-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> Let me put it another way: I think this sort of thing is an excellent
> example of introducing unnecessary kernel bloat into the system. Who
> gives a fart whether someone can port scan you efficiently or
> anonymously or not? I get port scanned every day. Most hackers don't
> even bother with portscans, they just try the exploit on the target
> machines directly.
You could add a kernel config variable in case someone wants a less
bloated kernel.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE63LNpv8Bofna59hYRA/5RAKCIRJTLpcf8kZ7q86QeLrfUzWBM9gCgqhuO
GTxP1jwxVOgpsCpfGjx10js=
=Y/2k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
