Thanks for your help on this!
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:09 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 14.03.2018 1:28, Rob Hutton wrote:
>
> > Trying to get to a LACP Trunk config working on FreeNAS, but I'm not sure
> > if this is an upstream issue. First step is just LACP bundle
Trying to get to a LACP Trunk config working on FreeNAS, but I'm not sure
if this is an upstream issue. First step is just LACP bundle in edge mode
(no vlans) and bundle will not form. The FreeNAS side shows it as being
active. The switch is reporting that LACP is not enabled on the individual
p
I have a VPS server running FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 and nginx. It contains
three very low volume web sites that have been up for about three years. I
was tinkering with TLS and SSL ciphers by eliminating TLSv1 and TLSv1.1
with different ciphers when I noticed my daily "Network interface status"
rep
Hi,
I have been playing with vnet jails, and have a configuration working that
I thought would not be (based on the docs out there), but it is. I have a
box with 3 NICS - hme0, em0 and em1. Basically, with the assumption that
the internet facing gateway is potentially a weak point, I set out to
Hi,
I previously had a freebsd 7.0 box set up as an IPv6 router for my
home network, behind a sixxs tunnel. It was running rtadvd to hand out
IPv6 addresses from my sixxs block to the network.
However, after migrating this configuration over to a newly installed
FreeBSD 7.2 box it appears that th
tephan Uphoff.
>
> I tested it today.
>
> Best,
> George
>
>
--
Rob Watt
Hudson River Trading
212.479.3954
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
acc in ?? ()
Thanks
--
Rob Watt
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
was
the same exact behavior that we saw with the earlier version of the em
driver I figured it was the same bug resurfacing again.
-
Rob Watt
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Rob Watt wrote:
Hi,
In 6.1-RELEASE there were a number of em driver stability and performance
issues. We would regularly see
LEASE SMP kernel.
-
Rob Watt
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 9/1/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was my earlier point Rob, that delta of the driver WILL NOT
build against 6.1 RELEASE, it has taskqueue changes in it that
are not in the release, as well as a few other small gotchas.
To get that f
on been tested? Will that version play nicely with 6.1?
Thanks!
-
Rob Watt
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
g in the past on these machines
with tons of network/disk/cpu/memory activity all happening at the same
time, and we've never encountered this bug. The fact that it is not easily
repeatable makes it hard to test for. Any testing suggestions would also
be appreciated.
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
>> Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
>> > software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
>> > This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
>> > user of
an would know :-) The other end is a RH box, I'm not sure of
the specifics right now. But it's up and running and I can access the
network.
Thank you everyone for all of your help.
Rob
> Rob Zietlow wrote:
> >On Monday 23 May 2005 08:18 am, Tim Pushor wrote:
> >
to give us time for the ppp
# connection to come up
timeout=5
# This is the command to start pppd
CMD="/usr/sbin/pppd file /usr/home/rob/vpn/options.vpn"
# A place for control files
svcdir="$HOME/.pppssh"
# A place for pids to keep track of processes
rundir="$svcdir/run
.
testee# bash bin/vpn.init start
Waiting for connection...
Using interface ppp0
/usr/sbin/pppd: In file /usr/home/rob/vpn/options.vpn: unrecognized option
'pty'
Connection Failed
This appears to be the last piece of the puzzle for me in order to get this to
work. So it leaves me to ask I
Hi. Sorry if this has been covered before. I purchased a D-Link DWL-650,
and it turned out to be the newer RevP model. I built the NDIS wrapper
around drivers from the windows CD, but it doesn't seem to pick up the
card. I tried using that both as a module, and built into my kernel. My
laptop
Thanks for the response Mike, but pppoe still seems to be broken.
Disableing vjcomp didn't seem to work for me. I tried it with
enable vjcomp
disable vjcomp
in my ppp.conf file. Didn't seem to help. I did get Brian Somer's fix
to /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.c This didn't seem to help eit
alid argument
I also attempted 'pppstats tun0'
PITA# pppstats tun0
pppstats: invalid interface 'tun0' specified
pppstats: couldn't get PPP statistics: Invalid argument
PITA# pppstats -h
pppstats: illegal option -- h
Usage: pppstats [-a|-d] [-v|-r|-z] [-c count] [-w wait] [
On Thursday 20 June 2002 03:22 pm, Brian Somers wrote:
> I get this here:
>
> Jun 12 22:31:38 gw ppp[93193]: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_ACNAME (hook
> "hak") Jun 12 22:31:39 gw ppp[93193]: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_SESSIONID
> (hook "*") Jun 12 22:31:40 gw ppp[93193]: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_SUCC
* Naga Narayanaswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020523 19:21]:
> When you say src address is set to host group, what application generates
> them? What is the src and dest address ? I quickly checked Rich Stevens vol
> II.
> Looks like the code has been like this since old days.
> Is the application se
* Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020522 20:30]:
> I was just wondering why the src address is set to the host group in
> outgoing multicast packets on RELENG_4? As far as I can tell, rfc1054
> says that the src address should be set to that of the host, not the
> host group (6.2). The beh
I was just wondering why the src address is set to the host group in
outgoing multicast packets on RELENG_4? As far as I can tell, rfc1054
says that the src address should be set to that of the host, not the
host group (6.2). The behavior exists in 4.5-release also.
I noticed this because linux
eBSD man page
does not require the sa_len field to be initialized prior to calling
getnameinfo(). Since it's not required, it should not be relied upon.
Rob
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
still ensure that enough memory is
available to proceed, but it also allows more memory than
is needed.
Rob
diff -u -d -b -w -u -d -r1.7 getnameinfo.c
--- getnameinfo.c 2001/02/15 10:35:54 1.7
+++ getnameinfo.c 2002/02/27 20:48:14
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
if (sa ==
> ---SNIP---
>
>>gateway_enable="YES"
>
> good
>
>>hostname="PITA.the-rob.com"
>>network_interfaces="xl0 dc0 lo0"
>>ifconfig_dc0="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>>ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1"
>>ifconfig_xl0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>
> still looking good
>
>>ipfilter_enable
advanced. Please CC: me as I am no longer on this list until
I start my new job later this week.
Rob
UNAME -A:
FreeBSD PITA.the-rob.com 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #2 Sat Jan 19 13:35:26 GMT
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/FIREWALL i386
RC.CONF:
# -- sysinstall generated deltas -- #
This message was posted Feb of '99.
I was wondering if anyone has made an efforts towards this yet.
(i.e. Wanna make sure I don't make a hack that's already made.)
Thanks.
--Rob
> the bridges above will be not be doing any IP routing, just forwarding
> IP packets based o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> Let me put it another way: I think this sort of thing is an excellent
> example of introducing unnecessary kernel bloat into the system. Who
> gives a fart whether someone can port scan you
29 matches
Mail list logo
