Thanks for your answer. So i guess if we want to build a modern router without custom code, vpp is the way to go in term de performance?
One thing i really miss ito cross connect 2 interfaces without using a bridge. Somethibg really easy and performant with vpp... Benoit Le sam. 25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson <[j...@netgate.com](mailto:Le sam. 25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson <<a href=)> a écrit : > On Nov 24, 2023 at 12:48:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau <beno...@enki-multimedia.eu> > wrote: > >> netgraph and vpp looks similar in their intent. Both are graphs to process >> packets. >> >> I thought that usinv netgraph sounds interresting to build a modern router >> or cpe. What about the perforance? Did anyone compRe? Also is there any >> difference in term of implementation of the processing? Id there any recent >> paper about netgraph? > > They are very, very different. Netgraph is closer to AT&T streams, but with > mbufs. > > Netgraph would probably be better implemented these days as a set of netmap > modules, ala > https://github.com/zeek/packet-bricks or > https://github.com/outscale/packetgraph (this one is DPDK, but similar > architecture)
