Should I better use `tap` instead of `lo` interface with bird? On linux they are using a dummy interface for it, so I'm wondering....
Benoît ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, June 15th, 2023 at 14:48, Benoit Chesneau <beno...@enki-multimedia.eu> wrote: > I see. This may indeed be related... > > The current route is learnt using OSPF. This is weird to not have it using > the source address configured in bird though:/ > > Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia > — > t. +33608655490 > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > ------- Original Message ------- > On Thursday, June 15th, 2023 at 14:42, Stephane Rochoy > stephane.roc...@stormshield.eu wrote: > > > > > Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu writes: > > > > > Thanks for the hint. Unfortunately when I am setting it to /30 > > > the machine stop to be advertised :/ Most probably because /30 > > > will be routed locally? > > > > > > Why would setting it to /30 fix the issue ? What does it solves > > > when we do it? > > > > I just reacted to the fact that, IMHO, `route get` is correct when > > responding that 1.1.1.2 is not reachable via lo1. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Stéphane Rochoy > > O: Stormshield