I've found this old ticket that let think it could be supported by ng_vlan : https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224961#c3
But I'm not sure if it really works without some work around: regarding next comment : "Ethernet frames received without vlan tag will be dropped by this comple schema but it is possible to process them too by inserting ng_tee node into the graph" Does anyone have experience with it? Benoît Chesneau Sent with ProtonMail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, April 21st, 2022 at 14:11, Patrick M. Hausen <hau...@punkt.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > Am 21.04.2022 um 11:29 schrieb Benoit Chesneau beno...@enki-multimedia.eu: > > I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would like to > > bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the "native" vlan 1. > > I Can setup a bridge for vlan 100 and 200 the way below I think but how to > > create a bridge for the "native" vlan? > > > I don't have any experience with netgraph but I do know that > you cannot do that with if_bridge(4). If you make the physical > interface the member of a bridge, you cannot use additional > VLANs on that interface, anymore. > > Does anybody know if the same restriction applies to ng_bridge(4)? > > Kind regards, > Patrick > -- > punkt.de GmbH > Patrick M. Hausen > .infrastructure > > Kaiserallee 13a > 76133 Karlsruhe > > Tel. +49 721 9109500 > > https://infrastructure.punkt.de > i...@punkt.de > > AG Mannheim 108285 > Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein
