On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > But does it send the packet to all attached interfaces on a multi-homed > host? This is the type of bug that has typically bitten such hackish > solutions in the past. One real solution is worth much more than the > sum of the sort-of but not really working hacks we have flying about > now.
Bughood is in the eye of the beholder. RFC1122 has this to say, in section 3.3.6: (255.255.255.255 is the "Limited Broadcast" address) There has been discussion on whether a datagram addressed to the Limited Broadcast address ought to be sent from all the interfaces of a multihomed host. This specification takes no stand on the issue. And of course any application that actually needs to send such a packet on every interface can loop through the interfaces, using the technique on each one, getting the reply, removing the 255.0.0.0/8 alias, and moving on to the next interface. If it were up to me (as of course it is not) I'd leave it at that and not clutter up the kernel. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"