On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov < >>> pavel.odint...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello! >>> > >>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance >>> of >>> > kipfw on each pair: >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 >>> > >>> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux >>> > netmap). >>> > >>> >>> Wow cool hint and cool numbers. >>> >>> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? >>> >>> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like >>> >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 >>> >>> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on >>> both ix1 and ix2. >>> >> >> it won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, >> that's a different logic. >> >> cheers >> luigi >> > > yeah it's what I thought, > different queues, different packets > > what about the first approach? should I expect issues? > > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1 > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2 > it won't do what anything sensible: processes will compete for packets randomly passing them to one or the other port. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
