Re: Help testing patch that may help diagnosing the PR 240106

> On Mar 30, 2023, at 2:07 AM, overwatch wrote: > > Zhenlei, I did get your message here, and I believe I understand the > situation, though I don't know if it represents exactly what I was seeing > with our setup. > > I'll try to install your patch and set the switch back to how it was, if

Re: Help testing patch that may help diagnosing the PR 240106

> On Mar 29, 2023, at 1:03 PM, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > Hi, > > I write here so that the original PR 240106 is not polluted. > > Can you please test the attached patch with bridge / lagg setup? > > For long: > > In https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106#c28 you > encounte

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On 10/18/22 17:16, Koichiro Iwao wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:16:12AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Send me the "git show" output of the commit before you push it, and I'll review it for you. --HPS I would like to MFC it to stable/12, too. See attached patches for both branch.

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:16:12AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Send me the "git show" output of the commit before you push it, and I'll > review it for you. > > --HPS I would like to MFC it to stable/12, too. See attached patches for both branch. -- meta commit a57f2b202fa26bc5c3ed63

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:16:12AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Send me the "git show" output of the commit before you push it, and I'll > review it for you. > > --HPS Here it is. See attached file. -- meta commit d91bc94ef5f1514213cb8d507beb3174dea42a73 Author: Hiroki Sato Date: Fr

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On 10/17/22 01:59, Koichiro Iwao wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 06:12:40PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, I think you should do: git cherry-pick -x 9823a0c0acf4fc277a71336ea737e1de7c65742f Then: git commit --amend And remove the "MFC after" tag. Then push it to stable/13 . You mayb

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 06:12:40PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > I think you should do: > > git cherry-pick -x 9823a0c0acf4fc277a71336ea737e1de7c65742f > > Then: > > git commit --amend > > And remove the "MFC after" tag. > > Then push it to stable/13 . You maybe need to speci

Re: Help wanted with MFC 256820

On 10/16/22 18:07, Koichiro Iwao wrote: Hi, I only have ports commit bit. I would like to ship this 1-year-old commit to each stable branch (at least stable/13). I'm happy to help with anything. I would like to try it if I'm permitted to do that with someone's approval. I would appreciate it

Re: Help with VNET

On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:50, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi all, Am 21.10.2020 um 13:37 schrieb Kristof Provost : On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. That’s a limitation of stat

Re: Help with VNET

Hi all, > Am 21.10.2020 um 13:37 schrieb Kristof Provost : > > On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: >> >>> This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. >>> That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. >> >> I had the susp

Re: Help with VNET

On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. I had the suspect... Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? That’s inherent t

Re: Help with VNET

On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. > That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. I had the suspect... Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? Try routing, or try with a wired interface. I'll try and get

Re: Help with VNET

On 10/21/20 12:19 PM, Goran Mekić wrote: Did you setup NAT? No. Should I? Why? The IP I gave to the jail is in the same subnet as the host. BTW, I have similar (working) setups with bhyve (using tap instead of epair) and I didn't setup NAT there. bye & Thanks av. __

Re: Help with VNET

On 21 Oct 2020, at 12:13, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I've been using jails for years with ezjail. Now I'm trying to experiment with VNET. I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) info. Box is a 12.1/amd64. Basic configuration involves wlan0 configured via DH

Re: Help with VNET

On October 21, 2020 10:13:38 AM UTC, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >Hello. > >I've been using jails for years with ezjail. Now I'm trying to >experiment with VNET. >I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) >info. > > > >Box is a 12.1/amd64. >Basic configuration involves wlan

Re: Help provisioning a Samba AD in a jail on ZFS

В Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:26:05 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > To setup a new samba46-based domain controller on ZFS in jail (I'm > > using it with the VIMAGE) you can try following: > > I'm not using VIMAGE (at least not yet). > > > 1. Rebuild the net/samba46 port with the attached patches > >

Re: Help provisioning a Samba AD in a jail on ZFS

On 11/02/17 08:09, Alexander Zagrebin wrote: В Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:01:18 +0100 Andrea Venturoli пишет: It seems it's offtopic here, but I'll try to answer. Doh! I was going to write to -port, but wrote -net in the end... Sorry! To setup a new samba46-based domain controller on ZFS in jail

Re: Help provisioning a Samba AD in a jail on ZFS

В Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:01:18 +0100 Andrea Venturoli пишет: It seems it's offtopic here, but I'll try to answer. To setup a new samba46-based domain controller on ZFS in jail (I'm using it with the VIMAGE) you can try following: 1. Rebuild the net/samba46 port with the attached patches (patch-l

Re: Help with mbuf exhaustion

My mistake, the "1" was cut off from my message. We are actually on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p21, _not_ p2 -- Josh Gitlin Senior Full Stack Developer (415) 690-1610 x155 Stay up to date and join the conversation in Relay . > On Sep 28,

Re: Help with mbuf exhaustion

First of all, 10.3-RELEASE-p2 is very old and has known security vulnerabilities. Have you tried 10.3-RELEASE-p21 or even 10.4-RELEASE ? On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Josh Gitlin wrote: > Hi FreeBSD Gurus! > > We're having an issue with mbuf exhaustion on a FreeBSD server which was > recentl

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:51:11 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ian Smith wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > > > But that is an other issue and it is most likely > > > due to the outdated documentation (that doc still uses port 37 for NTP > > > purposes and referes to the ou

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

Am Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:08:51 +1000 (EST) Ian Smith schrieb: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:47:57 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300 > > Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann > > > wrote: > > > > Hopefully, I'm right on this

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ian Smith wrote: > But that is an other issue and it is most likely > due to the outdated documentation (that doc still uses port 37 for NTP > purposes and referes to the outdated divert mechanism using natd, see the > recent handbook). The internet is also full of ambigous

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:47:57 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300 > Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann > > wrote: > > > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. > > > > > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 1

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:59:15 +0300 Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > > 15.09.2015, 10:48, "O. Hartmann" : > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300 > > Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > >>  On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann > >>   wrote: > >>  > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, pl

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

15.09.2015, 10:48, "O. Hartmann" : > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300 > Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > >>  On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann >>   wrote: >>  > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. >>  > >>  > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300 Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. > > > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16 > > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nm

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:13:33 -0700 Xin Li wrote: > > > On 9/15/15 00:06, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. > > > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16 > > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16 > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets since I had trouble > protecting a server with IPFW

Re: HELP! Mysterious socket 843/tcp listening on CURRENT system

On 9/15/15 00:06, O. Hartmann wrote: > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward. > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16 > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets since I had trouble > protecting a server with IPFW and NAT. > >

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

On 11/1/2014 8:03 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: Thank you for all your help. You have indeed fixed my mistakes. I still have one more mistake, however, which is that my internal network interface isn't getting an IPv6 address, beyond link local. When I added "inet6 accept_rtadv" to the config of re1

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

Thank you for all your help. You have indeed fixed my mistakes. I still have one more mistake, however, which is that my internal network interface isn't getting an IPv6 address, beyond link local. When I added "inet6 accept_rtadv" to the config of re1 in rc.conf, the static "192.168.1.1 netmask

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

> On Nov 1, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Rui Paulo wrote: > >> I find the man pages for dhcp6 pretty awful. The man pages describe the >> options - but not being able to find what /64 is assigned to dhcp6c other >> than running in debug mode seems crazy. > > There's an alternative: dhclient from ports wh

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

On Oct 31, 2014, at 20:23, Chris Inacio wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've tried to find this information in so many ways, but I just can't piece > it together, maybe my Google fu is failing me. > > I have my router/gateway device running FreeBSD 10p11 - so its up to date. > On my internal network

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > >> >> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: >> >> My configs are really basic. dhcp6c.conf: >> >> interface re0 { >> >> send ia-pd 0; >> >> send ia-na 1; >> >> }; >> >> >> id-assoc na 1 { >> >> }; >> >> >>

Re: Help with IPv6 router gateway config, Comcast, DHCP, dnsmasq

> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've tried to find this information in so many ways, but I just can't piece > it together, maybe my Google fu is failing me. > > I have my router/gateway device running FreeBSD 10p11 - so its up to date. > On my internal ne

Re: help porting netmap to new driver

I was able to work this around. The problem was in the driver. Now I start working on customizing the driver to use netmap optimized regards 2014-09-08 9:54 GMT-06:00 David : > Hi > > Sorry for the late response, I'll be using an ARM processor for a 1G link. > > My first issue came when doing w

Re: help porting netmap to new driver

Hi Sorry for the late response, I'll be using an ARM processor for a 1G link. My first issue came when doing what you suggested, and try the "emulated netmap mode". I need to cross compile the code from my x86, which I think I did correctly by setting up my arm toolchain and passing the kernel so

Re: help porting netmap to new driver

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:18 PM, David wrote: > Hi, > > I'm needing to use netmap on a custom driver, I don't understand the > content of the functions I need to implement and that are detailed on > "PORTING" file. > > ​sometimes (often, actually) the hw has bottlenecks that make native netmap mo

Re: Help: Macro limit in file "nd6.h"

At Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:11:54 +, "Varadarajan, Sudharshan" wrote: > When I was going through the file nd6.h, (../sysnetinet6/nd6.h) I find that > macro (prefix list size) "PRLSTSIZ" is defined as 10. Is there any particular > reason for having a lower value like this? I don't remember, but

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

[ .. stuff deleted (WEP-128 problem) ] >one more thing came to my mind: > >you don't need to use wpa_supplicant to get WEP support. AFAIK WEP128 >is different name for 104-bits key and that might be supported without >need of wpa_supplicant. man ifconfig might shed some light. I

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

On 14.02.2012 17:51, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: Hello, could someone provide me wit a hint how to get wpa_supplicant to work in the following environment : - standard : IEEE 802.11 (at least they pretend in the doc) -mode : "infrastructure" (?) -WEP: 128bit - Authent : ope

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

IIRC, a bad WEP key will show up as "associated" but no data will be exchanged. Compile up wlanstats from /usr/src/tools/tools/net80211/wlanstats/ and run it - post the output here. Adrian ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Dnia środa, 15 lutego 2012 16:16:10 Arno J. Klaassen pisze: > Hello, > > Maciej Milewski writes: > >Dnia wtorek, 14 lutego 2012 21:49:01 Adrian Chadd pisze: > >> Wep? With a username/password? I've not seen this. > >> Does anyone have any ideas? > >> Adrian > > > >Probably

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Hello, Maciej Milewski writes: >Dnia wtorek, 14 lutego 2012 21:49:01 Adrian Chadd pisze: > >> Wep? With a username/password? I've not seen this. > >> > >> Does anyone have any ideas? > >> > >> Adrian > >Probably WEP one for all users and username/password as an auth

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:02:22PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > Hello, > > "Paul A. Procacci" writes: > > > Is your DHCP daemon setup to listen on the interface where the AP is > > running? > > Dunno... How could eventually be sure Windows got it's IP-addres by DHCP? > Sorry, you hadn't mad

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Hello, "Paul A. Procacci" writes: > Is your DHCP daemon setup to listen on the interface where the AP is > running? Dunno... How could eventually be sure Windows got it's IP-addres by DHCP? > For username/password prompt upon browser launch, you'll need to configure a > reverse proxy to get

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Dnia wtorek, 14 lutego 2012 21:49:01 Adrian Chadd pisze: > Wep? With a username/password? I've not seen this. > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > Adrian Probably WEP one for all users and username/password as an auth form for captive portal(Network Access Control). I haven't used that so I can't

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Is your DHCP daemon setup to listen on the interface where the AP is running? For username/password prompt upon browser launch, you'll need to configure a reverse proxy to get a cookie upon successful auth to pass through the proxy. ~Paul On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:49:01PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wr

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

Wep? With a username/password? I've not seen this. Does anyone have any ideas? Adrian On 14 February 2012 05:51, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > Hello, > > could someone provide me wit a hint how to get wpa_supplicant > to work in the following environment : > >  - standard  : IEEE 802.11 (at least

Re: [HELP] sendto:No buffer space available

On Friday, May 27, 2011 4:26:35 am linux JHON wrote: > My machine has two net interface cards, fxp0 and acl0, but acl0 is down, > only fxp0 is working. > > When I send raw packets through fxp0, it gives the error: sendto: No buffer > space available. > > I have googled, but I found no answer. The

Re: help tune

> Help me pls, to tune those drops. Clear _ALL_ tuning, use kernel-config-option maxusers 512 NOTE: kern.maxusers in /boot/loader.conf may not been used on some releases, but in newer releases must to be. > I do this tuning: > /etc/sysctl.conf > hw.pci.enable_msix=1 > hw.pci.enable_msi=1 > k

Re: Help! m_copym panic

The best thing to do here is paste a kernel stack trace so people who may know about the 5.0 network stack can try to understand what condition(s) may lead to that situation. Adrian On 26 September 2010 21:04, 罗钰 wrote: > I use a 5.0 freebsd for our company's network device, but one day there

Re: HELP. FreeBSD 8.1 polling issue

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:34:45PM +0800, MAI JIN wrote: > Hi, > > I got a freeBSD 8.1 polling issue on my PC. It is a dual-core Intel > Pentium x86 PC (2.8GHz each core). The Ethernet interface is Broadcom > NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Ethernet interface. > I set the following options (enable polling

RE: HELP. FreeBSD 8.1 polling issue

Hi, I got a freeBSD 8.1 polling issue on my PC. It is a dual-core Intel Pentium x86 PC (2.8GHz each core). The Ethernet interface is Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Ethernet interface. I set the following options (enable polling and zero-buffer copy) and rebuilt the kernel: Code: # To make an SMP

Re: [help]strange problem about gethostbyname/getaddrinfo

Hajimu UMEMOTO 写道: Hi, On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:48:51 +0800 "=?GB2312?B?s8LQocn6?=" said: stutiredboy> hi,all,we have a project which must resolv some domains in the server stutiredboy> process stutiredboy> our system in FreeBSD 6.2 or 6.3, the server process may open 7000+ st

Re: [help]strange problem about gethostbyname/getaddrinfo

Hi, > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:48:51 +0800 > "=?GB2312?B?s8LQocn6?=" said: stutiredboy> hi,all,we have a project which must resolv some domains in the server stutiredboy> process stutiredboy> our system in FreeBSD 6.2 or 6.3, the server process may open 7000+ stutiredboy> sockets,not fork

Re: [help]strange problem about gethostbyname/getaddrinfo

Hi, > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:58:38 -0600 > "David DeSimone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fox> It sounds like the resolver library is running into a 1024-descriptor fox> limit. From select(2): Our resolver doesn't use select(2) but use kqueue(2). So, we don't have this limitation. Sincere

Re: [help]strange problem about gethostbyname/getaddrinfo

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is we found when the server porcess open 1000+ or higher > sockets(but we can query any legal domain in the system normally), the > gethostbyname or getaddrinfo might fetch nothing(sometimes the query > is ok), the gethostbyname's return error is: errno=2

Re: help with code to determine external IP address on FreeBSD gateway machine

Here is the code: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnu/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz You will be interested in route/bsd_show.c and the function in that file named bsd_show. It uses a combination of sysctl and PF_ROUTE to retrieve the information. Please ask if you encounter any problem. :-) Happy hacking,

Re: help with code to determine external IP address on FreeBSD gateway machine

Debarshi, Yes, I would be interested in seeing the code. I would hope that this task isn't too complicated, but I have my suspicions that it will be a fair number of steps. Thanks, Chris On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Debarshi Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I have some PF_ROUTE based code,

Re: Help: FreeBSD 6.3 - em driver & taskqueue & priority

On 8 Jul 2008, at 12:35, Ivan Voras wrote: Joe Kuan wrote: Hi all, I have implemented an network application in kernel space and it is working fine. The application involves 3 network interfaces that FreeBSD 6.3 can forward mbuf between em0 and em1 in a rate 1.3 - 1.4 millions packets pe

Re: Help: FreeBSD 6.3 - em driver & taskqueue & priority

Joe Kuan wrote: > Hi all, > >I have implemented an network application in kernel space and it is > working fine. The application involves 3 network interfaces that FreeBSD > 6.3 can forward mbuf between em0 and em1 in a rate 1.3 - 1.4 millions > packets per second. Em2 is used for controlling

Re: help

David DeSimone wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box in the same subnet. Configure the second with a /32 prefix (netmask 255.255.255.255) instead of the usual netmask. Sure

Re: help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same > >> box in the same subnet. > > > > Configure the second with a /32 prefix (netmask 255.255.255.255) > > instead of the usual netmask. > > Su

Re: help

Bruce M. Simpson wrote: Enovation Technologies wrote: i configure with sysinstall my second nic , but when i restart my box i have this message arp: 10.200.1.1 is on re0 but got reply from 00:50:7f:b0:a0:f8 on re1 my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box in the

Re: help

Enovation Technologies wrote: i configure with sysinstall my second nic , but when i restart my box i have this message arp: 10.200.1.1 is on re0 but got reply from 00:50:7f:b0:a0:f8 on re1 my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box in the same subnet. Config

Re: Help no network with dhcp

--- security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >kev c wrote: > > --- Kip Macy [1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 17, 2007 2:40 PM, kev c > [2]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am trying to install freebsd from an ftp server > > > but > > > the dhcp configuration is not workin

Re: Help no network with dhcp

kev c wrote: --- Kip Macy [1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 17, 2007 2:40 PM, kev c [2]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am trying to install freebsd from an ftp server but the dhcp configuration is not working in sysinstall. It says, no dhcpoffers received.. The computer is wired

Re: Help no network with dhcp

--- Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 2:40 PM, kev c > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am trying to install freebsd from an ftp server > but > > the dhcp configuration is not working in > sysinstall. > > It says, no dhcpoffers received.. > > > > The computer is wired to a dli

Re: Help no network with dhcp

On Nov 17, 2007 2:40 PM, kev c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to install freebsd from an ftp server but > the dhcp configuration is not working in sysinstall. > It says, no dhcpoffers received.. > > The computer is wired to a dlink di624 router acting > as a dhcp server. The server works

Re: Help moving from local lan to internet

On May 25, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: On Thu, 25 May 2006, Ed Pigg wrote: Now when the server starts it hangs for aboutn 5 minutes when the "starting sshd" message is displayed. I can ping the name servers, but nslookup times out when querying well known web sites. I must have

Re: Help moving from local lan to internet

I take it the name servers are not your, right? SSH gets problematic if DNS does not work properly.. Could it be a firewall problem? Do the name-servers know who you are (Is your host in the zone?). You can try dig @name-server some.box.here to query a specific NS, try doing this with your name

Re: Help moving from local lan to internet

On Thu, 25 May 2006, Ed Pigg wrote: > Now when the server starts it hangs for aboutn 5 minutes when the "starting > sshd" message is displayed. I can ping the name servers, but nslookup times > out when querying well known web sites. I must have overlooked something or > left something out? Any he

Re: Help - PPPoE Server

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:19:49 +0530 Murugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > i need a sample(working) configuration files to set up a PPPoE server > in FreeBSD 4.9. http://www.hpi.net/whitepapers/warta/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: Help - PPPoE Server

Murugan wrote: Hi i need a sample(working) configuration files to set up a PPPoE server in FreeBSD 4.9. www.google.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Help with CARP implementation

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:35:49PM -0200, Tiago Cruz wrote: T> > There are examples in 'man 4 carp'. T> T> Yes, I've read all the FAQ from OpenBSD from CARP, man pages of carp and T> pfsync. But the better article about this I found here: T> T> http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9658/sam0505e/ T>

Re: Help with CARP implementation

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 18:45 +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > There are examples in 'man 4 carp'. Yes, I've read all the FAQ from OpenBSD from CARP, man pages of carp and pfsync. But the better article about this I found here: http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9658/sam0505e/ Following this I can do

Re: Help with CARP implementation

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:16:25PM -0200, Tiago Cruz wrote: T> I'm novice in redundancy world, but I've read all documentation that I T> can, like manpages, FAQ from OpenBSD.org and anothers but I still T> without make my router redundancy works :( T> T> My interfaces are this: T> T> Master: T> x

Re: Help reqd: Configuring sppp

Hi, freebsduser (sent by Nabble.com): Hello List, I am facing problem in using sppp. Both local system amd remote systems are using the sppp. My questions are 1.Can we use sppp as PPP server? 2.If answer to first question is yes ,how can I do that? I tried out the following commands. $ifc

Re: Help ! Proxy arp at PPTP (FIXED)

I already fix it... I was using the wrong interface at pptp server side. Elton Machado wrote: Hi! How can i have proxyarp in my tun interface created by the pptpd ? I want to connect from my pptp client to the others clients connected to the pptpd server. I have this at my config file: /etc/ppp/o

Re: help needed with dummynet

Hi , checkout the 'netnice' tool , here is the link : http://www.netnice.org/ you can use 'netnice' just like the well know 'nice' except the fact that the ressource managed by 'nice' is the cpu , while 'netnice' manages the network interface access. Enjoy , -- Saber On Tue, September 7,

Re: help:: configuring two network interfaces--message->>ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists

В вт, 07/09/2004 в 10:38 +0300, Dmitriy V. Andrushko пишет: > > ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > You can't have two network interfaces on the same subnet. You can > configure your net next way: > ifconfig_rl1

Re: help:: configuring two network interfaces--message->>ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists

> ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" You can't have two network interfaces on the same subnet. You can configure your net next way: ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.2

Re: help:: configuring two network interfaces--message->>ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists

Hello kamal, I am not sure but this may be the result of the attempt to assign inet address from the subnet that is already used on the rl0 iface. If you are sure that that you need this behaviour, use netmask of -1 on the rl1 iface. Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 11:10:30 AM, kamal kc wrote: kk>

Re: help needed with dummynet

Alex Povolotsky wrote: I want to make ssh traffic 'top priority', giving it all bandwidth it wants, without explicitly limiting other kinds of traffic. OK. Consider something like the following: ipfw pipe 1 config ipfw queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 100 ipfw queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 1 ipfw add q

Re: Thoughts on IPv6, was: Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:25:42PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 03:43 PM, Barney Wolff wrote: > >My expectation is the same as yours, but I strongly believe that > >anyone doing a new design that deliberately ignores IPv6 is being very > >shortsighted. "Quite so

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:39, Charles Swiger wrote: > > Also, Barney's comments here: > ...make sense to me as well, for whatever that may be worth :-) Worth a lot, actually. If we can get 4 people looking at the problem from such diverse viewpoints and come to a point where we all agr

Thoughts on IPv6, was: Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 03:43 PM, Barney Wolff wrote: My expectation is the same as yours, but I strongly believe that anyone doing a new design that deliberately ignores IPv6 is being very shortsighted. "Quite some time" is now only years, not decades. It might be useful to consider ano

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 03:43 PM, Barney Wolff wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:23:57PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote: What are you going to do when IPv6 comes into more general use, since it has no broadcast address? Are you asking what a IPv4-to-IPv6 translator (like gif?) should do, o

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:23:57PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote: > >What are you going to do when IPv6 comes into more general use, since > >it has no broadcast address? > > Are you asking what a IPv4-to-IPv6 translator (like gif?) should do, or > are you worried about the case of a machine config

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 02:45 PM, Wes Peters wrote: The all-ones broadcast is supposed to go to all physically connected network segments, regardless of whether a particular interface is ifconfig'ured with an IP that is part of a particular layer-3 subnet. You should be able to send the b

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:23 am, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Barney Wolff wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > What are you going to do when IPv6 comes into more general use, since > > it has no broadca

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:52 am, Barney Wolff wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > To me it's not a matter of "boot code" vs. general usefulness so much > > as it's just obviously the right way to do it. We use all-ones > > packets well after boot to have o

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Barney Wolff wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: [ ... ] What are you going to do when IPv6 comes into more general use, since it has no broadcast address? Are you asking what a IPv4-to-IPv6 translator (like gif?) should do,

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:55:55AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > To me it's not a matter of "boot code" vs. general usefulness so much as > it's just obviously the right way to do it. We use all-ones packets well > after boot to have our appliances identify each other on the network and > share

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Tuesday 21 October 2003 03:23 pm, Barney Wolff wrote: > Bruce M Simpson wrote pointing > out AODV (RFC 3561) as an example of a routing protocol needing to > send to 255.255.255.255 on multiple interfaces at once. I withdraw > my scorn of kernel mods to facilitate this. To me it's not a matter

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

Bruce M Simpson wrote pointing out AODV (RFC 3561) as an example of a routing protocol needing to send to 255.255.255.255 on multiple interfaces at once. I withdraw my scorn of kernel mods to facilitate this. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract o

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:42:50PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: > And of course any application that actually needs to send such a packet > on every interface can loop through the interfaces, using the technique > on each one, getting the reply, removing the 255.0.0.0/8 alias, and > moving on to the

Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > But does it send the packet to all attached interfaces on a multi-homed > host? This is the type of bug that has typically bitten such hackish > solutions in the past. One real solution is worth much more than the > sum of the so

  1   2   >