On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > &
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Just for info I
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just for info I ran a test using TREX (https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/)
> Where I just sent traffic in one direction through the box running FreeBSD
> with VPP using the netmap interfaces.
> These were the results we found befor
[repost since it appears to be blocked]
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:42 PM Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden :
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> > started with the porting of VPP (https
any case.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
-+
ave to disable checksum offloading on vtnet1.
Cheers
Luigi
It is a bug?
> Thanks to all!
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freeb
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:18 AM Özkan KIRIK wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it is possible to update dummynet code multi-threading capable
> practically?
> My idea is below:
> - A new sysctl tunable will be defined as
> "net.inet.ip.dummynet.thread_count" (default 1)
> - To distribute tasks along
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:18 AM Özkan KIRIK wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it is possible to update dummynet code multi-threading capable
> practically?
> My idea is below:
> - A new sysctl tunable will be defined as
> "net.inet.ip.dummynet.thread_count" (default 1)
> - To distribute tasks along
--------+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-2217533
map.
>
> Thank you so much for your precious time.
>
> " Man needs his difficulties because they are necessary to enjoy success."
>
> Kind Regards
> Suneet Kumar Singh
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suneet_Singh7
--
-+---
cket in the slot is sent to the network/NIC
>>> physical
>>> queue?
>>>
>>> I am using Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Xiaoye
>>> ___
>>> freebsd-net@freeb
sible to
> justify. So I think asking vendors to support a FreeBSD ethtool-ish
> interface for this is asking a lot.
>
> Drew
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>>>>>>> Why is IFNET_WLOCK needed here? It seems like a regression to
>>>>>>>>> disallow
>>>>>>>>> sleep on the control path.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>&
locked @
>>>>>> /root/ws/head/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_freebsd.c:95
>>>>>> stack backtrace:
>>>>>> #0 0x810837a5 at witness_debugger+0xe5
>>>>>> #1 0x81084d88 at witness_warn+0x3b8
>>>>>> #2 0x83ef2bcc at begin_synchronized_op+0x6c
>>>>>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:05:33PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>> Please have a look at the source code if you can find where
>> you are hitting the limit, and which parameters are involved.
>> In case you
-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-----+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-221753
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 07.06.16 15:22, Andrew Vylegzhanin wrote:
> > Just for support Luigi assumption.
> >
> > I've tested on 11.0-ALPHA1 (r301204).
> > Same situation with frame size 5166 and works _well_ with frame size
> 4032.
>
> This was changed in
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
-+---
Prof. Luig
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:53:25PM -0700, bazzoola wrote:
> Thanks Adrian, and thanks Luigi for the explanation:
>
> On 04/28/2016 01:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > please re-read the relevant part of the manual page:
> >
> >RECEIVE RINGS
> >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 9:15 PM, bazzoola wrote:
>
>
> On 04/28/2016 12:06 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2016, bazzoola > <mailto:bazzo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/28/2016 11:35 AM
ts own
> rings. Is there a way to know if netmap's rx ring overrun?
Overruns by definition can only be counted by the NIC
Cheers
Luigi
>
> Thanks for your input.
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
eason that my test machine is panicing.
> I might give 10.3 a go instead of head and see how I get on with that.
>
> Matt
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>
Gbit/s per direction.
For the time being you can find it on github
https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap/tree/master/apps/nmreplay
(the source code is actually a single file).
Enjoy
Luigi
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2
Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (
freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http
ARP request message to get the mac address of
>>>>>> machine3.
>>>>>> machine3 gets that ARP request, and send the reply back (I use tcpdump
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> verify that machine3 gets the ARP request and send out the ARP re
on the list, anything else in netmap mode?
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> Make sure you disable TSO on the interface used in netmap
>> mode, and then check that you use an MTU of 1500 on that
>> interface.
>> You should not receive f
man/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Xiaoye Sun wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Xiaoye Sun wrote:
>> > Hi Luigi,
>> >
>> > I have to clarify about the *jumping issue* about the
is really one NIC ring and one HOST ring.
>
> Is there another way to verify the number of ring that netmap has?
>
> Thanks!
> Xiaoye
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> there must be some wrong with your setting because
>&
===
> As we can see, from the event ordering see by the bridge.c, all the packets
> are receiver in order, which means the the reorder happens when the bridge
> code swap the buf_idx between the nic ring(slot) and the host ring(slot).
> The reordered seq usually right before or afte
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Xiaoye Sun wrote:
> Hi Luigi,
>
> Thanks for your advice.
> I forgot to mention that I use the command "ethtool -L eth1 combined 1" to
> set the number of rings of the nic to 1. The host also only has one ring.
> I understand the situation where the first tx ring
> > patch?
>> > What is the recommended solution for this problem?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Xiaoye
>> > ___
>> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>> > ht
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:46:52 -0500 (EST)
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:06:39 -0800
>> > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> >
&
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:06:39 -0800
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:22:13AM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote:
>&g
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:22:13AM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote:
>> +ssize_t
>> +recvmmsg(int s, struct mmsghdr *__restrict msgvec, size_t vlen, int flags,
>> +const struct timespec *__restrict timeout)
>> +{
>> + size_t i, rc
gt; ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 09:33:32PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/24/2016 at 1:10 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" wrote:
...
&g
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>
>
> On 1/24/2016 at 3:33 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" wrote:
...
> ok here it is
>
> this lowered pps rate to 9.4Mpps on chelsio (we had 11Mpps with defaul len)
> and lowered rates to 14Mpps on sender (we had 1
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>
>
> On 1/24/2016 at 1:10 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" wrote:
>>
>>Thanks for re-running the experiments.
>>
>>I am changing the subject so that in the archives it is clear
>>that the chelsio car
dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_ppp1: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_ppp0: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_pause: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_frames_1519_max: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_frames_1024_1518: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_frames_512_1023: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_frames_256_511: 0
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:12:28AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:48:39PM -0200, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>> > ...
>> >
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:48:39PM -0200, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
> ...
>>
>> woops, my bad, yes probably we had some drop, with -S and -D now I get
>> 1.2Mpps.
>
> Run "netstat -hdw1 -i cxl" on the receiver during your test.
Navdeep, does
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>>> woops, my bad, yes probably we had some drop, with -S and -D now
>>I get 1.2Mpps.
>>>
>>> curiously, I have always used -s/-d with IP addresses on ix-ix
>>testing this is why I never noticed the case, since ix always
>>received 14Mpps,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>
>
> On 1/23/2016 at 3:35 PM, "Luigi Rizzo" wrote:
>>
>>On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Marcus Cenzatti
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/23/2016 at 1:40 PM, "Navdeep Parhar
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>
>
> On 1/23/2016 at 1:40 PM, "Navdeep Parhar" wrote:
>>
>>On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:34:27AM -0200, Marcus Cenzatti wrote:
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> I am testing a chelsio t520-so-cr connected to a Intel card with
>>ix(4)
>>> driver, I can get th
cr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TE
nd any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-----+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Pavel Odintsov
wrote:
> Hello, Dear Community!
>
> I'm working with netmap and my application uses netmap for traffic
> capture. It's works really well.
>
> But I need some way to feed same data from physical interface to two
> or more applications.
>
> I have foun
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
> On 07Jan16, Luigi Rizzo allegedly wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Konstantin Belousov
>> So (and using *mmsg() vs *msg() is about performance) I think that
>> until we have an underlying performant implem
nt performance improvements,
especially on the send side -- e.g. some argument to tell the syscall
"there are more packets coming down so please hold on a bit".
For receive, there is probably very little room for enhancements,
the best we can do is grab everything from the socket.
che
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>>> NetBSD 7.0 has just introduced these two syscalls. And Linux also has
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Does FreeBSD have them? Or plan to support them in the future?
>>
>>
>> FreeBSD does not have them. It doesn't
, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-----+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Di
4.8 and the same set of hardware setup, except
>> for a different transceiver, I can get 36Gbps/24Mpps with no further
>> tweaks, so if you can replace your transceiver, shall be a different test
>> as a starting point.
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.fre
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 11/06/15 09:50, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hans Petter Selasky
>> wrote:
...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The C_DIRECT_EXEC flag reduces task switching overhead, t
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 11/06/15 01:08, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 5 November 2015 8:53 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/05/15 00:44, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
...
>> Removing C_HARDCLOCK reduces the problem but doesn't solve
gt; 3.5 gbit is what I used to see on the ixgbe with tso disabled, probably
>> hitting a CPU bound.
>
> Will try.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lars
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'
On Monday, October 19, 2015, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-10-19, at 16:20, Luigi Rizzo >
> wrote:
> >
> > i would look at the following:
> > - c states and clock speed - make sure you never go below C1,
> > and fix the clock speed to max.
> &g
U #13 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #24 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #6 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #27 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #8 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #29 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #11 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #20 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #15 Launched!
> SMP: AP CPU #26 Launched!
>
ndent mechanism to configure traffic steering.
We really need to address the latter.
cheers
luigi
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/.
repo (which i wrote a few years ago).
Again we may work on that around the end of the year.
cheers
luigi
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/
I would like people's suggestions on the following
topic.
Right now, on enteringng netmap mode on a NIC we do an ifconfig
down, flush the tx and rx queues, and replace the rx buffers with
the netmap ones. Similarly, on exit, we down the interface, flush
queues and restore the mbufs/skbufs. Th
_
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> "
>
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it .
able TSO and LRO too.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Olivier
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> http://bsdrp.net/documentation/examples/forwarding_performance_lab_of_an_ibm_system_x3550_m3_with_10-gigabit_intel_x540-at2#gra
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <
>>
o/freebsd-net
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ===
> Eduardo Meyer
> pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com
&
__
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:05:41PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov
> wrote:
> >
> > > Working with netmap and modern hardware I am lacking some featu
tp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
-----+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Infor
t; ConnectX-4 Lx EN provides an unmatched combination of 10, 25, 40, and
> 50GbE bandwidth, sub microsecond latency and a 75 million packets per
> second message rate.
>
> Do you have experience with this cards
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Luigi Rizzo > wrote:
> &
t; To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> "
>
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-2217533
in pedantic mode the compiler complains about
an enum value out of range (in sys/netinet/ip_var.h)
Would people object to the following change ?
It seems to be used internally only in a handful of places
+
/* ISO C restricts enumerator values to range of 'int'
+
* so we need
IPFW_INFO_
IN
Hi,
some time next week we will push to head (and hopefully, to stable/10
before the code slush) an update to the netmap code. There will
be no API changes, and the changes are mostly internal restructuring
of the netmap kernel code and simplification of device drivers (we
will ll handle most of t
_
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
-+---
/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To uns
sts.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Univ
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:53:34PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> L> Then if you do sys/net/altq/ do you also plan to split the current
> L> content of sys/net/ into separate subdirectories ?
> L>
> L> We currentl
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 09:38:23AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> L> > With the new ifnet KPI, that is now being developed in projects/ifnet,
> L> > the ALTQ will need some tweaking. It is discontinued by initial autho
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:53:46PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi!
>
> With the new ifnet KPI, that is now being developed in projects/ifnet,
> the ALTQ will need some tweaking. It is discontinued by initial author
> for a decade now, and it has already experienced direct commits in
> our tr
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:14 PM, C.L. Martinez wrote:
> On 03/25/2015 02:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> perhaps it is easier to tell if you explain what those pf_ring options do.
>> i am puzzled by the question on disabling tx, because if you do not
>> want to
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM, C.L. Martinez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to configure some values in netmap under a FreeBSD 10.1 host
> like it can be done with pf_ring in linux.
>
> According to netmap(4) manual page exists some options using sysctl. But I
> am searching about these opti
org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Wei Hu wrote:
> Many thanks, Luigi! We are measuring the network performance in VM(Hyper-V),
> using netvsc virtual NIC device and its own driver. The Linux VM also uses
> the similar virtual device. The driver on both Linux and FreeBSD have TSO/LRO
> support. Wi
reebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
-----+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/. Un
e seen 32 Mpps on tx, 24 Mpps on rx
with two ports on the same card connected to each other.
This is our second 40G device for which we have native
netmap support, which makes FreeBSD quite unique.
cheers
luigi
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:20:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Luigi Rizzo
Subject: svn commit: r
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Luke McHale wrote:
> Hello Dr. Luigi Rizzo and netmap contributors,
>
> I am looking to integrate netmap capabilities into linux’s veth (Virtual
> Ethernet device) for netmap support within linux containers. Does a patch
> currently exist? If n
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:02:46PM -0500, Antoine Beaupr? wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 17:39:17, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:08:27PM -0500, Antoine Beaupr? wrote:
> >> On 2015-01-27 13:57:20, wishmaster wrote:
> >> > Have you consider to use netmap
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:08:27PM -0500, Antoine Beaupr? wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 13:57:20, wishmaster wrote:
> > Have you consider to use netmap-based ipfw instead pf in DDoS mitigation? I
> > think you should. And without any network ''haks'' like polling.
>
> My understanding of netmap was that
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Ciprian Barbu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some questions related to OpenDataPlane. I have implemented the
> I/O access using netmap for ODP but currently it's suffering from low
> performance due to packets being copied between the netmap slots and
> ODP buffers.
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 07:37:03PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using netmap on Ubuntu 14.04 (3.13.0-44 kernel, ixgbe 3.15.1-k), and
> I can't max out a 10G link with pktgen :
>
> Sent 1068122462 packets, 64 bytes each, in 84.29 seconds.
> Speed: 12.67 Mpps Bandwidth: 6.49 Gbps (raw 8
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:15:02AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
...
> This won't be the first time that there'll be useful data at the front
> end of an RX mbuf that isn't related to the mbuf payload.
>
> It'd be nice if there were something in each rx ring slot saying how
> far to skip into the buf
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... surely virtio should be skipping over those bytes in the netmap rx
> side before handing them up?
>
> (It won't be the only hardware that puts the RX descriptor status in
> the RX frame itself..)
it is not the rx descriptor, thos
e packet interpretation.
>
>
> So is this is an artifact of the virtio-net driver or has something
> changed in the netmap device driver?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Avinash
>
--
-+---
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell&
[I realize this is code from 15 years ago so i am not sure if anyone
still knows or remembers the answer]
sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c is used to request via bootp or dhcp an address
and a boot path. The negotiation is done in a loop, and apparently
when replies are received on _all_ interfaces, the code
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 09:57:21PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 06:42:07PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 09:32:55PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 09:32:55PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 08:40:35PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > Can anybody explain netmap pipes (more then netmap(4))?
> >
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 08:40:35PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> Can anybody explain netmap pipes (more then netmap(4))?
> How use it?
> How it works?
> pipes works over existing network adapter in netmap mode?
> Or indepened (can I create netmap pipe named 'some_strange_name')?
> What purpose
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 06:57:50PM +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> FreeBSD has netmap support for chelsio T5 cards, which is amazing.
> The great thing about implementation is that you can play with
> traffic-generating applications without affecting "main" OS interface,
> w
1 - 100 of 933 matches
Mail list logo
