dhclient vtnet0.101
> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0.101 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0.101 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5
> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0.101 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7
> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0.101 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interv
My goal is to setup a p2p connection between the host and a guest vm and use
the host as the nethop for the vm. I'm uskng bhyve for this setup:
1. on the host i create a tap tap0 interface and assign to it the IP 10.1.0,1
2. i create and start the vm using vm-bhyve.
3. in the vm I set the vtnet0
sysctl.conf :
>
> net.link.tap.up_on_open=1
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
>
> Il giorno dom 15 mag 2022 alle ore 14:33 Benoit Chesneau
> ha scritto:
>
>> My goal is to setup a p2p connection between the host and a guest vm and use
>> the host as the nethop for the vm. I'm u
> Does 10.2.0.1 have a route back to the guest?
hrm no, 10.1.0.0 is only internal to the machine indeed... that's probably it
:) I need to find a way to expose these ips indeed . Thanks for the hint.
Benoît
Hi,
It seems that since the latest update of PF in FreeBSD 14.1 mtr doesn't provide
a correct trace using the default. It works with the ``--udp` and `-T` options
so it doesn't seem to be an issue with the next hop. Also mtr works perfectly
on the firewall machine. Issue only happen on the nate
88 matches
Mail list logo
