Re: AX88179 USB-to-Ethernet is slow and silently corrupts data

2018-05-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:11:24PM -0700, Dieter BSD wrote: > > 10.3-RELEASE [...] > pyunyh> Which phy driver is used for axge(4)? > pyunyh> You can see the phy driver name below axge(4) attachment in dmesg > pyunyh> output. > > axge0: on usbus2 > axge1: on usbus0 > miibus4: > on axge0 >

Re: AX88179 USB-to-Ethernet is slow and silently corrupts data

2018-04-23 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:54:58PM -0700, Dieter BSD wrote: > 10.3-RELEASE > amd64 with ECC memory > VIA VL805 USB 3.0 controller > ue0 is Siig USB-to-Ethernet Chipset: AX88179 > > ugen0.7: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST >spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=ON (124mA) > > ue0: flags=8c43 metric 0 > mtu

Re: mbuf_jumbo_9k & iSCSI failing

2017-06-26 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 03:44:58PM +0200, Julien Cigar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:13:33PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > On 25.06.2017 18:32, Ryan Stone wrote: > > > Having looking at the original email more closely, I see that you showed > > > an > > > mlxen interface with a 9020 MT

Re: Vlan offloaded checksums

2016-09-12 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:09:02PM +0200, Emeric POUPON wrote: > Hello, > > I have a network driver that supports hardware checksums. > Thanks to offset parameters, it also supports VLAN checksums. > However, it does not handle hardware tagging (not sure the underlying network > adapter can actua

Re: Marvell Yukon (msk) network card causes the "sticky mouse" problem: mouse stops for extended periods of time

2016-05-15 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:17:09AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 05/11/2016 22:58, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >hw.msk.msi_disable is a loader tunable so you can't check it with > >sysctl(8). Add the tunable to boot/loader.conf to take it effect. > >See loader.conf(5) for more i

Re: Marvell Yukon (msk) network card causes the "sticky mouse" problem: mouse stops for extended periods of time

2016-05-11 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:46:01PM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 05/08/2016 02:33, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >msk(4) will try to use MSI unless not configured to do so the IRQ > >wouldn't be shared with other devices. If msk(4) is using MSI you > >should see a high irq number gr

Re: Marvell Yukon (msk) network card causes the "sticky mouse" problem: mouse stops for extended periods of time

2016-05-08 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:33:39AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 05/07/2016 08:34, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > >Verify if your mouse (USB one?) is using IRQ 18 too. > >"vmstat -ai" command would be helpful. > Yes, I have a USB mouse, and my USB uses IRQ 18: > > irq18: ehci0 uhci5503154

Re: Support for Killer E2400 Ethernet

2016-02-21 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:23:28PM +0100, Tino Engel wrote: > Thanks very much for the quick reply. > > So let me shed some words on your input: > > First: Limiting the memory size did not help at all, nothing changed. > Unfortunetly I cannot post the whole results of the sysctl, since I cannot

Re: Support for Killer E2400 Ethernet

2016-02-18 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:17:30PM +0100, Tino Engel wrote: > > > > Hello all, > I am trying to establish support for the Killer E2400 ethernet adapter. > I am following the approach that works for the linux driver, which is > basically:- Add the E2400 device ID- Copy all device related stuff f

Re: Hi, can u help me with Atheros card?

2015-09-21 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:26:58AM +, wrote: > Hi. How can i activate network card Atheros AR8151 ? > > > [root@ASTERSUSHI /usr/home/nord]# uname -a > FreeBSD ASTERSUSHI 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Aug 17 > 02:11:08 MSK 2015 root@ASTERSUSHI:/usr/obj/

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-19 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:13:59AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:51:44AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > On 08/19/15 09:42, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > >On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Hans Petter S

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-19 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:35AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 08/19/15 09:42, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > >> On 08/18/15 23:54, Rick Macklem wrote: > &g

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-19 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:51:44AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 08/19/15 09:42, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >>On 08/18/15 23:54, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>>Ouch! Yes, I now see that the code

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-19 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 08/18/15 23:54, Rick Macklem wrote: > >Ouch! Yes, I now see that the code that counts the # of mbufs is before the > >code that adds the tcp/ip header mbuf. > > > >In my opinion, this should be fixed by setting if_hw_tsomaxse

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-19 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:04:25PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 08/18/15 14:53, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > If this is just a test machine, maybe you could test with these lines (at > > > about #880) > > > in sys/netinet/tcp_output.c commented out? (It looks to me li

Re: RE not working on 10.2-RELEASE #0 r286731M

2015-08-16 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:29:08PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote: [...] > > On 08/14/15 13:34, Kim Culhan wrote: > >> RE on 10.2-RELEASE #0 r286731M appears to pass only arp traffic. > >> > >> Replaced if_re.c with version from 273757, appears to work > >> normally. > >> > >> The diff: > >> > >> 34c34

Re: cpsw/atphy network drivers

2015-03-12 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:17:12PM +, Matt Dooner wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your reply. Confirming the link configuration was a good > exercise, but I think I've been able to rule it out as the issue. > 100baseTX appears to be the configuration request by the > switch the board was pl

Re: cpsw/atphy network drivers

2015-03-08 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:45:22PM +, Matt Dooner wrote: > Hello, > > I am having some trouble configurating the network driver on a TI > T335x-based CoM system > (http://www.compulab.co.il/products/computer-on-modules/cm-t335/). It > uses the "the AM335x integrated Ethernet MAC coupled with t

Re: Very bad Realtek problems

2014-10-29 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:01:26PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:46:30AM +0900, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > Given that you can reliably reproduce the issue, let's check simple ones > > first. > > Just as a quick update, I couldn'

Re: Very bad Realtek problems

2014-10-28 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:44:45PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50:20AM +0900, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > Currently re(4) heavily relies on power on default settings since no > > detailed register configuration is not available. Some register

Re: Very bad Realtek problems

2014-10-27 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:51:24PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > Hi, all. > > I've been having sporadic and serious problems with the Realtek gigabit > interface built into my motherboard. Periodically, it just freezes up. I've > tried several things to no avail: turning on DEVICE_POLLING, fr

Re: [CFT] alc(4) QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controller support

2014-10-01 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:14:59AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote: > Hi, > > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > Default interrupt moderation policy is targeted to reduce latency > > so it will generate up to 10k interrupts/sec under high network > > load. If you want to reduce num

Re: [CFT] alc(4) QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controller support

2014-09-30 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote: > Hi, > > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> Then I've connected a network cable and rebooted. I've got a link and > >> performed an "iperf" test. The results are really good: around 930 Mbit/s

Re: [CFT] alc(4) QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controller support

2014-09-30 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:20:31AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote: > Hi Yonghyeon, > > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > I've added support for QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controllers. It > > passed my limited testing and I need more testers. You can find > > patches from the f

Re: Success with Qualcomm Atheros QCA8171

2014-09-29 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:44:24AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote: > Hi Gulyaev, > > Gulyaev Ghosh wrote: > > Since I ask on the FreeBSD forums, there is a proposition to check > > alx-freebsd and have initialized interface. > > > > So if someone have similar hardware, you can got your experience with >

Re: Success with Qualcomm Atheros QCA8171

2014-09-26 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:17:57AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:44:24AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote: > > > > Hi Gulyaev, > > > > Gulyaev Ghosh wrote: > > > Since I ask on the FreeBSD forums, there is a proposition to check > > > alx-freebsd and have initialized interface. > > >

Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down....

2014-09-16 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:59:18PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > > > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > >> > >>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and >

Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down....

2014-09-16 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: > > >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > > > >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and > >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs >

Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down....

2014-09-16 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to > >know exact chip revision? > > Here you are. > > jme0: port > 0xec80-0x

Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down....

2014-09-14 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:13:44PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > Everyone: > > I just installed FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE on an Asus EeeBox B202 (which > comes with Linux). This particular version of the product comes > with a JMicron gigabit Ethernet adapter that uses the jme(4) > driver. Because it

Re: NFS client READ performance on -current

2014-07-15 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 05:14:00PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yonghyeon Pyun wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:54:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:31:43 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > &g

Re: NFS client READ performance on -current

2014-07-11 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:54:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:31:43 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 03, 2014 8:51:01 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 07/02/14 19:09, Rick

Re: [RFC] Allow m_dup() to use JUMBO clusters

2014-07-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:12:07AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that > existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background > for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag long mbuf chains that > doesn't

Re: TX Checksum offloading issue with re interfaces

2014-05-12 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:09:18PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On 12 May 2014, at 06:38, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:33:24PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> On 09 May 2014, at 03:47, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: RX checksum offloading problem

2014-05-12 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:22:03PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On 12 May 2014, at 03:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:46:48PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> On 09 May 2014, at 03:35, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> [...] > > Oo

Re: TX Checksum offloading issue with re interfaces

2014-05-08 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > Dear all, > > while testing checksum offloading of UDP packets over IP with IP options, I > figured > out that my card > > dev.re.1.%desc: RealTek 8168/8111 B/C/CP/D/DP/E/F/G PCIe Gigabit Ethernet > dev.re.1.%driver: re > dev.re.1

Re: RX checksum offloading problem

2014-05-08 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On 07 May 2014, at 10:37, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> On 07 May 2014, at 09:56, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: RX checksum offloading problem

2014-05-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On 07 May 2014, at 09:56, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> On 02 May 2014, at 16:02, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: RX checksum offloading problem

2014-05-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On 02 May 2014, at 16:02, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > > On 02 May 2014, at 10:22 , Michael Tuexen > > wrote: > > > >> Dear all, > >> > >> during testing I found that FreeBSD head (on a raspberry pi) accepts SCTP > >> packet

Re: re(4) causes memory corruption?

2014-04-08 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:21:12AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I have this network card (it's actually integrated into a motherboard): > > re0: port > 0xde00-0xdeff mem 0xfdaff000-0xfdaf,0xfdae-0xfdae irq 18 at device > 0.0 on pci2 > re0: Using 1 MSI-X message > re0: Chip rev. 0x3

Re: re0: watchdog timeout

2014-04-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:45:00PM +0200, Frank Volf wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN schreef op 7-4-2014 10:32: > >It would be even better to know your network configuration. I'm not > >sure why you have to disable VLAN hardware tagging. But given that > >you've disabled i

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0

Re: re0: watchdog timeout

2014-04-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:09:04AM +0200, Frank Volf wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN schreef op 7-4-2014 3:22: > >On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>Frank Volf wrote: > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>I'm experiencing watch

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-06 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> >> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Ch

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-06 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> >> [...] > >> >> >> miibus0: on nfe0 > >> >> >>

Re: re0: watchdog timeout

2014-04-06 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Frank Volf wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm experiencing watchdog timeouts with my Realtek interface card. > > > > I'm using a fairly new system (Shuttle DS47), running FreeBSD > > 10-STABLE. > > For this shuttle a patch has been r

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-01 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> >> [...] > >> >> miibus0: on nfe0 > >> >> rlphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > >> >> rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX,

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-01 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:19 -0700, Chris H wrote: > >> [...] > >> miibus0: on nfe0 > >> rlphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > >> rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow > >> rlphy1: PHY 1 on miibus0 > > [...]---bi

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-04-01 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:57:28AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:12:20PM -0700, chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> I'm not sure whether this best belonged on net@, or stable@ > >> so I'm using both. :) > >> I'm testing both releng_9, and MB, and I encountered

Re: miibus0: mii_mediachg: can't handle non-zero PHY instance 31

2014-03-30 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:12:20PM -0700, chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote: > Greetings, > I'm not sure whether this best belonged on net@, or stable@ > so I'm using both. :) > I'm testing both releng_9, and MB, and I encountered a new > message I don't usually see using the nfe(4) driver: > > miibus

Re: RFC: How to fix the NFS/iSCSI vs TSO problem

2014-03-30 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:27:48PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > pyu...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this, > > > but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networki

Re: RFC: How to fix the NFS/iSCSI vs TSO problem

2014-03-25 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this, > but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networking > types say it. > If you look in this mailing list thread: > > http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?185

Re: Problem with Lenovo SL500

2013-10-07 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:14:58PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > > This machine has for its wired port a RealTek unit: > > re0: port > 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfcfff000-0xfcff,0xfcfe-0xfcfe irq 19 > at device 0.0 on pci12 > re0: Using 1 MSI-X message > re0: ASPM disabled > re0: Chip re

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

2013-09-10 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:31:49AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/10/13 04:15, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:42:56PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>On 09/06/13 08:15, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:47:01PM +0200, Guido

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

2013-09-09 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:42:56PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/06/13 08:15, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:47:01PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >>>On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +020

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

2013-09-05 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:47:01PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies >

Re: bce(4) panics, 9.2rc1 [redux]

2013-07-31 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:54:06PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > [Added yougari@ and davidch@ to the To:/Cc: list] > > I confirmed that my issue reported on -current@ is due to the bxe(4) > driver (BCM57711). If it is disabled, shutdown works fine without > NMI. > > Also, I received several re

Re: kern/180382: [ae] kernel: ae0: watchdog timeout - resetting.

2013-07-16 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
x27;ll request re approval after settlement. > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM, claudiu vasadi > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Quick update: works now. > > > > Will let you know if it continues like this or if we hit another problem. > > > > Huge t

Re: sis(4) flow control

2013-07-14 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:52:38PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > >> Maybe there is a bug in vr(4) that generates the hang, but why is > > > > Probably yes and I shall have to narrow down the issue. > > One more hint: No hang - but

Re: kern/180382: [ae] kernel: ae0: watchdog timeout - resetting.

2013-07-14 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:20:30PM +0200, claudiu vasadi wrote: > Hi, > > The patch applied without any problems and the "Size mismatch" messages > are gone now. However, we cannot get an IP via "dhclient" and we also > don't have any network connectivity if we set a manual IP. The only > messages

Re: sis(4) flow control

2013-07-14 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > >>> Try attached patch and let me know how it works. > >> Thanks for your patch. I will test it on next update of my soekris boxes > >> with sis interfaces. Because th

Re: sis(4) flow control

2013-07-10 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:18:19AM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > Hmm, does the change really make flow-control work? > > I believe flow-control should be negotiated with remote link > > partner so you have to announce flow-control capability

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

2013-07-10 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies > it like this: > > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11c01734 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x07 > hdr=0x00 > > I'm running FreeBSD current r252261. > > As

Re: sis(4) flow control

2013-07-09 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:52:25PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Some of my soekris boxes run with sis interfaces. Because I need > ethernet flow control on these boxes I use the following patch (against > 8-Stable) for some years: > > --- if_sis.c.orig 2013-05-15 20:01:16.0 +0200

Re: misc/179033: [dc] dc ethernet driver seems to have issues with some multiport card and mother board combinations

2013-06-10 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote: > Is there any down side to using that dc fix in pfsense for now? If dc(4) works as expected there is no reason not to use memory BARs. Generally using memory BARs is more efficient. Many old PCI controllers used to have bugs with memory BA

Re: misc/179033: [dc] dc ethernet driver seems to have issues with some multiport card and mother board combinations

2013-06-10 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
dwin wrote: > >On Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:12:14 am YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >>On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:58:10PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote: > >>>Sorry for the confusion Pyun, > >>> > >>>I started looking at it in the context of pfsense, but they rejecte

Re: misc/179033: [dc] dc ethernet driver seems to have issues with some multiport card and mother board combinations

2013-05-29 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:58:10PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote: > Sorry for the confusion Pyun, > > I started looking at it in the context of pfsense, but they rejected my > bug report which was understandable because it's an upstream issue. They > suggested I resubmit it to you guys if I could reprod

Re: bge(4) sysctl tuneables -- a blast from the past.

2013-04-16 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:14:54PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:35:56PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> > >>>FreeBSD has too many knobs, but it would be nice if the bge defaults > >

Re: bge(4) sysctl tuneables -- a blast from the past.

2013-04-15 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:35:56PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > FreeBSD has too many knobs, but it would be nice if the bge defaults weren't > > so broken, so that they don't need overriding. > > > > Bruce > > > So many knobs ... well here's more. :-) > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/b

Re: enable tcpdump GUESS_TSO flag?

2013-04-07 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:24:18AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder whether it'd be a good idea to enable tcpdump's GUESS_TSO flag by > default? It enables a heuristic that lets tcpdump understand pcaps that > include segments generated by TCP TSO (which otherwise show up as "IP bad

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-18 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:45:24AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 14.03.2013 13:29, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > >I thought you were using stable/8 but it seems you have slightly > >older stable/8. The bge(4) code difference between CURRENT and > >stable

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-14 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:44:33PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 13.03.2013 07:57, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > > If your controller supports ASF/IPMI access please apply r248226 > > to stable/8 and let me know whether that makes any difference. >

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-12 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 05:15:48PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:14:03PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On 07.03.2013 12:23, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:08:50AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-12 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:37:03PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > [...] > > >>I can provide you full access to this machine (if you want) or let me > >>know

Re: Limits on jumbo mbuf cluster allocation

2013-03-08 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 12:27:37AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:10:41AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > I have a machine (actually six of them) with an Intel dual-10G NIC on > >

Re: Limits on jumbo mbuf cluster allocation

2013-03-07 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:10:41AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I have a machine (actually six of them) with an Intel dual-10G NIC on > the motherboard. Two of them (so far) are connected to a network > using jumbo frames, with an MTU a little under 9k, so the ixgbe driver > allocates 32,000 9k

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-07 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:14:03PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 07.03.2013 12:23, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:08:50AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > >> It was definitely older than "months". It was running someth

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:22:51AM +0300, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > Hi, > > here is my situation, much like the issue > No, your issue is completely different one. > On 06.03.2013 12:26, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > If you were using latest stable/8, the result would be same o

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:08:50AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 07.03.2013 8:24, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >What was previous SVN revision number on that machine? > >The support for 5718/5719/5720 was merged to stable/8 about 3 > >months ago. > &g

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:00:34PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > Hi. > > On 06.03.2013 12:26, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > If you were using latest stable/8, the result would be same on > > CURRENT. > > How frequently do you see the watchdog timeouts? Is

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-03-05 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:48:13AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 28.02.2013 11:35, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > The reporter said the machine was Sun Fire X2200 M2 so I guess you > > may see the same issue on both stable/9 and stable/8. Ideally the > > load

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-02-27 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:05:47AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > [...] > > >bge(4)'s IPMI support for old controllers had many issues and > >didn't work we

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-02-26 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:05:47AM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 25.02.2013 14:20, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote: > >>Dnia sobota, 23 lutego 2013 o 04:54:07 Marc Fournier napisał(a): > >&

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-02-25 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia sobota, 23 lutego 2013 o 04:54:07 Marc Fournier napisał(a): > > We just picked up 5 new HP DL 360p Gen8 E5-2630 2P servers … just installed > > 9.1-RELEASE, and it looks like all of the hardware is detected properly, > > a

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout

2013-02-25 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:54:07PM -0800, Marc Fournier wrote: > > > > We just picked up 5 new HP DL 360p Gen8 E5-2630 2P servers … just installed > 9.1-RELEASE, and it looks like all of the hardware is detected properly, and > being configured … > > After reboot, I start getting the 'watchd

Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory

2013-01-27 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > On Friday 25 January 2013 05:50:48 YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:30:43PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:21:50PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > >

Re: [SOLVED] if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX [working with patched if_rl]

2013-01-15 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:04:49PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:51: > > > >Hmm, I don't get it. > >Diff inlined again. > > > >Index: sys/pci/if_rlreg.h > >=

Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX

2013-01-14 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:47:38AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:40: > >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44: > >>>On Mon, Jan 14, 20

Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX

2013-01-14 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44: > >On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15: > >>>On Sat, Jan 12, 20

Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX

2013-01-14 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15: > >On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an > >

Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX

2013-01-13 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an > patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got this: > > kernel: vr0: port 0xd100-0xd1ff > mem 0xf7c11000-0xf7c110ff irq 19 at de

Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe driver

2013-01-01 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:04:47PM -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > > --- On Mon, 12/31/12, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > From: Adrian Chadd > > Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in > > bxe driver > > To: "Garrett Cooper" > > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "David Chri

Re: svn commit: r242739 - stable/9/sys/dev/ti

2012-11-07 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:15:30PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > So I am curious - did this give a real benefit? In 3.x/4.x days it surely have had helped a lot, I guess mainly because the CPU was not fast enough to saturate the link with software checksum(i.e. NFS over UDP). Generally I prefer cor

Re: bxe + if_lagg

2012-10-31 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:05:37PM -0400, Tom Judge wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/31/12 3:47 AM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:23:37AM -0400, Tom Judge wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> I am try

Re: bxe + if_lagg

2012-10-31 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:23:37AM -0400, Tom Judge wrote: [...] > I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between > the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state > is not being propagated up to the lagg device. > > Any hints/ideas? > > > > dmes

Re: kern/171520: [alc] alc network driver + tso + vlan does not work.

2012-10-21 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:15:28AM +0600, Nikolay Nevzorov wrote: > 2012/10/22 Eugene Grosbein > > > 22.10.2012 10:55, Nikolay Nevzorov пишет: > > > I can make clean test. > > > > > > What do you mean by clean: > > > reboot with disable mpd (and so will be not enabled kernel NAT in > > system) or

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE Realtek 8168/81111 Driver

2012-09-26 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:12:19PM +0300, Vladimir Vladimir wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got an issue with new mother board ASUS P8Z77-M PRO. > > My FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE can't set up Network interface for integrated NIC > Realtek 8168/8. > > I have tried FreeBSD-8.2, and FreeBSD-9.0 > I' down

Re: kern/167325: [netinet] [patch] sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC

2012-09-13 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:44:48PM -0400, Jeremiah Lott wrote: > On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:07 AM, lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > > > Old Synopsis: sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC > > New Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and > > VLAN on 82

Re: Dell PowerEdge R820 Broadcom BCM57800 support

2012-09-09 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:45:59PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:56 -0700, John wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > >I have an R820 I'm testing. The system seems to boot up fine, but > > no network adapters show up. From pciconf -l : > > > > none4@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 support

2012-09-05 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:21:05PM -0700, Jason Wolfe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > > > On 13.07.2012 04:39, Jason Wolfe wrote: > >> > >> bge0: mem > >> 0xf6bf-0xf6bf,0xf6be-0xf6be,0xf6bd-0xf6bd irq > >> 32 at devic

  1   2   3   >